Skip to main content

The Theoretical Basis for Expanding Environmental Human Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Human Rights and Climate Change

Abstract

The concept of a human right to an environment of a particular quality intuitively appeals to those who wish to secure greater protection for the natural world and to promote an enhanced understanding of humans’ relationship with it. Yet questions abound as to how such a right should be defined and how we can justify a good environment as something which ought to be characterised as a human right. This chapter considers a number of theories which explain what human rights are and why they warrant protection, and analyses whether any of them could support the notion of a right to a good environment. In seeking a theoretical rationale for the right to a good environment, the chapter identifies the need to exclude explanations which rely on the environmental dimensions of other rights, on the basis that human rights require some independent justification beyond merely providing instrumental benefit to the enjoyment of other rights. The chapter argues that it is extremely problematic to provide an account of the right to a good environment which demonstrates its essentiality for human dignity, autonomy or well-being without describing its value in terms of facilitating other rights. Consequently, it is difficult to find a home for the right within conventional human rights theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such scholars include Richard Bilder, Phillip Alston, John Finnis, Jack Donnelly, Maurice Cranston, Charles Beitz, Karel Vasek, Vernon van Dyke, Dinah Shelton, Linda Hajjar Leib, Stephen Marks, D.N. MacCormick, Joel Feinberg, W.N. Hohfeld and John Rawls.

  2. 2.

    The Preamble of the UDHR states: ‘Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.’ The inherent dignity of the person is also recognised in preambles of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966), which both recognise ‘that these rights derive from the inherent dignity of the human person’.

  3. 3.

    The right to development was first proposed by the Commission on Human Rights in 1977 (Resolution 4 (XXXIII) (21 February 1977)) and was later enshrined in the Declaration on the Right to Development, a resolution passed by the General Assembly in 1986 (GA Res 41/128). It is not recognised in any international treaty but it has received widespread support and was recognised by a consensus of States at the Vienna World Conference on Human Rights in 1993 as a ‘universal and inalienable right’: Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (1993).

  4. 4.

    For further discussion of the application of human rights to future generations see Joel Feinberg (1981); Partridge (1990); Bell (2011); Gosseries (2008).

References

Treaties and Legislation

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1577 UNTS 3, opened for signature 20 November 1989, entered into force 2 September 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 999 UNTS 171, opened for signature 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 993 UNTS 3, opened for signature 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976

    Google Scholar 

International Documents

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights, General Assembly Resolution 217A (III), 3rd session, 183rd plen mtg, UN Doc A/810 (10 December 1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Human Rights, Resolution 4 (XXXIII), UN Doc E/CN.4/1257 (21 February 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • General Assembly Resolution 41/128, Declaration on the Right to Development, 41st session, 97th plen mtg, UN DOC A/Res/41/128 (4 December 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna, UN Doc A/CONF.157/23 (25 June 1993)

    Google Scholar 

Articles and Books

  • Alston P (1982) Conjuring up new rights: a proposal for quality control. Am J Int Law 78(3):607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston P (1985) The shortcomings of a ‘Garfield the Cat’ approach to the right to development. Calif West Int Law J 15:510

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston P (1988) Making space for new rights: the case of the right to development. Harv Hum Rights Yearb 1:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston P, Goodman R (2013) International human rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Atapattu S (2002–2003) The right to a healthy life or the right to die polluted? The emergence of a Human Right to a healthy environment under international law. Tulane Environ Law J 16:65

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz C (2003) What human rights mean. Daedalus 132(1):36

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz C (2009) The idea of human rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell D (2011) Does anthropogenic climate change violate human rights? Crit Rev Int Soc Polit Philos 14(2):99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham J (1998) Anarchical fallacies. Headline Series Winter: 56 (first published 1816)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake M (2008) International justice. In: The Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/international-justice

  • Breakey H (2018) It’s right, it fits, we debated, we decided, i agree, it’s ours and it works: the gathering confluence of human rights legitimacy. Law Philos 37(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown Weiss E (1989) In fairness to future generations: international law, common patrimony, and intergenerational equity. Transnational, Dobbs Ferry, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlie I (1985) The rights of peoples in modern international law. Bull Aust Soc Legal Philos 9:104

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney S (2006) Cosmopolitan justice, rights and global climate change. Can J Law Jurisprud 19:255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney S (2008) Human rights, climate change and discounting. Environ Politics 17(4):536

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston M (1973) What are human rights? Taplinger, Great Neck, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford C (1988) The rights of peoples. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullet P (1995) Definition of an environmental right in a human rights context. Neth Q Hum Rights 13:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall B, Sessions G (1985) Deep Ecology. Gibbs Smith, Layton

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly J (1982) Human rights as natural rights. Hum Rights Q 4:391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly J (1984) Human rights and development: complementary or competing concerns? World Polit 36(2):255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly J (1985a) In search of the unicorn: the jurisprudence and politics of the right to development. Calif West Int Law J 15:474

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly J (1985b) The theology of the right to development: a reply to Alston. Calf West Int Law J 15:519

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly J (2007) The relative universality of human rights. Hum Rights Q 29:281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs J (1993) A healthy and ecologically balanced environment: an argument for a third generation right. Duke J Comp Int Law 3:351

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1971) The rights of animals and future generations. In: Paper presented at the fourth annual conference in philosophy, University of Georgia, 18 Feb 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1981) The rights of animals and unborn generations. In: Partridge E (ed) Responsibilities to future generations: environmental ethics. Prometheus, Amherst, NY, p 139

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J (2011) Natural law and natural rights. Oxford University Press, 2nd edn. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox W (1990) Toward a transpersonal ecology: developing new foundations for environmentalism. Shambhala Publications, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson N (1990) The right to a clean environment. Sask Law Rev 54:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosseries A (2008) On future generations’ future rights. J Polit Philos 16(4):446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle RK (1996–1997) Enforcing the elusive: environmental rights in east european constitutions. Va Environ Law J 16:633

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey W (1993) Anthropocentrism and deep ecology. Aust J Philos 71(4):463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gros Espiell H (1981) The right of development as a human right. Texas Int Law J 16:189

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (1955) Are there any natural rights? Philos Rev 64(2):175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (1982) Essays on Bentham: studies in jurisprudential and political theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward T (2005) Constitutional environmental rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiskes RP (2005) The right to a green future: human rights, environmentalism and intergenerational justice. Hum Rights Q 27(4):1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohfeld WN (1978) Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Greenwood Press, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (2002) (trans Wood A W) Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Yale University Press, New Haven. Translation of: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleingeld P, Brown E (2013) Cosmopolitanism. In: The stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/cosmopolitanism

  • Lee J (2000) The underlying legal theory to support a well-defined human right to a healthy environment as a principle of customary international law. Columbia J Environ Law 25:283

    Google Scholar 

  • Leib L (2011) Human rights and the environment: philosophical, theoretical and legal perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis B (2016) Quality control for new rights in international human rights law: a case study of the right to a good environment. Aust Yearb Int Law 33:55

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick DN (1997) Rights in legislation. In: Hacker PMS, Raz J (eds) Law, morality and society: essays in honour of HLA hart. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 154

    Google Scholar 

  • McClymonds JT (1992) The human right to a healthy environment: an international legal perspective. New York Law School Law Rev 37:583

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks S (2004) The human right to development: between rhetoric and reality. Harv Hum Rights J 17:137

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1976) Social justice. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller Okin S (1981) Liberty and welfare: some issues in human rights theory. In: Pennock JR, Chapman JW (eds) Human rights. New York University Press, New York, p 230

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess A (1995) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: a summary. In: Drengson A, Inoue Y (eds) The deep ecology movement: an introductory anthology. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge E (1990) On the rights of future generations. In: Scherer D (ed) Upstream/downstream: issues in environmental ethics. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge T (2000) The institutional significance of human rights. J Ethics 4:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1982) The idea of an overlapping consensus. Oxford J Legal Stud 7(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999) The laws of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1986) The morality of freedom, Clarendon

    Google Scholar 

  • Redgwell C (1996) Life, the universe and everything: a critique of anthropocentric rights. In: Boyle A, Anderson M (eds) Human rights approaches to environmental protection. Clarendon, Oxford, p 71

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich RY (1984) The right to development as an emerging human right. Va J Int Law 23:287

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Rivera LE (2001) Is the human right to environment recognised under international law? It depends on the source. Colo J Int Environ Law Policy 12:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton D (1985) A response to Donnelly and Alston. Calif West Law J 15:524

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton D (1991–1992) Human rights, environmental rights and the right to environment. Stanf J Int Law 28:103

    Google Scholar 

  • Symonides J (1992) The human right to a clean, balanced and protected environment. Int J Legal Inf 20:24

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke V (1982) Collective entities and moral rights: problems in liberal-democratic thought. J Polit 44(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbogaerde A (2013) The right to development in international human rights law: a call for its dissolution. Neth Q Hum Rights 31(2):187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenar L (2011) Rights. In: Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu.au/entries/rights/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bridget Lewis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lewis, B. (2018). The Theoretical Basis for Expanding Environmental Human Rights. In: Environmental Human Rights and Climate Change. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1960-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1960-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1959-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1960-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics