Abstract
This chapter explores the mechanisms by which academic subjects willingly make themselves amenable to measurement. It explores how measurement is deployed via practices that commodify academic labour and promote an individualising and competitive milieu that is simultaneously experienced as repellent and desirable. In particular, it examines the complicity of the academic subject, who becomes increasingly willing to be formed and to form herself into a figure that might be described as the measured monster of the contemporary university . Exhibits from job and promotion applications, software programs and citation collation websites are explored for traces of this monstrous subject. Monstrous , in this sense, is less like the monstrous creature of great leathery wings and a horny head, or the misshapen freak, than the neat clean numerical subject delineated by measurements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altmetric. (November 24, 2016). How is the altmetric attention score calculated? Blog https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000060969-how-is-the-altmetric-score-calculated. Accessed February 10, 2007.
Blaise, M., Gray, E. & Knight, L. (2017). Feminist educators against sexism: #FEAS cite club. https://feministeducatorsagainstsexism.com/cite-club/. Accessed July 6, 2017.
Brabazon, T., & Murray, E. (2015). I think she’s decided to be a manager now: Women, management and leadership in the knowledge factory. Journal of Womens’ Entrepreneurship and Education, 3–4, 28–53.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1986). Kafka: Toward a minor literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. (1990). Postscript on control societies. In G. Deleuze, Negotiations, 1972–1990 (pp. 177–182) (M. Joughin Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Etymology Online. (2017). Monster. http://www.etymonline.com. Accessed February 10, 2017.
Felt, U. (2017). Under the shadow of time: Where indicators and academic values meet. Engaging Science, Technology and Society, 3, 53–63.
Fochler, M., & De Riscke, S. (2017). Implicated in the indicator game? An experimental debate. Engaging Science, Technology and Society, 3, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.108
Fox News. (Feb 14, 2017). Twitter account mocking ‘questionable’ left-wing papers is shrouded in secrecy amid threats of hacking. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/02/14/twitter-account-mocking-questionable-left-wing-papers-is-shrouded-in-secrecy-amid-threats-hacking.html. Accessed May 13, 2017.
Henderson, L., Honan, E., & Loch, S. (2016). The production of the academic writing machine. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 7(2), 4–18.
Irwin, A. (2017). If the indicator game is the answer, then what is the question? Engaging Science, Technology and Society, 3, 64–72.
Kamler, B. (2010). Revise and resubmit. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond. London: Routledge.
Kamuf, P. (2007). Accounterability. Textual Practice, 21(2), 251–266.
Kreker, P., Jordan, K., & Lex, E. (Dec 11, 2015). Research gate score: Good example of a bad metric. http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2015/12/researchgate-score-good-example-of-a-bad-metric/ Accessed February 10, 2017.
Moore, P. (2014). Tracking bodies, the quantified self and the corporeal turn. In K. van der Pijl (Ed.), The handboook of the international political economy of production (pp. 394–408). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2016). The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2774–2792.
Orduna-Malea, E., MartÃn-MartÃn, A., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2016). Metrics in academic profiles: A new addictive game for researchers?. Revista espanola de salud publica, 90(1).
Peseta, T., Barrie, S., & McLean, J. (2017). Academic life in the measured university: Pleasures, paradoxes and politics. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(3), 453–457.
Reigeluth, T. (2014). Why data is not enough: Digital traces as control of self and self-control. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 243.
Whitson, J. (2013) Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance and Society 11(1/2).
Wilsdon, J., et al. (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.4929.1363.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gannon, S. (2018). On Being and Becoming the Monstrous Subject of Measurement. In: Riddle, S., Bright, D., Honan, E. (eds) Writing with Deleuze in the Academy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2065-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2065-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2064-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2065-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)