Skip to main content

Pitfall of Cyst Fluid Only

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thyroid FNA Cytology

Abstract

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) was developed to address terminology and other issues related to thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) [1, 2]. According to the system, recommended diagnostic categories are classified into six groups: “nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory (ND/UNS),” “benign,” “atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance,” “follicular neoplasm or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm,” “suspicious for malignancy,” and “malignant.” ND/UNS applies to specimens that are unsatisfactory owing to the following: (1) fewer than six groups of well-preserved, well-stained follicular cell groups with ten cells each; (2) poorly prepared, poorly stained, or obscured follicular cells; or (3) cyst fluid, with or without histiocytes, and fewer than six groups of ten benign follicular cells. Cystic papillary thyroid carcinoma cannot be excluded in the last “cyst fluid only (CFO)” scenario, resulting in these cases being classified as ND/UNS [1, 2]. In reporting system of Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery in 2015, however, CFO is handled differently from TBSRTC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ali S, Cibas E. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2018. p. 1–18.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2017;27:1341–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Japanese Society of Surgery. General rules for the description of thyroid cancer. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer. 2007;111:306–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Clark DP, et al. The National Cancer Institute Thyroid fine needle aspiration state of the science conference: a summation. Cytojournal. 2008;5:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MacDonald L, Yazdi HM. Nondiagnostic fine needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid gland: a diagnostic dilemma. Acta Cytol. 1996;40:423–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeoh GP, Chan KW. The diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of thyroid nodules: a retrospective 5-year analysis. Hong Kong Med J. 1999;5:140–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Renshaw AA. Accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration using receiver operator characteristic curves. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116:477–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jo VY, Stelow EB, Dustin SM, et al. Malignancy risk for fine-needle aspiration of thyroid lesions according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:450–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132:658–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takada N, Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, et al. Reappraisal of “cyst fluid only” on thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology. Endcr J. 2017;64:759–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arul P, Akshatha C, Masilamani S. A study of malignancy rates in different diagnostic categories of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: an institutional experience. Biom J. 2015;38:517–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. García-Pascual L, Barahona MJ, Balsells M, et al. Complex thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic fine needle aspiration cytology: histopathologic outcomes and comparison of the cytologic variants (cystic vs. acellular). Endocrine. 2011;39:33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi ED, et al. Thyroid FNA: International perspectives from the European Congress of cytopathology—Can we cross the bridge of classifications? Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123:207–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fadda G, Rossi ED. Italian and national systems for thyroid cytology. JBCM. 2015;4:46–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Takada, N., Hirokawa, M., Higuchi, M. (2019). Pitfall of Cyst Fluid Only. In: Kakudo, K. (eds) Thyroid FNA Cytology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1897-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1897-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1896-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1897-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics