Advertisement

Aeronautical Assisted IoT Implementation: Route Lifetime and Load Capacity Perspective

  • Kirshna KumarEmail author
  • Pankaj Kumar Kashyap
  • Sushil Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 899)

Abstract

Aeronautical ad hoc networks (AANET) support IoT while allowing communication between aircraft and the ground in flight systems. Current research is focused on aeronautical data-based IoT applications thus leaving the gap between benefits and services of IoT objects and aeronautical objects. In the present scenario, quality of service provisioning is the most prominent requirements in aeronautical flight communication systems. For this perspective, in this paper we propose QoS aware routing protocol (QSRP) to enhance network performance in Aeronautical ad hoc networks assisted IoT environment. The proposed QSRP includes two QoS metrics: route availability period and residual route load capacity for route finding process and describes a broadcast optimization technique to reduce traffic overhead. Finally, the performance of the proposed QSPR is compared with AODV and GPSR in terms of ground connectivity, packet delivery ratio and route load balancing. The simulation results prove that the performance of QSRP is better as compared to state of arts protocols.

Keywords

Internet of Things Routing Quality of service AANET Load balancing 

References

  1. 1.
    Islam, S.M.R., Kwak, D., Kabir, M.H., Hossain, M., Kwak, S.K.: The Internet of Things for health care: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 3, 678–708 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schnell, M., Scalise, S.: NEWSKY-Concept for networking the SKY for civil aeronautical communications. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 22(5), 25–29 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vey, Q., Pirovano, A., Radzik, J., Garcia, F.: Aeronautical ad hoc network for civil aviation. In: Communication Technologies for Vehicles, pp. 81–93. Springer, Cham (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia, F., Pirovano, A., Royer, M., Vey, Q.: Aeronautical air-ground data communication: current and future trends. Clean Mobility Intell. Transp. Syst., 40–416 (2015). IET Digit. Libr., UKGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karp, B., Kung, H.T.: GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing Network, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 243–254 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E., Das, S.: Ad hoc on Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing (RFC3561). http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt. Accessed 30 Jan 2013
  8. 8.
    Iordanakis, M., et al.: Ad-hoc routing protocol for aeronautical mobile ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Communication System Network. Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP), Patras, Greece, pp. 543–547 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Medina, D., Hoffmann, F., Rossetto, F., Rokitansky, C.H.: A geographic routing strategy for North Atlantic in-flight Internet access via airborne mesh networking. ACM Trans. Netw. 20(4), 1231–1244 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lei, L., Wang, D., Zhou, L., Chen, X., Cai, S.: Link availability estimation based reliable routing for aeronautical ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 20, 53–63 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gu, W., Li, J., He, F., Cai, F., Yang, F.: Delay-aware stable routing protocol for aeronautical ad hoc networks. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 9(2), 347–360 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sakhaee, E., Jamalipour, A.: The global in-flight Internet. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 24(9), 1748–1757 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sakhaee, E., Jamalipour, A., Kato, N.: Multipath Doppler routing with QoS support in pseudo-linear highly mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, Istanbul, Turkey, vol. 8, pp. 3566–3571 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jabbar, A., Sterbenz, J.P.G.: AeroRP: A geolocation assisted aeronautical routing protocol for highly dynamic telemetry environments. In: Proceedings of the International Telemetering Conference (ITC), Las Vegas, October 2009Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, S., et al.: A-GR: A novel geographical routing protocol for AANETs. J. Sys. Archit. 59(10), 931–937 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Su, W., Lee, S.J., Gerla, M.: Mobility prediction and routing in ad hoc wireless networks. Int. J. Netw. Manag. 11(1), 3–30 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirshna Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pankaj Kumar Kashyap
    • 1
  • Sushil Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Wireless Communication and Networking Research Lab, School of Computer and Systems SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations