Advertisement

Discussion and Conclusion

Chapter
  • 529 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

Collaboration is a twenty-first century skill across professions and disciplines. There is a clear need for collaboration in education to enable quality and coherence in the design and implementation of programs (Norton, Sonnemann & Cherastidtham, 2013; Jones, Lefoe, Harvey & Ryland, 2012; Zundans-Fraser, 2014). The commentary claims and empirical research in this literature review addressed the challenge and supported the need to identify and study the components or phenomena of effective collaboration and their interactions.

References

  1. Bain, A., Lancaster, J., & Zundans, L. (2009). Pattern language development in the preparation of inclusive educators. International Journal of the Teacher and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 336–349 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. EJ869320).Google Scholar
  2. Blue-Banning, M., Summers, J. A., Frankland, C., Lord Nelson, J., & Beegle, G. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 167–184 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. EJ695925).Google Scholar
  3. Briggs, C. L. (2007). Curriculum collaborations: A key to continuous program renewal. The Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 679–711. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4501239?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  4. Carter, N., Prater, M.A., Jackson, A., & Marchant, M. (2009). Educators’ perceptions of collaborative planning processes for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 54(1), 60–70 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. EJ845958).Google Scholar
  5. Ciampaglia, B. I. (2010). Analysis of school-wide supports and barriers to CPS teams: Fidelity in applying the process. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts, May 2010. UMI Number: 3409557.Google Scholar
  6. Czajkowski, J. M. (2006). Success factors in higher education collaborations: A collaboration success measurement model. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, Capella University, June 2006. UMI Number: 3226184, ProQuest Information and Learning Company.Google Scholar
  7. Dettmer, P., Thurston, L. P. & Dyck, N. (2005). Foundations and frameworks for collaborative school consultation. In Consultation, collaboration and teamwork for students with special needs, 5/E (5th ed., pp. 35–66). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  8. Doppenberg, J. J., den Brok, P. J., & Bakx, A. (2012). Collaborative teacher learning across foci of collaboration: Perceived activities and outcomes WEA Netherlands. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 899–910.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.709731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fransen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27(2011), 1103–1113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2014). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  11. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M., & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 34(1), 67–78.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2012.642334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kezar, A. (2001). Documenting the landscape: Results of a national study on academic and student affairs collaborations. New Directions for Higher Education, 116(Winter), 39–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/he.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kezar, A. J., & Lester, J. (2009). Organizing higher education for collaboration: A guide for campus leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Kovaleski, J. F., & Glew, M. C. (2006). Bringing instructional support teams to scale: Implications of the Pennsylvania experience. Remedial and Special Education, 27(1), 16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270010301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teacher’s collaborative activities facilitate and constrain learning. Teacher and Teacher Education, 26(2010), 389–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lofthouse, R., & Thomas, U. (2017). Concerning collaboration: Teachers’ perspectives on working in partnerships to develop teaching practices. Professional Development in Education, 43(1), 36–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1053570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Magolda, P. (2001). Border crossings: Collaboration struggles in education. Journal of Educational Research, 49(6), 346–358.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670109598772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.481256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Norton, A., Sonnemann, J., & Cherastidtham, I. (2013). Taking university teaching seriously. Grattan Institute. Retrieved from http://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/191_Taking-Teaching-Seriously.pdf.
  21. Nokes-Malach, T. J., Meade, M. L., & Morrow, D. G. (2012). The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 18(1), 32–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2011.642206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 collaborative problem-solving framework. In PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving (pp. 131–188). Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-8-en.
  23. Rafoth, M. A., & Foriska, T. (2006). Administrator participation in promoting effective problem-solving teams. Remedial and Special Education, 27(3), 130–135.  https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270030101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Fiore, S. M., Pavlas, D., & Lum, H. C. (2009). Team cognition and external representations: A framework and propositions for supporting collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53, 1295–1299.  https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120905301828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salisbury, C. L., Evans, I. M., & Palombaro, M. M. (1997). Collaborative problem-solving to promote the inclusion of children with significant disabilities in primary grades. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 195–209.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299706300204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Santangelo, T. (2009). Collaborative problem solving effectively implemented, but not sustained: A case for aligning the sun, the moon and the stars. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 185–209.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shroyer, G., Yahnke, S., Bennett, A., & Dunn, C. (2007). Simultaneous renewal though professional development school partnerships. Journal of Educational Research, 100(4), 211–224.  https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.100.4.211-225.
  28. Stephens, C. S. & Myers, E. (2000). Process Constraints: Testing the Perceived Impact on Product Quality and the Effectiveness of Team Interactions. Paper presented at the International Academy for Information Management 15th Annual Conference, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 158–169 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. ED473389).Google Scholar
  29. Stoyanova, N., & Kommers, P. (2002). Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(1/2), 111–133. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/10783/.
  30. Taggar, S., & Ellis, R. (2007). The role of leaders in shaping formal team norms. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2007), 105–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., et al. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2011), 1235–1244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weiss, M. P., Pellegrino, A., Regan, K., & Mann, L. (2015). Beyond the blind date: Collaborative course development and co-teaching by teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(2), 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Winitzky, N., Sheridan, S., Crow, N., Welch, M., & Kennedy, C. (1995). Interdisciplinary collaboration: Variations on a theme. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 109–119.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487195046002005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Towards a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Behavioural Science, 27(2), 139–162.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zundans-Fraser, L. A. (2014). Self-organisation in course design: A collaborative, theory-based approach to course development in inclusive education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations