Abstract
In recent years, the Supreme People’s Court of China has vigorously promoted the information construction of the people’s court. A large number of information are stored in judgment documents, these documents contain the basic information of cases and statutes cited in cases. As far as we know, there are very few studies on the recommendation of statutes at present. We study the method by which judges choose the statutes in practical work, linking details of cases with the contents of statutes and choosing appropriate statutes to support the trial. Through data research on a large number of judgment documents, we propose a method based on the causes of action and contents of recommendation statutes, and use the Random Forest algorithm for training. In our approach, we take key words of statutes as the basic characteristics, which are used for finding more key words of documents to set up a key words dictionary for each cause of action. We use the dictionary to vector documents and train a classifier for each cause of action. We build a data set for this task and carry out evaluation experiments on the data set. The experimental results show that our method can perform well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hill, W.C., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M., Furnas, G.W.: Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1995), pp. 194–201. ACM (1995)
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., et al.: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1994), pp. 175–186. ACM (1994)
Shardanand, U., Maes, P.: Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “Word of Mouth”. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1995), pp. 210–217. ACM (1995)
Linden, G., Smith, B., York, J.: Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput. 7(1), 76–80 (2003)
Moens, M.-F.: Combining structured and unstructured information in a retrieval model for accessing legislation. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 141–144. ACM (2005)
Kim, W., Lee, Y., Kim, D., et al.: Ontology-based model of law retrieval system for R&D projects. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce: e-Commerce in Smart Connected World, p. 26 (2016)
Rosso, P., Correa, S., Buscaldi, D.: Passage retrieval in legal texts. J. Log. Algebraic Program. 80, 139–153 (2011)
Liu, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-L., Ho, W.-L.: Predicting associated statutes for legal problems. Inf. Process. Manag. 51, 194–211 (2015)
Croft, W.B., Metzler, D., Strohman, T.: Search Engines - Information Retrieval in Practice. Pearson Education, London (2009)
Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.-S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)
Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 24(5), 513–523 (1988)
Salton, G., Allan, J., Buckley, C.: Automatic structuring and retrieval of large text files. Commun. ACM 37(2), 97–108 (1994)
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., et al.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR abs/1301.3781 (2013)
Bai, X., Chen, F., Zhan, S.: A study on sentiment computing and classification of Sina Weibo with Word2Vec. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Congress on Big Data, pp. 538–363. IEEE (2014)
Duan, K.-B., Rajapakse, J.C., Nguyen, M.N.: One-versus-one and one-versus-all multiclass SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification. In: Marchiori, E., Moore, J.H., Rajapakse, J.C. (eds.) EvoBIO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4447, pp. 47–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71783-6_5
Tian, L.: Individuation with standardization—to thinking of the judicial writing. Hebei Law Sci. 26(7), 160–164 (2008)
Lewis, D.D.: Text representation for intelligent text retrieval: a classification-oriented view. In: Text-Based Intelligent Systems, pp. 179–197 (1992)
Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2014), pp. 1188–1196 (2014). JMLR
Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)
Huang, X., Pan, W., Grindle, S., et al.: A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics 6, 205 (2005)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0800803).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, Z. et al. (2018). Predicting Statutes Based on Causes of Action and Content of Statutes. In: Zhou, Q., Miao, Q., Wang, H., Xie, W., Wang, Y., Lu, Z. (eds) Data Science. ICPCSEE 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 902. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2206-8_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2206-8_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2205-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2206-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)