Abstract
Neoliberalism has been increasing its impact on the educational policy landscapes in many nations in a way that leads to emphasize test-based accountability mandates. In the USA, the federal government has been gradually strengthening its accountability control by implementing high-stakes testing and using student performance data for teacher evaluation. Accordingly, teacher education programs are facing intense demands to produce high-quality teachers who are capable of improving student performance. Yet many teacher education programs in the USA tend to emphasize different pedagogy, such as culturally responsive teaching and constructivist methods, that is, often in conflict with the practices favored by the accountability mandates. Acknowledging that this tendency may cause a significant challenge to beginning teachers who are new to the profession, this chapter analyzes the preservice learning and current practices of three American beginning teachers who work in three different levels of accountability contexts: high, moderate, and low accountability. Using the framework of teacher learning by Cochran-Smith and Lytle (1999), it indicates there was a disconnection between the teachers’ preservice education and their current practices, regardless of their accountability contexts and the preparation they went through. It suggests that developing teacher candidates’ ‘inquiry stance’ can be considered as this approach encourages them to lead their professional learning individually and collectively by questioning the taken-for-granted practices and deliberating on ways to improve their practices within and against the challenging accountability landscapes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. (2012). New teachers of color and culturally responsive teaching in an era of educational accountability: Caught in a double bind. Journal of Educational Change, 13(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9165-y.
Agee, J. (2004). Negotiating a teaching identity: An African American teacher’s struggle to teach in test-driven contexts. Teachers College Record, 106(4), 747–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00357.x.
Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the ‘right’ way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becomming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London, England: Falmer.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249–305.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., Piazza, P., & Power, C. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 6–27.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Imig, D. G., & Imig, S. R. (2006). What do beginning teachers need to know? An essay. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 286–291.
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323.
Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405.
Kumashiro, K. K. (2012). Bad teacher!: How blaming teachers distorts the bigger picture. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Lampert, M. (2009). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 21–34.
Lewis, W. D., & Young, T. V. (2013). The politics of accountability: Teacher education policy. Educational Policy, 27(2), 190–216.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Paugh, P. C. (2006). Making sense of ‘conflicting observations’: Teachers, tests, and the power of collaborative inquiry in urban schools. New Educator, 2(1), 15–31.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
Spring, J. (2010). The politics of American education. New York, NY: Routledge.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2016). About the standards. Retrieved January 13, 2018 from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/.
Tuck, E. (2013). Neoliberalism as nihilism? A commentary on educational accountability, teacher education and school reform. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(2), 324–347.
Ulvik, M., Smith, K., & Helleve, I. (2009). Novice in secondary school—The coin has two sides. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 835–842.
Valli, L., & Chambliss, M. (2007). Creating classroom cultures: One teacher, two lessons, and a high-stakes test. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 38(1), 57–75.
Wang, J., & Fulton, L. A. (2012). Mentor-novice relationships and learning to teach in teacher induction: A critical review of research. REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 56–104.
Watanabe, M. (2007). Displaced teacher and state priorities in a high-stakes accountability context. Educational Policy, 21(2), 311–368.
Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ro, J. (2018). Lost in Transition: Learning to Teach in the Era of Test-Based Accountability. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Adie, L. (eds) Innovation and Accountability in Teacher Education. Teacher Education, Learning Innovation and Accountability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2026-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2026-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2025-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2026-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)