Skip to main content

Response Differentiation of Rock Characteristics Under Impact Loading

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics Volume 3 (ICEG 2018)

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVENG))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1976 Accesses

Abstract

An innovative dynamic test simulation system was used for impact drilling, a series of experiments were carried out on intact sandstone, limestone, gabbro and marble rocks. The reflected stress wave in the experimental bar was measured and the corresponding strain energy was calculated. The results have shown that the response degree of reflected stress wave depends on impact energy and lower threshold value of response. It is hard to detect under current technical conditions if the impact energy is below the threshold value. The peak reflected stress wave and the specific strain energy relate to rock type, strength and wave impedance. For the same type of rock, it grows with increasing impact energy, the ratio is related to the wave impedance instead of impact energy when it is over or equal to the threshold value. It shows significant differences in experimented rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ugur I, Demirdag S, Yavuz H (2010) Effect of rock properties on the Los Angeles abrasion and impact test characteristics of the aggregates. Mater Charact 61(1):90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(7):981–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Harthi AA (2001) A field index to determine the strength characteristics of crushed aggregate. Bull Eng Geol Env 60(3):193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fener M, Kahraman S, Bilgil A, Gunaydin O (2005) A comparative evaluation of indirect methods to estimate the compressive strength of rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(4):329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong FQ, Li XB, Dong LJ (2011) Experimental determination of dynamic tensile strength of sandstone at different loading rate. In: Rock mechanics: achievements and ambitions-proceedings, 2nd ISRM international young scholars’ symposium on rock mechanics. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 789–792

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ge T, Wang MY (2007) Characters near strong impact loading zone in hard rock. Explosion Shock Waves 27(4):306–311

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kahraman S, Bilgin N, Feridunoglu C (2003) Dominant rock properties affecting the penetration rate of percussive drills. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(5):711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gong FQ, Li XB, Liu XL et al (2010) Experimental study of dynamic characteristics of sandstone under one-dimensional coupled static and dynamic loads. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(10):2076–2085

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yan DM, Liu KH, Li HD, Xu SL (2015) A study on the dynamic compressive behavior of pre-damaged concrete. J Hydraul Eng 46(9):1110–1118

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ai HA, Ahrens TJ (2006) Simulation of dynamic response of granite: a numerical approach of shock-induced damage beneath impact craters. Int J Impact Eng 33(1–12):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong ZF, Yin S, Wang HW, et al (2010) The dynamic characteristics analysis of moon soil drilling device. In: 61st international astronautical congress 2010. International Astronautical Federation, IAF, Paris, pp 8239–8246

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maca P, Konvalinka P, Curbach M (2014) Behavior of different types of concrete under impact and quasi-static loading. Appl Mech Mater 486:295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xia K, Yao W (2015) Dynamic rock tests using split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar system. a review. J. Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7(1):27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Song B, Chen W (2004) Loading and unloading split Hopkinson pressure bar pulse-shaping techniques for dynamic hysteretic loops. Exp Mech 44:622–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xia K, Nasseri MHB, Mohantya F et al (2008) Effects of microstructures on dynamic compression of Barre granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dai F, Xia K (2010) Loading rate dependence of tensile strength anisotropy of barre granite. Pure appl Geophys 167:1419–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naigen Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tan, N. (2019). Response Differentiation of Rock Characteristics Under Impact Loading. In: Zhan, L., Chen, Y., Bouazza, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics Volume 3. ICEG 2018. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2227-3_58

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics