Skip to main content

Predicting Statutes Based on Causes of Action and Content of Statutes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science (ICPCSEE 2018)

Abstract

In recent years, the Supreme People’s Court of China has vigorously promoted the information construction of the people’s court. A large number of information are stored in judgment documents, these documents contain the basic information of cases and statutes cited in cases. As far as we know, there are very few studies on the recommendation of statutes at present. We study the method by which judges choose the statutes in practical work, linking details of cases with the contents of statutes and choosing appropriate statutes to support the trial. Through data research on a large number of judgment documents, we propose a method based on the causes of action and contents of recommendation statutes, and use the Random Forest algorithm for training. In our approach, we take key words of statutes as the basic characteristics, which are used for finding more key words of documents to set up a key words dictionary for each cause of action. We use the dictionary to vector documents and train a classifier for each cause of action. We build a data set for this task and carry out evaluation experiments on the data set. The experimental results show that our method can perform well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hill, W.C., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M., Furnas, G.W.: Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1995), pp. 194–201. ACM (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., et al.: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1994), pp. 175–186. ACM (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shardanand, U., Maes, P.: Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “Word of Mouth”. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1995), pp. 210–217. ACM (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Linden, G., Smith, B., York, J.: Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput. 7(1), 76–80 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moens, M.-F.: Combining structured and unstructured information in a retrieval model for accessing legislation. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 141–144. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, W., Lee, Y., Kim, D., et al.: Ontology-based model of law retrieval system for R&D projects. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce: e-Commerce in Smart Connected World, p. 26 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosso, P., Correa, S., Buscaldi, D.: Passage retrieval in legal texts. J. Log. Algebraic Program. 80, 139–153 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-L., Ho, W.-L.: Predicting associated statutes for legal problems. Inf. Process. Manag. 51, 194–211 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Croft, W.B., Metzler, D., Strohman, T.: Search Engines - Information Retrieval in Practice. Pearson Education, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.-S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 24(5), 513–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salton, G., Allan, J., Buckley, C.: Automatic structuring and retrieval of large text files. Commun. ACM 37(2), 97–108 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., et al.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR abs/1301.3781 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bai, X., Chen, F., Zhan, S.: A study on sentiment computing and classification of Sina Weibo with Word2Vec. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Congress on Big Data, pp. 538–363. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duan, K.-B., Rajapakse, J.C., Nguyen, M.N.: One-versus-one and one-versus-all multiclass SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification. In: Marchiori, E., Moore, J.H., Rajapakse, J.C. (eds.) EvoBIO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4447, pp. 47–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71783-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Tian, L.: Individuation with standardization—to thinking of the judicial writing. Hebei Law Sci. 26(7), 160–164 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis, D.D.: Text representation for intelligent text retrieval: a classification-oriented view. In: Text-Based Intelligent Systems, pp. 179–197 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2014), pp. 1188–1196 (2014). JMLR

    Google Scholar 

  20. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, X., Pan, W., Grindle, S., et al.: A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics 6, 205 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0800803).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jidong Ge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, Z. et al. (2018). Predicting Statutes Based on Causes of Action and Content of Statutes. In: Zhou, Q., Miao, Q., Wang, H., Xie, W., Wang, Y., Lu, Z. (eds) Data Science. ICPCSEE 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 902. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2206-8_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2206-8_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2205-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2206-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics