Abstract
This chapter discusses how beginning teachers perceive their preparedness for work, drawing on findings from the Studying the Effectiveness of Teacher Education (SETE) project (Mayer et al. 2017). The goal of this large-scale, longitudinal project was to explore graduate teachers’ experiences in Australia in order to understand their perceptions of teacher preparation and teaching in the early years of their career. In doing so, the study sought to understand: first, how effective graduates and principals perceived teacher education programs to be in preparing the graduates for the diverse settings in which they take up teaching employment; second, whether there were any aspects of the teacher education programs that seemed to be linked to their preparedness for teaching and their effectiveness as beginning teachers; and third, the career and employment pathways of the new teachers as well as retention and attrition. In this chapter, the focus is on the teachers’ experience of perception as they transition across professional spaces between universities and schools. The transitional synthesis of perceptions has wide-ranging implications for understanding the utility of teacher education in and through situated experiences of beginning teachers in schools.
Perception is not a science of the world, it is not even an act, a deliberate taking up of a position; it is the background from which all acts stand out, and is presupposed by them.
Merleau-Ponty 1962, p. xi
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved January 11, 2018 from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/general/australian-professional-standands-for-teachers-20171006.pdf?sfvrsn=399ae83c_12.
Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., & McIntyre, D. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Doyon, M., & Breyer, T. (Eds.). (2015). Normativity in perception. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. (1996). Perspectives on learning to teach. In F. Murray (Ed.), A knowledge base for teacher educators (pp. 63–91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gitomer, D., & Bell., C. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6.
Heidegger, M. (1962/2008). Being and time. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Jordan, J. (1998). System theories and a priori aspects of perception. Burlington, NJ: Elsevier Science.
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.
Klieme, E. & Vieluf, S. (2009). Teaching practices, teachers’ beliefs and attitudes. In Indicators and Analysis Division of the OECD Directorate for Education (Eds.), Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS (pp. 87–124). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Kline, J., & Walker-Gibbs, B. (2015). Graduate teacher preparation for rural schools in Victoria and Queensland. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v40n3.5.
Matthen, M. (Ed.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Mayer, D., Dixon, M., Kline, J., Kostogriz, A., Moss, J., Rowan, L., et al. (2017). Studying the effectiveness of teacher education: Early career teachers in diverse settings. Singapore: Springer.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/2002). Phenomenology of perception. London, England: Routledge.
Rowan, L., Mayer, D., Kline, J., Kostogriz, A., & Walker-Gibbs, B. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of teacher education for early career teachers in diverse settings: The longitudinal research we have to have. The Australian Educational Researcher, 42(3), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0163-y.
Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education and Training.
Acknowledgements
The Studying the Effectiveness of Teacher Education project was supported by a strong partnership involving the Victorian Institute of Teaching (VIT), the Queensland College of Teachers (QCT), the Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD, now the Department of Education and Training), the Queensland Department of Education Training and Employment (QDETE), Deakin University’s School of Education in Victoria, and Griffith University’s School of Education and Professional Studies in Queensland. This research was supported under Australian Research Council’s Linkage Projects funding scheme (project LP110100003). The views expressed herein are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the other members of the research team, the Australian Research Council or the Industry Partners. The project team consisted of Diane Mayer (Victoria University/Sydney University), Brenton Doecke (Deakin University), Mary Dixon (Deakin University), Alex Kostogriz (Monash University), Andrea Allard (Deakin University), Simone White (Queensland University of Technology), Bernadette Walker-Gibbs (Deakin University), Leonie Rowan (Griffith University), Jodie Kline (Deakin University), Julianne Moss (Deakin University), and Phillipa Hodder (Deakin University).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kostogriz, A. (2018). Early Career Teachers’ Perceptions of Initial Teacher Education. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Adie, L. (eds) Innovation and Accountability in Teacher Education. Teacher Education, Learning Innovation and Accountability. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2026-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2026-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2025-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2026-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)