Skip to main content

Empirical Analysis of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Cyberbullying Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 56))

Abstract

Cyberbullying is utilization of digital technology for targeting a person or a group in order to bully them socially and psychologically. Real-time social media platforms such as Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube have a large viewership, which serves as a fertile medium for such bullying activities. Instances of such harassment or intimidation are maximally found in the comments of a dynamic and an expressive medium like YouTube. This necessitates an adequate requisite to take relevant steps to find solutions for the detection and prevention of cyberbullying. The work presented in this paper focuses on the implementation of four supervised machine learning methodologies, namely Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, Sequential Machine Optimization, and Naive Bayes in order to identify and detect the presence or absence of cyberbullying in YouTube video comments. The experimentation was carried out expending the Weka toolkit and utilizing the data gathered from comments obtained from YouTube videos involving core sensitive topics like race, culture, gender, sexuality, and physical attributes. The results are analyzed based on the measures like precision, accuracy, recall, and F-score and amongst the four techniques implemented, k-Nearest Neighbor is able to recognize the true positives with highest accuracy of around 83%. We also discuss various future research prospects for detection of cyberbullying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kumar A, Sebastian TM (2012) Sentiment analysis: a perspective on its past, present and future. IJISA 4:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agatston P-W, Kowalski R, Limber S (2007) Student perspective of cyberbullying. J Adolesc Health. Official publication of the Soc Adolesc Med 41:59–S60

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colette L (2013) Cyberbullying, associated harm and the criminal law. PhD Thesis, University of South Australia, pp 1–352

    Google Scholar 

  4. Suler J (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology Behav 7:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Foody M, Samara M, Carlbring P (2015) A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy. Internet Inventions Elsevier 2:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Robers S, Kemp J, Truman J, Synder T-D (2013) Indicators of school crime and safety: 2012. Bur Justice Stat 1–211

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatia MPS, Khalid AK (2008) Information retrieval and machine learning: supporting technologies for web mining research and practice. Webology 5

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhatia MPS, Kumar A (2008) A primer on the web information retrieval paradigm. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 4(7):657–662

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang Q, Singh V-K, Atrey PK (2014) Cyberbullying detection using probabilistic socio-textual information fusion. In: ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pp 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang X, Tong J, Vishwamitra N, Whittaker E, Mazer J-P, Kowalski R, Hu H, Luo F, Macbeth J, Dillon E (2016) Cyberbullying detection with a pronunciation based convolutional neural network. In: 15th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA), pp 740–745

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Q, Singh V-K, Atrey P-K (2014) Cyber bullying detection using social and textual analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on socially-aware multimedia ACM

    Google Scholar 

  12. Santos I, Miñambres-Marcos I, Laorden C, Galán-García P, Santamaría-Ibirika A, Bringas PG (2013) Twitter content-based spam filtering. In: Herrero Á et al (eds) International joint conference SOCO’13-CISIS’13-ICEUTE’13. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 239, pp 449–458. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mangaonkar A, Hayrapetian A, Raje R (2015) Collaborative detection of cyberbullying behavior in Twitter. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on electro/information technology (EIT), pp 611–616

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dadvar M, Jong F (2012) Cyberbullying detection: a step toward a safer internet yard. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web ACM, pp 121–126

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dinakar K, Jones B, Havasi C, Lieberman H, Picard R (2012) Common sense reasoning for detection, prevention, and mitigation of cyberbullying. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst 2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karthik D, Roi R, Henry L (2011) Modeling the detection of textual cyber bullying. In: Cyberbullying social mobile web workshop at 5th international AAAI conference on weblog and social media, pp 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dadvar M, Trieschnigg D, de Jong F (2014) Experts and machines against bullies: a hybrid approach to detect cyberbullies. In: Canadian conference on artificial intelligence. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dadvar M, de Jong F, Trieschnigg D (2014) Expert knowledge for automatic detection of bullies in social networks. In: Canadian conference on artificial intelligence, pp 275–281

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhong H, Li H, Squicciarini A-C, Rajtmajer S-M, Griffin C, Miller D-J, Caragea C (2016) Content-driven detection of cyberbullying on the instagram social network. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-16), pp 3952–3958

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hosseinmardi H, Mattson S-A, Rafiq R-I, Han R, Lv Q, Mishra S (2015) Detection of cyberbullying incidents on the instagram social network. Technical report by Association for the advancement of artificial intelligence, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ortony A, Clore GL, Foss MA (1987) The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cogn Sci 11:341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akshi Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, A., Nayak, S., Chandra, N. (2019). Empirical Analysis of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Cyberbullying Detection. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Hassanien, A., Gupta, D., Khanna, A., Pan, I. (eds) International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 56. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2354-6_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics