Pozzolanic Properties of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration (MSWI) Fly Ash Under the Actions of Three Different Activators

  • Ping Chen
  • Xiao-qing Ding
  • Hao Zheng
  • Hui XuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


This study investigated the pozzolanic capacity of MSWI fly ash in the solidification process. The MSWI fly ash were solidified by using three kinds of activators, i.e., Na2CO3, CaSO4 and Na2SiO3, they were all cured for 7 and 28 days. Each of them involved two cases, i.e., the activator mixing proportions were 3 and 6% in dry mass basis, respectively. After that, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test and water immersion test were conducted on the solidified samples, to investigate the influence of the kind and proportion of activator on MSWI fly ash solidification. The results showed that all the three kinds of activators had played a role in promoting the solidification process, and the Na2CO3 performed best. The UCS value of the samples with the action of Na2CO3 enhanced with the increase of activator mixing proportion and curing time. The 28-day UCS value of the sample with Na2CO3 mixing proportions of 6% reached 2.924 MPa, and the solidified sample also showed a good water tolerance. The effect of CaSO4 on the MSWI fly ash solidification was complex. The UCS value increased with the curing time when the CaSO4 mixing proportion was 3%, however, it decreased with the curing time when the CaSO4 mixing proportion was 6%.


MSWI fly ash Pozzolanic property Activator Unconfined compressive strength Water tolerance 


  1. 1.
    Padmi T, Tanaka M, Aoyama I (2009) Chemical stabilization of medical waste fly ash using chelating agent and phosphates: heavy metals and ecotoxicity evaluation. Waste Manag 29:2065–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Song ZX, Wang LA, Lin X, Liu YY, Yuan H et al (2008) Experimental study on properties and cement solidification of municipal solidwaste incineration fly ash. Res Environ Sci 21(4):163–168Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang SQ, Huang SY (2008) Study on the hydraulic activity and alkali activation of mineral admixtures. Fly Ash Compr Util 4:6–9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shi C, Day RL (1993) Chemical activation of blended cements made with lime and natural pozzolans. Cem Concr Res 23(6):1389–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sivapullaiah PV, Baig MAA (2011) Role of gypsum in the strength development of fly ashes with lime. J Mater Civ Eng 23(2):197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bai EL, Xu JY, Li H, Zhang T et al (2014) Experiment study on the stimulating characteristics of slag-fly ash cementitious material system to different alkali-activator. Sci Technol Eng 14(1):96–99Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang ML (1999) Effect of water glass on hardening of cement slurry. Jiangxi Coal Technol 2:47–50Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jun Y, Oh JE (2015) Use of gypsum as a preventive measure for strength deterioration during curing in class F fly ash geopolymer system. Materials 8(6):3053–3067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen P, Feng B, Zhang LT (2014) Solidification of dewatered sewage sludge using bottom ash of MSWI as skeleton material. China Environ Sci 34(10):2624–2630Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureZhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations