Abstract
For patients with initially benign cytological results, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) clinical guidelines suggest ultrasound monitoring for more than 24 months for very-low-suspicion nodules, and 12–24 months for low-to-intermediate-suspicion nodules, and ultrasound monitoring and/or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy within 12 months for high-suspicion nodules [1]. Although accurate estimation of risk of malignancy (ROM) for cytological benign nodules is difficult because only a small fraction undergo surgery (causing selection bias and overestimation), it was estimated as 0-3% by the Bethesda system [2,3,4], as 1–2% in patients with systemic repeat FNA in nodules with prior benign cytology [5, 6], and as 3.2% of 4055 patients with benign cytology who underwent surgery [7]. However, higher ROMs have been reported in several other studies with meta-analyses: 3.7% by Bongiovanni et al., 4–9% by Sheffield et al., and 9.0 (1.1–32.2) % by Ohori and Schoedel [8,9,10]. Although false negatives in FNA diagnosis depend on multiple factors, such as sampling technique, nature of the nodule (fibrotic, calcified, cystic, or size of nodule), experience of interpreters, morphological criteria of FNA diagnoses, and method of handling incidental carcinomas, the author of this chapter believes it is of paramount importance to minimize false-negative results (ROMs for benign nodules) to the 0–3% level implied by the Bethesda system, which will establish trust between cytopathologists and clinical colleagues, as well as improve performance in thyroid FNA practice. For further analysis of false-positive diagnoses, please refer to Chap. 2, and for cytology laboratory quality control and how to monitor practice, please refer to Chap. 66.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–134.
Ali SZ, Cibas ES. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: definitions, criteria and explanatory notes. New York, NY: Springer; 2009.
Pusztaszeri M, Rossi ED, Auger M, et al. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: proposed modifications and updates for the second edition from an international panel. Acta Cytol. 2016;60:399–405.
Ali SZ, Cibas ES. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: definitions, criteria and explanatory notes. New York, NY: Springer; 2018.
Orlandi A, Puscar A, Capriata E, Fideleff H. Repeated fine-needle aspiration of the thyroid in benign nodular thyroid disease: critical evaluation of long-term follow-up. Thyroid. 2005;15:274–8.
Negro R, Attanasio R, Grimaldi F, et al. A 2016 Italian survey about guidelines and clinical management of thyroid nodules.—2016 update. European Thyroid J. 2017;6:75–81.
Tee YY, Lowe AJ, Brand CA, Judson RT. Fine needle aspiration may miss a third of all malignancy in palpable thyroid nodules: a comprehensive literature review. Ann Surg. 2007;246:714–20.
Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, et al. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Pathol. 2012;56:333–9.
Sheffield BS, Masoudi H, Walker B, Wiseman S. Preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2014;9:97–110.
Ohori NP, Schoedel KE. Variability in the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance diagnosis in the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: Sources and recommendations. Acta Cytol. 2011;55:492–8.
Japanese Thyroid Association Guidelines. Clinical practice for the management of thyroid nodules in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Nankodo Publishing Co; 2013. p. 1–277; (in Japanese).
Kakudo K, Kameyama K, Miyauchi A, et al. Introducing the reporting system for thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology according to the new guidelines of the Japan Thyroid Association. Endocr J. 2014;61:539–52.
Kakudo K, Kameyama K, Hirokawa M, et al. Subclassification of follicular neoplasms recommended by the Japan thyroid association reporting system of thyroid cytology. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:938305. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/938305.
Kakudo K, Higuchi M, Horokawa M, et al. Thyroid FNA cytology in Asian practice—active surveillance for indeterminate thyroid nodules reduces overtreatment of thyroid carcinomas. Cytopathology. 2017;28:455–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.12491.
Kakudo K. How to handle borderline/precursor thyroid tumors in management of patients with thyroid nodules. Gland Surg. 2017; https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.08.02.
Satoh S, Yamashita H, Kakudo K. Thyroid cytology: the Japanese system and experience at Yamashita Thyroid Hospital. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51:548–54.
Miyauchi A. Clinical trials of active surveillance of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg. 2016;40:516–22.
Ito Y, Uruno T, Nakano K, et al. An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid. 2003;13:381–7.
Ito Y, Miyauchi A. A therapeutic strategy for incidentally detected papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3:240–8.
Sugitani I, Toda K, Yamada K, et al. Three distinctly different kinds of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma should be recognized: our treatment strategies and outcomes. World J Surg. 2010;34:1222–31.
Brito JP, Ito Y, Miyauchi A, et al. A clinical framework to facilitate risk stratification when considering an active surveillance alternative to immediate biopsy and surgery in papillary microcarcinoma. Thyroid. 2016;26:144–9.
Choi YJ, Jung I, Min SJ, Kim HJ, J-h K, et al. Thyroid nodule with benign cytology: is clinical follow-up enough? PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63834. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063834.
Chernyavsky VS, Shanker B-A, Davidv T, et al. Is one benign fine needle aspiration enough? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1472–6.
Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract. 2016;22:622–39.
Medici M, Liu X, Kwong N, et al. Long-versus short-interval follow-up of cytologically benign thyroid nodules: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2016;14:11.
Nou E, Kwong N, Alexander LK, et al. Determination of the optimal time interval for repeat evaluation after a benign thyroid nodule aspiration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:510–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kakudo, K., Satoh, S., Okamoto, Y. (2019). How to Follow Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy-Confirmed Benign Thyroid Nodules. In: Kakudo, K. (eds) Thyroid FNA Cytology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1897-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1897-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1896-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1897-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)