Accelerated Carbonation Technology of Reactive MgO-Stabilized Soil for Possible CO2 Sequestration

  • Guanghua CaiEmail author
  • Songyu Liu
  • Guanghui Shao
  • Guangyin Du
  • Liang Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


Nowadays, the cement industry is under pressure to reduce the carbon footprint and energy demands of cement-based construction materials. Carbonation technology is a process that the Ca-/Mg- alkaline materials can react with CO2 to form stable carbonates, thus it is regarded as a potentially attractive technology of CO2 sequestration, including mineral carbonation, cement/concrete carbonation, and carbonation of reactive MgO-stabilized material. This paper investigates the CO2 uptake of reactive MgO-stabilized soils after accelerated carbonation under the high CO2 concentration (99.9%). The CO2 uptake is examined through the HNO3 acidification test and thermal analysis technology. Key results revealed that the carbonation of reactive MgO-stabilized soils could consume large amounts of water and CO2 to produce expansive carbonation products. The CO2 uptake is observably affected by several factors such as MgO content, water content, carbonation time and CO2 pressure. After the several hour’s carbonation (about 3–6 h), the CO2 uptake can basically achieves about 0.8–1.0 times matter quantity of reactive MgO.


Accelerated carbonation Reactive MgO Greenhouse gas Sequestration CO2 uptake 



This work was financially supported by the High-level Talent Research Fund of Nanjing Forestry University (GXL2018028), the Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Traffic Engineering Construction Bureau (2018T01), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41330641, 51279032) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0800201).


  1. Haselbach L, Thomas A (2014) Carbon sequestration in concrete sidewalk samples. Constr Build Mater 54:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Li L, Zhao N, Wei W, Sun Y (2013) A review of research progress on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fuel 108:112–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Olajire AA (2013) A review of mineral carbonation technology in sequestration of CO2. J Petrol Sci Eng 109:364–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hashim H, Douglas P, Elkamel A, Croiset E (2005) Optimization model for energy planning with CO2 emission considerations. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(4):879–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feely RA, Sabine CL, Lee K et al (2004) Impact of anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 system in the oceans. Science 05:362–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keeling CD, Whorf TP, Wahlen M et al (1995) Inter-annual extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide since 1980. Nature 75:666–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Olajire AA (2010) CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications—a review. Energy 35:2610–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sabine CL, Feely RA, Gruber N et al (2004) The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science 305:367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrzej C, Karin HC (2013) Effects of reactive magnesia on microstructure and frost durability of portland cement-based binders. J Mater Civ Eng 25:1941–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Horpibulsuk S, Phetchuay C, Chinkulkijniwat A (2012) Soil stabilization by calcium carbide residue and fly ash. J Mater Civ Eng 24(2):184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jin F, Gu K, Al-Tabbaa A (2014) Strength and drying shrinkage of reactive MgO modified alkali-activated slag paste. Constr Build Mater 51(1):395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sukmak P, Silva DP, Horpibulsuk S et al (2014) Sulfate resistance of clay-portland cement and clay high-calcium fly ash geopolymer. J Mater Civ Eng 04014158:1–11Google Scholar
  13. Yi Y, Liska M, Unluer C, Al-Tabbaa A (2013) Carbonating magnesia for soil stabilization. Can Geotech J 50(8):899–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yi Y, Lu KW, Liu SY et al (2016) Property changes of reactive magnesia-stabilized soil subjected to forced carbonation. Can Geotech J 53(2):314–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cai GH, Liu SY, Du YJ et al (2015a) Strength and deformation characteristics of carbonated reactive magnesia treated silt soil. J Central South Univ 22(5):1859–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cai GH, Du YJ, Liu SY, Singh DN (2015b) Physical properties, electrical resistivity and strength characteristics of carbonated silty soil admixed with reactive magnesia. Can Geotech J 52(11):1699–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liska M, Vandeperre LJ, Al-Tabbaa A (2008) Influence of carbonation on the properties of reactive magnesia cement-based pressed masonry units. Adv Cem Res 20(2):53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vandeperre LJ, Al-Tabbaa A (2007) Accelerated carbonation of reactive MgO cements. Adv Cem Res 19(2):67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Unluer C, Al-Tabbaa A (2014) Enhancing the carbonation of MgO cement porous blocks through improved curing conditions. Cem Concr Res 59(5):55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guanghua Cai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Songyu Liu
    • 2
  • Guanghui Shao
    • 1
  • Guangyin Du
    • 2
  • Liang Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations