Abstract
Although the demand for government assistance is rapidly increasing in Korea, it has become increasingly more difficult for the government to secure available financial resources. Amidst stagnant economic growth with considerable unemployment, the working age population in Korea is decreasing owing to the rapid process of fertility declines and population aging, while demand for social welfare and related government spending is increasing continuously. Considering that local governments account for 60% of total government spending in Korea, it is important to investigate the effects of government spending on economic growth from a regional perspective. In addition, as different types of government spending have different effects on output, the analysis should be conducted by distinguishing between the different components of government spending.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aschauer, D.A. 1989. Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics 23: 177–200.
Barro, R.J. 1990. Government spending in a simple model of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 98: 103–125.
Barro, R.J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. 1991. Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activities 22 (1): 107–182.
Barro, R.J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. 1995. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Baumol, W.J. 1986. Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: What the long run data show? American Economic Review 76: 1072–1085.
Brooks, C., and J. Manza. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bruckner, M., and A. Tuladhar. 2010. Public investment as a fiscal stimulus: Evidence from Japan’s regional spending during the 1990s. IMF Working Paper, No. 110.
Choe, B., and K. Lee. 2014. Local fiscal multiplier and its implication to the restructuring of local expenditure (in Korean). The Korean Journal of Local Finance 19 (2): 25–57.
Fleisher, B.M., Y. Hu, H. Li, and S. Kim. 2011. Economic transition, higher education and worker productivity in China. Journal of Development Economics 94: 86–94.
Garcia-Milà , T., T.J. McGuire, and R.H. Porter. 1996. The effect of public capital in state-level production functions reconsidered. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (1): 177–180.
Kim, S.S. 2009. The impacts of fiscal policy on economic growth: VAR approach (in Korean). The Journal of Korean Public Policy 11 (3): 255–280.
Lee, K., and B. Choe. 2015. Fiscal multiplier of local governments and the implication for local fiscal restructuring (in Korean). The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies 19 (2): 299–317.
Lichter, D.T., and R. Jayakody. 2002. Welfare reform: How do we measure success? Annual Review of Sociology 28: 117–141.
Lindbeck, A., P. Molander, T. Persson, O. Petersson, A. Sandmos, B. Swedenborg, and N. Thygesen. 1993. Options for economic and political reform in Sweden. Economic Policy 8 (17): 219–264.
Lucas, R.E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42.
Mankiw, N.G., D. Romer, and D. Weil. 1992. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 407–437.
McCallum, J., and A. Blais. 1987. Government, special interest groups, and economic growth. Public Choice 54: 3–18.
McDonald, B.D., and D.R. Miller. 2010. Welfare programs and the state economy. Journal of Policy Modeling 32: 719–732.
Moon, S., K. Lee, and B. Choe. 2015. Spatial spillovers of SOC in Korea: The implication for the local fiscal restructuring (in Korean). The Korea Spatial Planning Review 84: 55–73.
Oh, B.K. 2006. An evaluation of local public expenditure by using panel data in Korea (in Korean). The Korean Journal of Local Finance 11 (2): 5–31.
Oh, B.K. 2014. A dynamic panel analysis on local public investment expenditure with various regional economic variables at South Korea (in Korean). The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies 18 (3): 143–164.
Oketch, M.O. 2006. Determinants of human capital formation and economic growth of African countries. Economics of Education Review 25: 554–564.
Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. 1994. Is inequality harmful for growth? American Economic Review 84 (3): 600–621.
Roh, K.H., C.S. Jung, and S.T. Kim. 1995. Regional economic growth and local public finance in Korea: A dynamic causality analysis (in Korean). KyongJeHakYonGu 43 (2): 37–64.
Sala-i-Martin, X. 1996. The classical approach to convergence analysis. Economic Journal 106 (437): 1019–1036.
Teixeira, A.A.C., and N. Fortuna. 2004. Human capital, innovation capability and economic growth in Portugal, 1960–2001. Economic Journal 3: 205–225.
Wolfe, B.L. 2002. Incentives, challenges, and dilemmas of TANF: A case study. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (4): 577–586.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, KD., Moon, S., Choi, J. (2018). The Impacts of Public Spending by Function on Regional Economic Growth and Interregional Income Disparities: Evidence from Korea. In: Hosoe, M., Kim, I., Yabuta, M., Lee, W. (eds) Applied Analysis of Growth, Trade, and Public Policy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1876-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1876-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1875-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1876-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)