Abstract
Cyberbullying is utilization of digital technology for targeting a person or a group in order to bully them socially and psychologically. Real-time social media platforms such as Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube have a large viewership, which serves as a fertile medium for such bullying activities. Instances of such harassment or intimidation are maximally found in the comments of a dynamic and an expressive medium like YouTube. This necessitates an adequate requisite to take relevant steps to find solutions for the detection and prevention of cyberbullying. The work presented in this paper focuses on the implementation of four supervised machine learning methodologies, namely Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, Sequential Machine Optimization, and Naive Bayes in order to identify and detect the presence or absence of cyberbullying in YouTube video comments. The experimentation was carried out expending the Weka toolkit and utilizing the data gathered from comments obtained from YouTube videos involving core sensitive topics like race, culture, gender, sexuality, and physical attributes. The results are analyzed based on the measures like precision, accuracy, recall, and F-score and amongst the four techniques implemented, k-Nearest Neighbor is able to recognize the true positives with highest accuracy of around 83%. We also discuss various future research prospects for detection of cyberbullying.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kumar A, Sebastian TM (2012) Sentiment analysis: a perspective on its past, present and future. IJISA 4:1–14
Agatston P-W, Kowalski R, Limber S (2007) Student perspective of cyberbullying. J Adolesc Health. Official publication of the Soc Adolesc Med 41:59–S60
Colette L (2013) Cyberbullying, associated harm and the criminal law. PhD Thesis, University of South Australia, pp 1–352
Suler J (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology Behav 7:321–326
Foody M, Samara M, Carlbring P (2015) A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy. Internet Inventions Elsevier 2:235–242
Robers S, Kemp J, Truman J, Synder T-D (2013) Indicators of school crime and safety: 2012. Bur Justice Stat 1–211
Bhatia MPS, Khalid AK (2008) Information retrieval and machine learning: supporting technologies for web mining research and practice. Webology 5
Bhatia MPS, Kumar A (2008) A primer on the web information retrieval paradigm. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 4(7):657–662
Huang Q, Singh V-K, Atrey PK (2014) Cyberbullying detection using probabilistic socio-textual information fusion. In: ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pp 3–6
Zhang X, Tong J, Vishwamitra N, Whittaker E, Mazer J-P, Kowalski R, Hu H, Luo F, Macbeth J, Dillon E (2016) Cyberbullying detection with a pronunciation based convolutional neural network. In: 15th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA), pp 740–745
Huang Q, Singh V-K, Atrey P-K (2014) Cyber bullying detection using social and textual analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on socially-aware multimedia ACM
Santos I, Miñambres-Marcos I, Laorden C, Galán-García P, Santamaría-Ibirika A, Bringas PG (2013) Twitter content-based spam filtering. In: Herrero Á et al (eds) International joint conference SOCO’13-CISIS’13-ICEUTE’13. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 239, pp 449–458. Springer
Mangaonkar A, Hayrapetian A, Raje R (2015) Collaborative detection of cyberbullying behavior in Twitter. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on electro/information technology (EIT), pp 611–616
Dadvar M, Jong F (2012) Cyberbullying detection: a step toward a safer internet yard. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web ACM, pp 121–126
Dinakar K, Jones B, Havasi C, Lieberman H, Picard R (2012) Common sense reasoning for detection, prevention, and mitigation of cyberbullying. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst 2
Karthik D, Roi R, Henry L (2011) Modeling the detection of textual cyber bullying. In: Cyberbullying social mobile web workshop at 5th international AAAI conference on weblog and social media, pp 11–17
Dadvar M, Trieschnigg D, de Jong F (2014) Experts and machines against bullies: a hybrid approach to detect cyberbullies. In: Canadian conference on artificial intelligence. Springer
Dadvar M, de Jong F, Trieschnigg D (2014) Expert knowledge for automatic detection of bullies in social networks. In: Canadian conference on artificial intelligence, pp 275–281
Zhong H, Li H, Squicciarini A-C, Rajtmajer S-M, Griffin C, Miller D-J, Caragea C (2016) Content-driven detection of cyberbullying on the instagram social network. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-16), pp 3952–3958
Hosseinmardi H, Mattson S-A, Rafiq R-I, Han R, Lv Q, Mishra S (2015) Detection of cyberbullying incidents on the instagram social network. Technical report by Association for the advancement of artificial intelligence, pp 1–9
Ortony A, Clore GL, Foss MA (1987) The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cogn Sci 11:341–364
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kumar, A., Nayak, S., Chandra, N. (2019). Empirical Analysis of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Cyberbullying Detection. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Hassanien, A., Gupta, D., Khanna, A., Pan, I. (eds) International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 56. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2354-6_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2354-6_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2353-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2354-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)