Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

  • 576 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter lays the theoretical and analytical foundations for this research. After the introduction about how cities and regions are currently understood both from the analytical perspective and policy agendas in spatial development, this chapter provides a review of the existing literature on spatial planning and governance at the urban and regional scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, C., & Dercon, S. (2009). The political economy of development: an assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 1149–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003). Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1985). Exports, policy choices, and economic growth in developing countries after the 1973 oil shock. Journal of Development Economics, 18(1), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterbury, S. P. J., & Fernando, J. L. (2006). Rescaling Governance and the Impacts of Political and Environmental Decentralization: An Introduction. World Development, 34(11), 1851–1863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglöf, E., & Thadden, V. (1999). The changing corporate governance paradigm: implications for transition and developing countries. Paper presented at the Conference Paper, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P. R., & French, S. P. (1994). The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan Quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13(4), 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. (Ed.). (1975). Economic Planning, East and West: Introduction. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J.-A., Hamel, P., Jouve, B., & Keil, R. (2006). Comparing metropolitan governance: the cases of Montreal and Toronto. Progress in Planning, 66, 7–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (2000). The political in the era of globalization and finance: Focus on some regulation school research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 274–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16, 459–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1999). Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 36(3), 431–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2002). Decoding the newest “metropolitan regionalism” in the USA: a critical overview. Cities, 19(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2003). Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary Western Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(4), 297–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2005). Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City, 9(1), 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britannica, E. (2012). Economic planning. Encyclopædia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/178458/economic-planning.

  • Brody, S. D. (2003). Are We Learning to Make Better Plans? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(2), 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, A. (2002). Foreword. In A. Faludi (Ed.), European spatial planning. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M., & Hare, P. (1981). Alternative approaches to economic planning. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (1997). The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies (Regional Development Studies 28). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. C. K., & Xian, S. (2012). Assessing the incentives in regional city-to-city cooperation: A case study of Jiangyin–Jingjiang Industrial Park of Jiangsu Province in the Yangtze River Delta region. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 53(1), 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. C. K., & Yao, S. (2010). New trends in urban and regional governance in the Pearl River Delta Region. Asian Geographer, 27(1–2), 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, S.-S. (2007). Institutional innovations, asymmetric decentralization, and local economic development: a case study of Kunshan, in post-Mao China. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, S.-S., & Gordon, I. (2008). Territorial Competition in China and the West. Regional Studies, 42(1), 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G. C. (2005). The Role of Planning in China’s Market Economy. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 3(3), 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranenburgh, O. v. (1998). Increasing State Capacity: What Role for the World Bank. IDS Bulletin, 29(2), 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deas, I., & Ward, K. G. (2000). From the ‘new localism’ to the ‘new regionalism’? The implications of regional development agencies for city–regional relations. Political Geography, 19(3), 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGaetano, A., & Strom, E. (2003). Comparative urban governance: an integrated approach. Urban Affairs Review, 38(3), 356–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, C. (2003). Land policy reform in China: assessment and prospects. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckett, J. (2001). Bureaucrats in Business, Chinese-Style: The Lessons of Market Reform and State Entrepreneurialism in the People’s Republic of China. World Development, 29(1), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, A. (2000). The Performance of Spatial Planning. Planning Practice & Research, 15(4), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/713691907.

  • Faludi, A. (2002). The European Spatial Development Perspective: An overview. In A. Faludi (Ed.), European Spatial Planning. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, A. (2009). A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ and the ‘First Action Programme’. Progress in Planning, 71(1), 1–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.001.

  • Faludi, A. (2010). European spatial planning: past, present and future. Town Planning Review, 21, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, A., & Waterhout, B. (2002). The making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No masterplan. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C. (2006). China’s Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2006–2010): from “getting rich first” to “common prosperity”. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47(6), 708–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., & Hong, H. (2012). Recent concerned issues of regional development in China and the interpretations of economic geography. Economic Geography, 32, 1–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., Sun, W., & Chen, D. (2009). Scientific and technological innovations in spatial planning during “the 11th Five-Year Plan” period and suggestions to the spatial planning of “the 12th Five-Year Plan”. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 24, 601–609 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., Sun, W., Yang, Z., Fan, P., & Chen, D. (2012). Focusing on the major function-oriented zone: A new spatial planning approach and practice in China and its 12th Five-Year Plan. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 53(1), 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiock, R. C. (2009). Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408324000.

  • Fisher, J. C. (1962). Planning the city of socialist man. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28, 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., & Alonso, W. (1964). Regional Development and Planning: Reader. Cambridge: Mit Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2004). Strategic spatial planning and the longer range. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(1), 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D., & Jonas, A. E. (2001). Rescaling and regional governance: the English Regional Development Agencies and the environment. Environment and Planning C, 19(2), 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubchikov, O. (2004). Urban planning in Russia: towards the market. European Planning Studies, 12(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000183950.

  • Goodwin, M., & Painter, J. (1996). Local governance, the crises of Fordism and the changing geographies of regulation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21(4), 635–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, C. (1992). The Chinese Urban System: History, Current Situation, Prospects. Beijing: Commercial Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., & Zonneveld, W. (2000). Spatial planning in the network society-rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 8(3), 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2009). Looking backward, looking forward: the city region of the mid-21st century. Regional Studies, 43(6), 803–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2010). Urban and regional planning (The Fourth ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. G., & Pain, K. (2006). The polycentric metropolis: learning from mega-city regions in Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. S. (2010). Urban expansion in contemporary China: What can we learn from a small town? Land Use Policy, 27, 780–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpham, T., & Boateng, K. A. (1997). Urban governance in relation to the operation of urban services in developing countries. Habitat International, 21(1), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 17, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (1997a). An institutionalist approach to spatial planning. In P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte & B. Needham (Eds.), Making strategic spatial plans: Innovation in Europe (pp. 21–36). London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (1997b). Planning Theory, Political Economy and the Interpretive Turn: The Debate Continues!: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006a). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006b). Traditions of planning thought. In P. Healey (Ed.), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (pp. 7–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006c). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies, 14(3), 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P., Cameron, S., Davoudi, S., Graham, S., & Madani-Pour, A. (1995). Introduction: the city-crisis, change and invention. In P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham & A. Madani-Pour (Eds.), Managing Cities: The New Urban Context (pp. 1–20). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrschel, T., & Newman, P. (2005). Global competition and city regional governance in Europe. In I. Sagan & H. Halkier (Eds.), Regionalism contested: Institutions, society and governance (pp. 203–322). Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1998). Socialism against markets? A critique of two recent proposals. Economy and Society, 27(4), 407–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Types of multi-level governance. European integration online papers (EIoP), 5(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A., Yan, Y., & Lu, J. (2010). From economic plan to development planning: transformation of China’s Five- year Plan (1953–2009). China Soft Science, 8, 14–25 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X. (2006). Evolution and prospect of China’s regional planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61(6), 585–594 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1995). The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: alternative perspectives on economic and political change? Economy and Society, 24(3), 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and meta-governance: on reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In H. P. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 101–116). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, A. E. G., & Ward, K. (2007). Introduction to a debate on city-regions: new geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2001). The rise of the regional state in economic governance: ‘partnerships for prosperity’ or new scales of state power? Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1185–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., & MacLeod, G. (2004). Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: territory, insurgent politics and the English question. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 433–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouve, B., & Lefèvre, C. (2002). Local Power, Territory and Institutions in European Metropolitan Regions (Vol. 9). London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, E. J., & Godschalk, D. R. (1995). Twentieth Century Land Use Planning: A Stalwart Family Tree. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, E. J., Godschalk, D. R. & Chapin, F. S. L. (1995). Urban Land Use Planning, Urbana, University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayden, J. S. (2000). National Land-Use Planning in America: Something Whose Time Has Never Come. Wash. UJL & Pol’y, 3, 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, A., & Paddison, R. (2000). New challenges for urban governance. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 845–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (1997). The invention of regions: political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15, 183–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M., & Loughlin, J. (1997). The political economy of regionalism (Vol. 1). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby, R., & Cannon, T. (1989). Introduction. In D. S. G. Goodman (Ed.), China’s Regional Development (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, L. (2000). Cultural policy in Singapore: negotiating economic and socio-cultural agendas. Geoforum, 31(4), 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, S., Huang, H., Chen, J., & Chen, X. (2013). From technical innovation to institutional innovation: Three-Plan-Coordination’ Practices in Heyuan, Yunfu and Guangzhou. Urban Planning Forum, 210(5), 63–69 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O. (1958). The Role of Planning in Socialist Economy. Indian Economic Review, 4(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1985). National economic planning: What is left? Washington, DC: Cato Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Galès, P. (1998). Regulations and governance in European cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(3), 482–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, M. (1998). Urban Planning and Urban Reality under Chinese Economic Reforms. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9801800206.

  • Li, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2011). The changing regional governance in China: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta. (Doctor of Philosophy), Cardiff University, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Wu, F. (2012). The transformation of regional governance in China: The rescaling of statehood. Progress in Planning, 78(2), 55–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Wu, F. (2013). The emergence of centrally initiated regional plan in China: A case study of Yangtze River Delta Regional Plan. Habitat International, 39(0), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Zhao, M., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Wu, W., Hu, W., & Zhang, B. (2011). Master plan: where to go? City Planning Review, 35(12), 28–34 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G. C. S. (2007). Reproducing spaces of Chinese urbanisation: new city-based and land-centred urban transformation. Urban Studies, 44(9), 1827–1855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y., & Liu, Z. (2000). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in China. Economic development and cultural change, 49(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., & Lu, D. (2005). Methodological basis for making regional spatial planning in China in the new era: a preliminary study based on planning of key economic regions in Developing Western China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60, 894–902 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, T., & Wang, M. (2010). The great leap forward type of regional planning in China. Financial Times in Chinese version. http://www.ftchinese.com/story/001033914/?print=y (in Chinese).

  • Luo, X. (2005). Inter-city Cooperation and Governance in the Yangtze River Delta Region. (Doctor of Philosophy), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. (2011). Inter-city Cooperation and Governance in the Yangtze River Delta Region. Beijing: The Commercial Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Shen, J. (2007). Urban governance in cross-border coalitions: the case of the Jiangyin Economic Development Zone in Jingjiang, China. International Development Planning Review, 29(3), 353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Shen, J. (2008). Why city-region planning does not work well in China: The case of Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou. Cities, 25(4), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Shen, J. (2009). A study on inter-city cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China. Habitat International, 33(1), 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. J. C. (2002). Urban transformation in China, 1949–2000: a review and research agenda. Environment and Planning A, 34(9), 1545–1569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. J. C. (2004). Economic reforms, urban spatial restructuring, and planning in China. Progress in Planning, 61(3), 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. J. C. (2005). Urban administrative restructuring, changing scale relations and local economic development in China. Political Geography, 24(4), 477–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, G. (2001). New regionalism reconsidered: globalization and the remaking of political economic space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(4), 804–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Scharpf, F. W., Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. (1996). Governance in the European Union. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meligrana, J., Ren, W., Zhang, Z., & Anderson, B. (2008). Planning a mega-city’s future: An evaluation of Shanghai’s municipal land-use plan. Town Planning Review, 79, 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • MRL. (2006). Annual Land Use Plan Method. Beijing: Retrieved from http://www.law-lib.com/law/law_view.asp?id=14356 (in Chinese).

  • Nadin, V. (2007). The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Planning Practice & Research, 22(1), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. (2005). The New Common Economic Program: China’s Eleventh Five Year Plan and What It Means. China Leadership Monitor, No. 16 (No. 16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedović-Budić, Z. (2001). Adjustment of planning practice to the new Eastern and Central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedović-Budić, Z., & Cavrić, B. (2006). Waves of planning: a framework for studying the evolution of planning systems and empirical insights from Serbia and Montenegro. Planning Perspectives, 21(4), 393–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, M. K., & Tang, W. S. (1999). Urban system planning in China: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. Urban Geography, 20(7), 591–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, M. K., & Tang, W. S. (2004a). The Role of Planning in the Development of Shenzhen, China: Rhetoric and Realities. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 45(3), 190–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, M. K., & Tang, W. S. (2004b). Theorizing urban planning in a transitional economy: The case of Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China. Town Planning Review, 75(2), 173–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, M. K., & Xu, J. (2000). Development control in post-reform China: the case of Liuhua Lake Park, Guangzhou. Cities, 17(6), 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu, H. (2004). National planning, regional planning and urban planning: how to coordinate them in China. City Planning Review, 28(11), 42–44 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. F. (2001). Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: Economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), 557–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, J. C. (1995). The Role of the Local State in China’s Transitional Economy. The China Quarterly, 144, 1132–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, K. (2008). Examining ‘core–periphery’ relationships in a global city-region: the case of London and South East England. Regional Studies, 42(8), 1161–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. (2005). Perspectives on the city-region. Regional Studies, 39(5), 555–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. B. (1999). Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning: A retrospective view part 1. origins and advocacy. Urban Studies, 36(7), 1195–1215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2001). Neoliberalizing states: thin policies/hard outcomes. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J., & Smith, A. (1998). Theorizing Transition: Political Economy of Post-communist Transformations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance the institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 372–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2005). Comparative Urban Governance Uncovering Complex Causalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(4), 446–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., & Peters, G. B. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. In G. B. Peters, J. Pierre & G. Stoker (Eds.), Governance, Politics and the State: Macmillan Publishers Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, H., & Wong, C. (2012). Master Planning under Urban–Rural Integration: The Case of Nanjing, China. Urban Policy and Research, 30, 403–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, B. (2005). Hybrid Planning Cultures: The Search for the Global Cultural Commons. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitch, H. V., & Vogel, R. K. (2009). Theories of urban politics. In J. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of Urban Politics (Second ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1998). Regions and the world economy: the coming shape of global production, competition, and political order. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., Agnew, J., Soja, E. W., & Storper, M. (2001). An overview. In A. J. Scott (Ed.), Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy (pp. 11–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. (2004). Urban competitiveness and urban governance in the globalizing world. Asian Geographer, 23(1–2), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. (2007). Scale, state and the city: urban transformation in post-reform China. Habitat International, 31, 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1985). Regions in Context: spatiality, periodicity, and the historical geography of the regional question. Environment and Planning D, 3, 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2009). Regional Planning and Development Theories. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 259–270). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S. (2006). The unbearable burden of urban planning in China: The impairment of the pursuit of efficiency on urban planning. Urban Planning Forum, 161(1), 11–17 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (Vol. 137, pp. 138–166). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, W. S. (2000). Chinese urban planning at fifty: An assessment of the planning theory literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 14(3), 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitz, M. B. (1996). American planning in the 1990s: Evolution, debate and challenge. Urban Studies, 33(4–5), 649–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L. (2013). Land urbanization of china at the cross road: a review on the evolution since the establishment of land use right system and the prospect of its transformation. City Planning Review, 37(5), 22–28 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L., & Ma, W. (2009). Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply. Land Use Policy, 26(3), 599–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickell, A., & Peck, J. A. (1995). Social regulation after Fordism: regulation theory, neo-liberalism and the global-local nexus. Economy and Society, 24(3), 357–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • TomÀS, M. (2012). Exploring the metropolitan trap: The case of Montreal. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 554–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigar, G., Healey, P., Hull, A., & Davoudi, S. (2000). Planning, Governance and Spatial Strategy in Britain: an institutionalist analysis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, R. K., Savitch, H. V., Xu, J., Yeh, A. G. O., Wu, W., Sancton, A., . . . Zhang, F. (2011). Governing global city regions in China and the West. Progress in Planning, 73(1), 1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. G. (1995). Local Governments as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China’s Transitional Economy. American Journal of Sociology, 101(2), 263–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Tang, M. (2005). The “Three Kingdoms” of during the plan-making. Outlook Weekly (45), 22–26 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Shen, J. (2013). The changing spatial planning in the system of five-year plan/planning in China. Progress in Geography, 32(8), 1195–1206 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Shen, J. (2014). The Changing Relations Among the Socio-economic Five-Year Planning, Urban-Rural Planning and Land Use Planning in China. Urban Planning Forum, 216(3), 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2004). On regional planning: some inspiration from the experience of New Jersey in America. City Planning Review, 28(4), 65–69 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2009). Institutional reasons of conflicts between master plan and land use plan: causes of land expropriation of local government. City Planning Review, 33(10), 53–59 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. P., & Hague, C. (1993). Territory planning in China: A new regional approach. Regional Studies, 27(6), 561–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. D. (2002). Beyond the Sunan model: trajectory and underlying factors of development in Kunshan, China. Environment and Planning A, 34(10), 1725–1747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. H. D. (2010). Beyond new regionalism, beyond global production networks: remaking the Sunan model, China. Environment and Planning C: 28, 72–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. Third world quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. H. (1996). European Union spatial policy and planning. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. (2004). Toward a contingent urban neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 25(8), 771–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. (2002). Is there a need for a fully integrated spatial planning framework for the United Kingdom? Planning Theory & Practice, 3(3), 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C., Qian, H., & Zhou, K. (2008). In search of regional planning in China: The case of Jiangsu and the Yangtze Delta. Town Planning Review, 79(2–3), 295–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C., & Watkins, C. (2009). Conceptualising spatial planning outcomes: towards an integrative measurement framework. Town Planning Review, 80(4), 481–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1992). Governance and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2002). China’s changing urban governance in the transition towards a more market-oriented economy. Urban Studies, 39(7), 1071–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2003). The (post-) socialist entrepreneurial city as a state project: Shanghai’s reglobalisation in question. Urban Studies, 40(9), 1673–1698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2007). Re-orientation of the city plan: Strategic planning and design competition in China. Geoforum, 38(2), 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Xu, J., & Yeh, A. G. O. (2007). Urban Development in Post-Reform China: State, Market, and Space. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., & Zhang, F. (2008). Planning the Chinese city: Governance and development in the midst of transition. Town Planning Review, 79(2), 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., & Zhang, J. (2007). Planning the competitive city-region: the emergence of strategic development plan in China. Urban Affairs Review, 42(5), 714–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., & Zhang, F. (2010). China’s emerging city region governance: Towards a research framework. Progress in Planning, 73(1), 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. (2006). Regional Planning in Contemporary China. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2008). Governing city-regions in China: Theoretical issues and perspectives for regional strategic planning Town Planning Review, 79, 157–186 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Ng, M. K. (1998). Socialist urban planning in transition: the case of Guangzhou, China. Third World Planning Review, 20(1), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Wang, J. J. (2012). Reassembling the state in urban China. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 53, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Yeh, A. (2009). Decoding urban land governance: state reconstruction in contemporary Chinese cities. Urban Studies, 46(3), 559–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Yeh, A. G. O. (2005). City repositioning and competitiveness building in regional development: new development strategies in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(2), 283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Yeh, A. G. O. (2012). Re-building regulation and re-inventing Governance in the Pearl River Delta, China. Urban Policy and Research, 30(4), 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., & Hu, A. (2012). A post-evaluation for China’s eleven Five Year Plans. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy social science edition), 4, 35–45 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. (2005). Multilevel governance in the cross-boundary region of Hong Kong - Pearl River Delta, China. Environment and Planning A, 37, 2147–2168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., & Li, S.-m. (2013). Transformation of cross-boundary governance in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China: Contested geopolitics and emerging conflicts. Habitat International, 40(0), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, L. (2014). State-led metropolitan governance in China: Making integrated city regions. Cities, 41, 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, A. G., & Wu, F. (1999). The transformation of the urban planning system in China from a centrally-planned to transitional economy. Progress in Planning, 51(3), 167–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, A. G. O., & Xu, J. (2008). Regional cooperation in the Pan-Pearl River Delta: a formulaic aspiration or a new imagination? Built Environment, 34(4), 408–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yep, R. (2000). The Limitations of Corporatism for Understanding Reforming China: An empirical analysis in a rural county. Journal of Contemporary China, 9, 547–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T.-s. (1995). The role of government in economic planning and development: the case of the ROC on Taiwan. In C.-H. I. f. E. Research (Ed.), Occasional Paper Series No.9503 (pp. 1–17). Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X., & Wu, C. (1993). Study on Territorial and Regional Planning in Yangtze River Delta Region: Theory, Method and Practice. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2013). Scale rescaling of regional governance: based on the analysis of the perspective of “national strategic regional planning”. Urban Development Research, 20(5), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Geng, L., Yin, J., & Luo, X. (2011). The regional cooperative governance from the perspective of regional spatial production: a case of study of Jinjiang Park, Jiangyin Economic Development Zone. Human Geography, 117, 5–10 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Wu, F. (2006). China’s changing economic governance: administrative annexation and the reorganization of local governments in the Yangtze River Delta. Regional Studies, 40(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Wu, F., & Ma, R. (2008). Institutional transition and reconstruction of China’s urban space: establishing an institutional analysis structure for spatial evolution. City Planning Review, 32(6), 55–60 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. (1999). Why the urban system plan cannot be implemented well. Planner, 15(3), 31–32 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T. (2000). Land market forces and government’s role in sprawl: The case of China. Cities, 17(2), 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T. (2002a). Challenges Facing Chinese Planners in Transitional China. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(1), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T. (2002b). Urban development and a socialist pro-growth coalition in Shanghai. Urban Affairs Review, 37(4), 475–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., & Richard, L. (2009). Changing planning paradigm in China in the post Neo-liberalism era Urban Planning Forum, 5, 1–13 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. (2010). The China Model: can it replace the Western model of modernization? Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. B., & Zhang, L. (1999). Decentralization reforms and regionalism in China: a review. International Regional Science Review, 22(3), 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Feng, X., & Zhao, Y. (2004). Local governments’ competition and reconstruction of market order. Social Sciences in China (1), 56–66 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (1999). Local growth coalition: The context and implications of China’s gradualist urban land reforms. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(3), 534–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2004). Local developmental state and order in China’s urban development during transition. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2), 424–447.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Science Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, L. (2019). Spatial Planning and Governance: Literature Review. In: Changing Spatial Elements in Chinese Socio-economic Five-year Plan: from Project Layout to Spatial Planning. Springer Geography. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1867-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics