An Innovative Approach to Assess Sustainability of Urban Mobility—Using Fuzzy MCDM Method

  • Partha TripathyEmail author
  • Anjali K. Khambete
  • Krupesh A. Chauhan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure book series (LNITI)


Urban mobility is one of the toughest challenges faced by the cities in the developing world and mobility is a key dynamic of urbanization. Cities have been major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and personal transport dependencies have been a concern. Government at federal level and state level have been trying to put in place a robust mobility system to control this menace. Without a proper performance measurement of urban mobility, it is difficult to identify and solve these problems. Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India have adopted a framework to benchmark cities designing a set of Service Level Benchmarks and aggregate them to find out an Index. In this paper, an attempt has been made to deliberate on creating a performance measurement framework for Urban Mobility Index (UMI) using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach. A comparison of both the approach has been made by analyzing the UMI for 12 Indian cities. The paper identifies certain indicators which measure the sustainability as well as smartness of a city from the perspective of Urban Mobility. These indicators and the UMI can be used to asses the progress on city performance and corrective actions could be taken.


Sustainability Mobility indicators Mobility index Fuzzy MCDM 



The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Mr. Rajeev K R, Research Student, M Tech Urban Planning, SVNIT (2014–16).


  1. 1.
    Ministry of Urban Development and G. of I. N. Delhi (2015) Service level benchmarking in urban transport for Indian citiesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smart City_Reference Framework For India [Online]. Accessed 01 Dec 2015
  3. 3.
    Singh D, Tiong RLK (2005) A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection. J Constr Eng Manag 131(1):62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klir GJ, Folger TA (1988) Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and informationGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen VYC, Lien H-P, Liu C-H, Liou JJH, Tzeng G-H, Yang L-S (2011) Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan. Appl Soft Comput 11(1):265–275Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lad RK, Christian RA, Deshpande AW (2008) A fuzzy MCDM framework for the environmental pollution potential of industries focusing on air pollution. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 116:617–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khambete MAK, Christian RA (2014) Ranking sewage treatment plants with the application of fuzzy composite programming. Int J Sci Eng Technol 3(2):116–120Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chor H, Kumar A, Kong H, Use L, Hong T, Chin HC, Debnath AK, Yuen B (2010) The concept of smart citiesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ITU (2015) Key performance indicators related to the use of information and communication technology in smart sustainable cities. In: Proceedings of the international conference on sustainable urbanization, 15–17 December 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Partha Tripathy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anjali K. Khambete
    • 1
  • Krupesh A. Chauhan
    • 1
  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentSardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations