Non-isothermal Gas Flow During Carbon Sequestration in Coalbeds

  • Min ChenEmail author
  • Lee J. Hosking
  • Hywel R. Thomas
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


This paper presents a numerical investigation of non-isothermal effects during high pressure carbon dioxide injection in deep coalbeds. Whilst coalbeds provide storage security owing to the large carbon dioxide adsorption capacity of coal, high pressure gas injection may disturb the temperature of the coalbed and influence flow behaviour. A numerical model of coupled heat transfer and gas flow incorporating the Joule-Thomson cooling effect is presented in this paper to study the temperature change induced by carbon dioxide injection. The numerical model is firstly compared with existing results in the literature for verification, and then applied to simulate changes in temperature and pressure of a coalbed during gas flow. Results of predicted temperature and pressure under different injection temperatures show that a zone of cooling occurs when gas injection under the same and low temperature than that of coalbeds, leading to a further drop of pressure in this zone. Although injection under higher temperature can suppress cooling effect, the time for pressure to reach steady state increases.


Temperature change Deep coalbeds High pressure gas Joule-Thomson cooling Heat transfer 


  1. Busch A et al (2004) Methane and carbon dioxide adsorption-diffusion experiments on coal: upscaling and modeling. Int J Coal Geol 60(2):151–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duru OO, Horne RN (2010) Modeling reservoir temperature transients and reservoir-parameter estimation constrained to the model. SPE Reservoir Eval Eng 13(06):873–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fathi E, Akkutlu IY (2014) Multi-component gas transport and adsorption effects during CO2 injection and enhanced shale gas recovery. Int J Coal Geol 123:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Han WS et al (2010) Evaluation of potential nonisothermal processes and heat transport during CO2 sequestration. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 115(B7)Google Scholar
  5. Krooss BV et al (2002) High-pressure methane and carbon dioxide adsorption on dry and moisture-equilibrated Pennsylvanian coals. Int J Coal Geol 51(2):6992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu Q et al (2015) A mathematical model of coupled gas flow and coal deformation with gas diffusion and klinkenberg effects. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(3):1163–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mathias SA et al (2010) Analytical solution for Joule-Thomson cooling during CO2 geosequestration in depleted oil and gas reservoirs. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4(5):6–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Oldenburg CM (2007) Joule-Thomson cooling due to CO2 injection into natural gas reservoirs. Energy Convers Manag 48(6):1808–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Palmer I, Mansoori J (eds) (1996) How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: a new model. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  10. Pan Z, Connell LD (2012) Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs: a review of analytical models and testing data. Int J Coal Geol 92:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peng D-Y, Robinson DB (1976) A new two-constant equation of state. Indus Eng Chem Fundam 15(1):59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pini R et al (2011) A model for enhanced coal bed methane recovery aimed at carbon dioxide storage. Adsorption 17(5):889–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Qu H et al (2012) Complex evolution of coal permeability during CO2 injection under variable temperatures. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 9:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Qu H et al (2014) Impact of matrix swelling area propagation on the evolution of coal permeability under coupled multiple processes. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 18:451–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Qu H et al (2017) Simulation of coal permeability under non-isothermal CO2 injection. Int J Oil Gas Coal Technol 15(2):190–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh A et al (2011) Numerical simulation of non-isothermal compositional gas flow: application to carbon dioxide injection into gas reservoirs. Energy 36(5):3446–3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas HR et al (2012) Diffusive reactive transport of multicomponent chemicals under coupled thermal, hydraulic, chemical and mechanical conditions. Geotech Geol Eng 30(4):841–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang F et al (2007) Mass transfer in coal seams for CO2 sequestration. AIChE J 53(4):1028–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu Y et al (2010) Dual poroelastic response of a coal seam to CO2 injection. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4(4):668–678MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhu W et al (2011) A model of coal-gas interaction under variable temperatures. Int J Coal Geol 86(2):213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ziabakhsh-Ganji Z, Kooi H (2014) Sensitivity of Joule-Thomson cooling to impure CO2 injection in depleted gas reservoirs. Appl Energy 113:434–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geoenvironmental Research Centre, Cardiff School of EngineeringCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations