Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Ankle Prosthesis Connector Adapters in 3D Printed Using PLA and PETG

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 70/1))

Abstract

The high price of adapters of lower limb prostheses and the difficulty for the purchase of this product encouraged us to develop a low-cost version using 3D printing. For printing was chosen two types of filaments: polylactic acid (PLA) and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). This work had as main objective to evaluate, through simulations and mechanical compression tests, the adapter prototypes’ maximum deformations and to identify the best material regarding mechanical resistance. The results obtained through simulations were compared with those obtained from compression tests according to Taguchi orthogonal distribution. A maximum deformation limit of 3 mm was determined, as the average size of the difference in length between the legs of a healthy individual. The maximum deformations found were 0.5976 mm for PETG mate-rial and 0.3103 mm for PLA material. Even tough PLA has shown a lower value of the deformation, PETG was chosen as printing material because no cracks or fractures were found during trials. The results satisfy the imposed maximum deformation limit and are indicators of reliability for use of this component made by 3D printing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Britannica, E.: Prosthesis. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic-/479532/prosthesis (2013). Last accessed 14 Nov 2017

  2. Britannica, E.: Prosthesis. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic-/21786/amputation (2013). Last accessed 15 Nov 2017

  3. Bernasconi, R., Natale, G., Levi, M., Magagnin, L.: Electroless plating of NiP and Cu on polylactic acid and polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified for 3D printed flexible substrates. ECS (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lipson, H., Kurman, M.: Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing. Wiley, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana (USA) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yap, J., Renda. G.: Low-cost 3D-printable prosthetic foot. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on design4health, Sheffield. https://goo.gl/v75ttz (2015). Last accessed 15 Dec 2017

  6. Chen, Y.H., Ng, C.T.: Integrated reverse engineering and rapid prototyping. Comput. Ind. Eng. 33(3–4), 481–484 (1997) apoud ULBRICH, Cristiane Brasil Lima et al. Engenharia reversa e prototipagem rapida (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dos Reis, G., Júnior, A.J.C., Da Silveira Campos, R.: Perfil epidemiológico de amputados de membros superiores e inferiores atendidos em um centro de referência (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Osejos, J.V.M.: Caracterización de materiales termoplásticos de abs y pla semi-rígido impressos em 3d com cinco mallados internos diferentes. 2016. 196f. Tese (Mestrado em Engenharia Mecânica)—Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abreu, S.A.C.: Impressão 3D baixo custo versus impressão em equipamentos de elevado custo. 2015. 259f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Mecânica)—Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Porto (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Locker, A.: PETG Filament Guide 2018—Explained, Compared and Reviewed. https://all3dp.com/1/petg-filament-3d-printing/ (2017). Last accessed 20 Mar 2018

  11. Macedo, P.: Especificações de Projeto para um Adaptador Protético de Tornozelo Impresso em 3D TCC—Universidade Estadual do Maranhão. Engenharia Mecânica, São Luís (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoppenfeld, S., Quadra, A.A.F., Vizeu, I.M.X.: Propedêutica Ortopédica: coluna e extremidades. Atheneu, São Paulo (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Button, S.T.: Metodologia para planejamento experimental e análise de resultados. Programa de pós-graduação em Engenharia Mecânica—Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Silva, A., Guilhon, D. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Ankle Prosthesis Connector Adapters in 3D Printed Using PLA and PETG. In: Costa-Felix, R., Machado, J., Alvarenga, A. (eds) XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 70/1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2119-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2119-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2118-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2119-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics