Influence of Physical and Biochemical Composition of Three Cellulose Fibers on Cracking of Soil

  • Rishita Boddu
  • Min Hong
  • Yongkang Deng
  • Fengjiao Chen
  • Ankit Garg
  • Sanandam Bordoloi
  • Viroon KamchoomEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


Different soil improvement techniques have been used to intensify the engineering properties of soil. Three different lignocellulose fiber-reinforced (jute, coir and water hyacinth (WH)) have been explored on the desiccation potential of compacted clayey silt coil. The experimental methodology involved the mixing of fibers with soil at requisite amount and subjecting them to natural environment with controlled irrigating. The controlled irrigation comprised of 15 wetting/drying cycles for 105 days. Parameters like matric suction and water content were focused upon and recorded along with the surface crack formation. The data obtained from the field experiments were analyzed using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach, which is developed in house using C++ language. From the analysis, it can be comprehended that coir is more effective as a reinforcement due to its multifilament nature and higher lignin content which is suitable in resisting crack formation. Further, optimization analysis and sensitivity analysis suggested mechanism of cracking for each fiber.


Desiccation cracks Lignocellulose fibers Crack intensity factor Soil water retention ANN 


  1. 1.
    Anggraini V, Asadi A, Huat BB, Nahazanan H (2015) Effects of coir fibers on tensile and compressive strength of lime treated soft soil. Measurement 59:372–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pourakbar S, Asadi A, Huat BB, Fasihnikoutalab MH (2015) Stabilization of clayey soil using ultrafine palm oil fuel ash (POFA) and cement. Transp Geotech 3:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blasón S, Correia JAFDO, Apetre N, Arcari A, De Jesus AMP, Moreira PMGP, Fernández-Canteli A (2016) Proposal of a fatigue crack propagation model taking into account crack closure effects using a modified CCS crack growth model. Procedia Struct Integrity 1:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waldron LJ (1977) The shear resistance of root-permeated homogeneous and stratified soil 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41(5):843–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li X, Zhou W, Liu F, Zhu GZ, Shamsuzzoha M, Celler K, Shao YT (2017) About materials science. J Mater Res 32(12/28)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bordoloi S, Garg A, Sreedeep S, Lin P, Mei G (2018) Investigation of cracking and water availability of soil-biochar composite synthesized from invasive weed water hyacinth. Bioresour TechnolGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell CA, Biederbeck VO, Zentner RP, Lafond GP (1991) Effect of crop rotations and cultural practices on soil organic matter, microbial biomass and respiration in a thin Black Chernozem. Can J Soil Sci 71(3):363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lee SE, Al-Wabel MI, Tsang DC, Ok YS (2017) Biochar-induced changes in soil properties affected immobilization/mobilization of metals/metalloids in contaminated soils. J Soils Sediments 17(3):717–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krisnanto S, Rahardjo H, Fredlund DG, Leong EC (2014) Mapping of cracked soils and lateral water flow characteristics through a network of cracks. Eng Geol 172:12–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yesiller N, Miller CJ, Inci G, Yaldo K (2000) Desiccation and cracking behavior of three compacted landfill liner soils. Eng Geol 57(1–2):105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costa S, Kodikara J, Shannon B (2013) Salient factors controlling desiccation cracking of clay in laboratory experiments. Géotechnique 63(1):18. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cui YJ, Tang CS, Tang AM, Ta AN (2014) Investigation of soil desiccation cracking using an environmental chamber. Italian Geotechnical Journal. 1:9–20Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costa S, Kodikara J, Barbour SL, Fredlund DG (2017) Theoretical analysis of desiccation crack spacing of a thin, long soil layer. Acta Geotechnica 1–11. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hearle JW, Morton WE (2008) Physical properties of textile fibers. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (1993) The static compaction of soils. Geotechnique 43(2)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pejic BM, Kostic MM, Skundric PD, Praskalo JZ (2008) The effects of hemicelluloses and lignin removal on water uptake behavior of hemp fibers. Bioresour Technol 99(15):7152–7159. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rishita Boddu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Min Hong
    • 1
  • Yongkang Deng
    • 1
  • Fengjiao Chen
    • 1
  • Ankit Garg
    • 1
  • Sanandam Bordoloi
    • 1
  • Viroon Kamchoom
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Shantou UniversityGuangdongChina
  2. 2.Mahindra École CentraleHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.Faculty of EngineeringKing Mongkut’s Institute of Technology LadkrabangBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations