Advertisement

Experiment on Monitoring Leakage of Landfill Leachate Through Electrical Resistivity Tomography

  • Ping Yang
  • Yao-hui LiuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Leachate leakage has become a widespread problem in most landfills due to the increasing service time. The soil property, water quality and residents’ safety around the landfill was seriously affected by the leachate leakage of landfill. A physical simulating set-up was created to simulate the leakage of leachate in the layer under the influence of flowing water. The monitoring of leachate leakage was conducted using improved electrical resistivity tomography (ERT). The result showed that the accuracy of improved ERT was more than 85% and the laboratory test relying on the simulating set-up and improved ERT was feasible. The laboratory test provides material basis for investigate the leachate diffusion quantitatively.

Keywords

Leachate leakage Electrical resistivity tomography Real-time monitoring Physical simulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Jia YG, Pan YY, Shang H, Guo XJ, Wei L, Li HJ, Shan HX (2012) Three-dimensional (3D) dynamic monitoring for an underground contamination process induced by Landfill Leakage. Environ Forensics 13:68–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christensen TH, Kjeldsen P, Albrechtsen HJ, Heron G, Nielsen PH, Bjerg PL, Holm PE (2009) Attenuation of landfill leachate pollutants in aquifers. Critical Rev Environ Sci Technol 24(2):119–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samouelian A, Tabbagh CA, Bruand A, Richard G (2004) Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil Tillage Res 83:173–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buselli G, Davis GB, Barber C, Height MI, Howard SHD (1992) The application of electromagnetic and electrical methods to groundwater problems in urban environments. Explor Geophys 23(4):543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lima OAL, Sato HK, Porsani MJ (1995) Imaging industrial contaminant plumes with resistivity techniques. J Appl Geophys 34(2):93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahlin T (1996) 2D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering application. First Break 14(7):275–283Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aristodemou E, Thomas-Betts A (2000) DC resistivity and induced polarization investigations at a waste disposal site and its environments. J Appl Geophys 44(2–3):275–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ogilvy R, Meldrum P, Chambers J, Williams G (2002) The use of 3D electrical resistivity tomography to characterise waste and leachate distribution within a closed landfill, Thriplow, UK. J Environ Eng Geophys 7(1):11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maurya PK, Ronde VK, Fiandaca G, Balbarini N, Auken E, Bjerg PL, Christiansen AV (2017) Detailed landfill leachate plume mapping using 2D and 3D electrical resistivity tomography - with correlation to ionic strength measured in screens. J Appl Geophys 138:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casado I, Mahjoub H, Lovera R, Fernandez J, Casas A (2015) Use of electrical tomography methods to determinate the extension and main migration routes of uncontrolled landfill leachates in fractured areas. Total Environ 506:546–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Konstantaki LA, Ghose R, Draganov D, Diaferia G, Heimovaara T (2015) Characterization of a heterogeneous landfill using seismic and electrical resistivity data. Geophysics 80, EN13–EN25Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vargemezis G, Tsourlos P, Giannopoulos A, Trilyrakis P (2015) 3D electrical resistivity tomography technique for the investigation of a construction and demolition waste landfill site. Geophys. Geod 59:461–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang TP, Chen CC, Tong LT, Chang PY, Chen YC, Dong TH, Liu HC, Lin CP, Yang KH, Ho CJ, Cheng SN (2015) Applying FDEM, ERT and GPR at a site with soil contamination: a case study. Appl Geophys 121:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feng SJ, Bai ZB, Cao BY, Lu SF, Ai SG (2017) The use of electrical resistivity tomography and borehole to characterize leachate distribution in Laogang landfill. China. Environmental Science and Pollution Rearch 24(25):20811–20817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bichet V, Grisey E, Aleya L (2016) Spatial characterization of leachate plume using electrical resistivity tomography in a landfill composed of old and new cells (Belfort, France). Eng Geol 211:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belmonte-Jimenez SI, Jimenez-Castaneda ME, Perez-Flores MA, Campos-Enriquez JO, Reyes-Lopez JA, Salazar-Pena L (2012) Characterization of a leachate contaminated site integrating geophysical and hydrogeological information. Geofis Int 51(4):309–321Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clement R, Oxarango L, Descloitres M (2011) Contribution of 3-D time-lapse ERT to the study of leachate recirculation in a landfill. Waste Manag 31:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Audebert M, Clement R, Duquennoi MC, Loisel S, Touze-Foltz N (2016) Understanding leachate flow in municipal solid waste landfills by combining time-lapse ERT and subsurface flow modelling - Part I: Analysis of infiltration shape on two different waste deposit cells. Waste Manag 55:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Audebert M, Oxarango L, Duquennoi C, Touze-Foltz N, Forquet N, Clement R (2016) Understanding leachate flow in municipal solid waste landfills by combining time-lapse ERT and subsurface flow modelling - Part II: Constraint methodology of hydrodynamic models. Waste Manag 55:176–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xiao K, Xue Q, Liu K (2015) Influence factor analysis of the electricity-dipole method for landfill leakage detection on HDPE membrane. Environ Earth Sci 74(7):6225–6232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations