Advertisement

Competitive Projects and Their Design Outcomes

Chapter
  • 225 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter summarises and evaluates the development scale and design outcomes of the Competitive Design Policy (CDP) that has involved nearly 50 projects since the turn of the century. The policy has been applied to the largest and highest, and often the most expensive private property projects across central Sydney. The development parameters, design attributes and locational distribution insure that the design competitions have remade central Sydney as a global Central Business District (CBD). Along the way, the year 2012 marked a dividing line in terms of property market shift, policy sophistication and procedural maturation. The completed and approved projects demonstrate a clear articulation between design excellence and global competitiveness: the recent and high-profile projects for tenants of the global advanced producer services (APS) tend to present better design quality and outcome.

Bibliography

  1. 3XN. (2018a). How do we humanize the high-rise? Retrieved from http://3xn.com/project/quay-quarter-tower-2
  2. 3XN. (2018b). A new urban landmark. Retrieved from http://3xn.com/project/bremen-tower/
  3. Abbott, C. (1991). Urban design in Portland, Oregon, as policy and process: 1960–1989. Planning Perspectives, 6(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acuto, M. (2012). Ain’t about politics? The wicked power-geometry of Sydney’s greening governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(2), 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adamczyk, E. (2015). Practising architecture in global Sydney: Re-theorising the architecture of the global city. In P. Burton & H. Shearer (Eds.), State of Australian Cities Conference 2015: Refereed Proceedings, Gold Coast, QLD.Google Scholar
  6. Adams, D. (1994). Urban planning and the development process. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2013). Shaping places: Urban planning, design and development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Alexander, I. (1974). The city centre. Perth: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
  9. Alexander, A. (2009). Britain’s new towns: Garden cities to sustainable communities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Alexander, E. R., & Witzling, L. P. (1990). Planning and urban design competitions: Introduction and overview. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7(2), 91–104.Google Scholar
  11. Alexander, E. R., Casper, D. J., & Witzling, L. P. (1990). Competitions for planning and urban design: Lessons of experience. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7(2), 142–159.Google Scholar
  12. Al-Kodmany, K., & Ali, M. M. (2013). The future of the city: Tall buildings and urban design. Billerica: WIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Allen, L. (1996, August 22). Lend Lease’s Italian architect splits locals. The Australian, p. 28.Google Scholar
  14. Altshuler, A. A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  15. American Institute of Architects. (2010). The handbook of architectural design competitions. Retrieved from https://network.aia.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=a808a388-14e2-430d-beb5-8d6ad49b56f1&forceDialog=0
  16. Andersons, A. (1988). Circular Quay: The image of the city. In P. Webber (Ed.), The design of Sydney: Three decades of change in the city centre (pp. 158–175). Sydney: Sydney: Law Book Company.Google Scholar
  17. Andersson, J. E., Kazemian, R., & Rönn, M. (2009). Architectural competitions: Editor’s notes. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 21(2/3), 5–8.Google Scholar
  18. Andersson, J. E., Zettersten, G. B., & Rönn, M. (2016). Architectural competitions as institution and process. Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology and Kulturlandskapet.Google Scholar
  19. Anon. (1971, July 21). A plan for every part of the city [Supplement]. Sydney Morning Herald. Copy in George Clarke papers. Folder 41, Newspaper Clippings, 1970–1972, State Library of NSW, ML MSS 9795.Google Scholar
  20. Architects’ Council of Europe. (2010). Architectural design contest. Retrieved from https://www.ace-cae.eu/uploads/tx_jidocumentsview/ADCMasterDoc.pdf
  21. Ashton, P. (1992). Planning Sydney: Nine planners remember. Sydney: Council of the City of Sydney.Google Scholar
  22. Ashton, P. (1993). The accidental city, planning Sydney since 1788. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNSW SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.University of CanberraCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations