Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Global Sydney: Economy, Planning and Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Designing the Global City

  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter contextualises global Sydney under the dual forces of the global economy and neoliberal urbanism. Global Sydney is most captured in the economic and spatial transformations in the central city area: the concentration of advanced producer services (APS), the verticalisation of urban forms and urban redevelopment hotspots. These transformations have been facilitated by decades of neoliberalist planning strategies and entrepreneurial governance approaches, which have involved an increasing use of urban design. Sydney’s complex planning systems, urban morphological legacy and constraining physical environment present a very challenging setting for large-scale commercial development, and the pursuit for design excellence. The city’s competitive design policy has evolved as an adaptive response to these circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • 3XN. (2018a). How do we humanize the high-rise? Retrieved from http://3xn.com/project/quay-quarter-tower-2

  • 3XN. (2018b). A new urban landmark. Retrieved from http://3xn.com/project/bremen-tower/

  • Abbott, C. (1991). Urban design in Portland, Oregon, as policy and process: 1960–1989. Planning Perspectives, 6(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acuto, M. (2012). Ain’t about politics? The wicked power-geometry of Sydney’s greening governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(2), 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamczyk, E. (2015). Practising architecture in global Sydney: Re-theorising the architecture of the global city. In P. Burton & H. Shearer (Eds.), State of Australian Cities Conference 2015: Refereed Proceedings, Gold Coast, QLD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D. (1994). Urban planning and the development process. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2013). Shaping places: Urban planning, design and development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, I. (1974). The city centre. Perth: University of Western Australia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, A. (2009). Britain’s new towns: Garden cities to sustainable communities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, E. R., & Witzling, L. P. (1990). Planning and urban design competitions: Introduction and overview. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7(2), 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, E. R., Casper, D. J., & Witzling, L. P. (1990). Competitions for planning and urban design: Lessons of experience. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7(2), 142–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kodmany, K., & Ali, M. M. (2013). The future of the city: Tall buildings and urban design. Billerica: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L. (1996, August 22). Lend Lease’s Italian architect splits locals. The Australian, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler, A. A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Architects. (2010). The handbook of architectural design competitions. Retrieved from https://network.aia.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=a808a388-14e2-430d-beb5-8d6ad49b56f1&forceDialog=0

  • Andersons, A. (1988). Circular Quay: The image of the city. In P. Webber (Ed.), The design of Sydney: Three decades of change in the city centre (pp. 158–175). Sydney: Sydney: Law Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. E., Kazemian, R., & Rönn, M. (2009). Architectural competitions: Editor’s notes. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 21(2/3), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. E., Zettersten, G. B., & Rönn, M. (2016). Architectural competitions as institution and process. Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology and Kulturlandskapet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1971, July 21). A plan for every part of the city [Supplement]. Sydney Morning Herald. Copy in George Clarke papers. Folder 41, Newspaper Clippings, 1970–1972, State Library of NSW, ML MSS 9795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Architects’ Council of Europe. (2010). Architectural design contest. Retrieved from https://www.ace-cae.eu/uploads/tx_jidocumentsview/ADCMasterDoc.pdf

  • Ashton, P. (1992). Planning Sydney: Nine planners remember. Sydney: Council of the City of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. (1993). The accidental city, planning Sydney since 1788. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2001). 2001 census data. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/historicaldata2001?opendocument

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Table builder: Australian census 2011. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Pyrmont – Ultimo (SA2) (117031334). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from http://stat.abs.gov.au/itt/r.jsp?RegionSummary&region=117031334&dataset=ABS_REGIONAL_ASGS&geoconcept=REGION&measure=MEASURE&datasetASGS=ABS_REGIONAL_ASGS&datasetLGA=ABS_NRP9_LGA&regionLGA=REGION&regionASGS=REGION

  • Australian Government. (2011). Creating places for people: An urban design protocol for Australian cities. Retrieved from https://urbandesign.org.au/content/uploads/2015/08/INFRA1219_MCU_R_SQUARE_URBAN_PROTOCOLS_1111_WEB_FA2.pdf

  • Australian Institute of Architects. (2011, April 21). Draft competitive design policy. Submission to the City of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Architects. (2015). Architectural competitions policy. Retrieved from https://repository.architecture.com.au/download/archive/documents_and_files/national-policy/Architectural-_Competitions_Policy_Final_Adopted_17_Apr_-2015.pdf

  • Baker, S. (2014). The City of Sydney strategic plan 1971: Analysis and evaluation of a noteworthy strategic plan. MPlan thesis, University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, T., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (1990). Competitions as a design method: An inquiry. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7(2), 114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (1974). Urban design as public policy: Practical methods for improving cities. New York: Architectural Record Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (2003). Redesigning cities: Principles, practice, implementation. Chicago: American Planning Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (2011). How codes shaped development in the United States, and why they should be changed. In S. Marshall (Ed.), Urban coding and planning (pp. 201–226). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S. (1997). Sydney, Australia: A global city? Testing the social polarisation thesis. Urban Studies, 34(11), 1881–1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaverstock, J. V., Taylor, P. J., & Smith, R. G. (1999). A roster of world cities. Cities, 16(6), 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, C. (2014). The contingent public value of ‘good design’: Regulating the aesthetics of the Australian urban built environment. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73(2), 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I. (1999). Cities and competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36(5/6), 795–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Joseph, E. (2005). The code of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, I. (1999). Urban transformations: Power, people and urban design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S., & Smith, G. (1985). Responsive environments: A manual for designers. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento, J. F. (2012). Survey on architectural policies in Europe. Brussels: European Forum for Architectural Policies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bern, A. (2018). Architecture competitions in an urban planning context. Journal of Urban Design, 23(2), 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham-Hall, P. (1999). Olympic architecture: Building Sydney 2000. Sydney: Watermark Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaesser, B. (1994). The abuse of discretionary power. In B. Scheer & W. Preiser (Eds.), Design review: Challenging urban aesthetic control (pp. 42–50). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bleby, M. (2013, November 8). Elevated 8 Chifley bad for city, say planners. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/elevated-8-chifley-bad-for-city-say-planners-20131108-2x5iq.html

  • Bleby, M. (2017, November 3). 200 George Street tops architecture awards. Australian Financial Review, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blythe, T. (2018, February 12). The transformation of Circular Quay. Talk to the Australian Institute of Urban Studies (NSW), Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, P. (2017). On the waterfront: Neoliberal urbanism and the politics of public benefit. Cities, 61, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bounds, M., & Morris, A. (2005). High-rise gentrification: The redevelopment of Pyrmont Ultimo. Urban Design International, 10(3–4), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bounds, M., & Morris, A. (2006). Second wave gentrification in inner-city Sydney. Cities, 23(2), 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (Eds.). (2002). Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, B. E. (1989). Foreword. In T. Vonier (Ed.), In search of design excellence (p. iii). Washington, DC: American Institute of Architects Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2009, November/December). Why SEPP 65 – and not much else – Makes New South Wales the apartment capital of the nation. Architecture Bulletin, pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2014, December 13). Property heavyweights circle $1b Sydney block. The Australian, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2015, March 19). Old firm relishes design challenge from abroad. The Australian, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2016). Circular Quay: Architectural views and visions. Architecture Bulletin, Winter-Spring. On-line issue. Retrieved from http://architecturebulletin.com.au/winter-spring-2016/circular-quay-architectural-views-and-visions/

  • Bryan, D., McGuirk, P., O’Neill. P., & Stilwell, F. (2005). Understanding Sydney as a global city. State of Australian Cities Conference, Brisbane. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/system/files/60315/apo-nid60315-33281.pdf

  • Building Products News. (1972, December). If all goes well … Sydney will be one of the world’s great cities. Building Products News. Copy in George Clarke papers. Folder 41, Newspaper Clippings, 1970–1972, State Library of NSW, ML MSS 9795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, R., & Searle, G. (2007). Seeking certainty: Recent planning for Sydney and Melbourne. Town Planning Review, 78(5), 619–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, R., Freestone, R., & Randolph, B. (2018). Sydney: Growth, globalization and governance. In S. Hamnett & R. Freestone (Eds.), Planning metropolitan Australia (pp. 76–100). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (2001, August 31). You’ve insulted our profession, rejected architects tell Sartor. Sydney Morning Herald, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, S. (1998, May). Urban design policy. Architecture Bulletin, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, S. (2001, January/February). City of Sydney – Design excellence DCP. Architecture Bulletin, p. 20, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J., Chandler, B., & Echberg, B. (Eds.). (2013). Urban voices: Celebrating urban design in Australia. Melbourne: Urban Design Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • CABE. (2001). The value of urban design. London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • CABE. (2006). Design review: How CABE evaluates quality in architecture and urban design. London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002). Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory, 1(2), 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candalepas, A. (2014, Winter). Taking first place: The role of representation in winning competitions. Architecture Bulletin (NSW), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrill, P. J. (2016, January–February). Australia towers. Architecture Australia, pp. 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2009). Design coding and the creative, market and regulatory tyrannies of practice. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2643–2667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2011). Decoding design guidance. In T. Banerjee & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), Companion to urban design (pp. 288–303). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2016). Design governance: Theorising an urban design sub-field. Journal of Urban Design, 21(6), 705–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. (2017). The formal and informal tools of design governance. Journal of Urban Design, 22(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., de Magalhães, C., & Edwards, M. (2002). Stakeholder views on value and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 7(2), 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., de Magalhães, C., & Hammond, L. (2008). Public space: The management dimension. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (2010). Public places-urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M., de Magalhães, C., & Natarajan, L. (2017). Design governance: The CABE experiment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Sydney Plan Unit. (1988). Central Sydney strategy. Sydney: NSW Department of Planning and Council of the City of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney, I. (2007). The politics of design: Architecture, tall buildings and the skyline of central London. Area, 39(2), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charter Keck Cramer. (2017). Sydney CBD: Differentiating its economic strengths. A report for the Greater Sydney Commission. Retrieved from https://gsc-public-1.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/sydney_cbd_-_differentiating_its_economic_strengths_-_charter_keck_cramer_-_june_2017.pdf

  • Cheng, L. (2018, April 26). Six international teams vie to design $2b Melbourne Southbank development. Architecture AU. Retrieved from https://architectureau.com/articles/six-international-teams-vie-to-design-2b-melbourne-southbank-development/

  • Cheshire, P. C. (2013). Land market regulation: Market versus policy failures. Journal of Property Research, 30(3), 170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, M. C. (2010). A spectrum of urban design roles. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chupin, J.-P., Cucuzzella, C., & Helal, B. (Eds.). (2015). Architecture competitions and the production of culture, quality and knowledge. Montreal: Potential Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIE. (2013). Reform of the NSW planning system: Better regulation statement, prepared for NSW Planning and Infrastructure. Canberra: The Centre for International Economics. Retrieved from: http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Portals/0/planningsystem/CIE_Better_Regulation_Statement.pdf

  • City of Sydney. (1971). City of Sydney strategic plan. Sydney: Council of the City of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Sydney. (1991). City of Sydney 2020. Sydney: Council of the City of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Sydney. (1994). Living city. Sydney: Council of the City of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Sydney. (1995). Sydney spaces. Sydney: Council of the City of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Sydney. (1999a, May 10). Minutes. Minute by the Lord Mayor. City open day proposal. Item 2B. Retrieved from http://meetings-archive.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/documents/meetings/1999/cl100599.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Robert Freestone & Gethin Davison

  2. University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Richard Hu

Authors
  1. Robert Freestone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gethin Davison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Freestone, R., Davison, G., Hu, R. (2019). Global Sydney: Economy, Planning and Environment. In: Designing the Global City. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2056-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2056-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2055-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2056-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation