Team-Based Structures, Protocols and Problem-Solving Skills for Effective Collaboration

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)


This chapter examines commentary claims and empirical research on the role of team-based structures in effective collaboration, such as meeting and problem-solving protocols. Here we are focussing on methods of interaction that support collaboration, and the benefits and challenges of implementing them with integrity. Given the lack of models in HE (Norton, Sonnemann, & Cherastidtham, 2013), the literature in this chapter is predominantly school-based.


  1. Ciampaglia, B. I. (2010). Analysis of school-wide supports and barriers to CPS teams: Fidelity in applying the process. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts, May 2010. UMI Number: 3409557.Google Scholar
  2. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2014). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  3. Hobbs, T., & Westling, D. L. (1998). Promoting successful inclusion through collaborative problem-solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(1), 12–19. Scholar
  4. Kezar, A. (2006). Redesigning for collaboration in learning initiatives: An examination of four highly collaborative initiatives. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 805–838 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. EJ753235).Google Scholar
  5. Kovaleski, J. F., & Glew, M. C. (2006). Bringing instructional support teams to scale: Implications of the Pennsylvania experience. Remedial and Special Education, 27(1), 16–25. Scholar
  6. Norton, A., Sonnemann, J., & Cherastidtham, I. (2013). Taking university teaching seriously, Grattan Institute. Retrieved from
  7. Olson, L. M. (2003). Pathways to collaboration. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 11(4), 236–239. Retrieved from
  8. Salisbury, C. L., Evans, I. M., & Palombaro, M. M. (1997). Collaborative problem-solving to promote the inclusion of children with significant disabilities in primary grades. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 195–209. Scholar
  9. Stephens, C. S., & Myers, E. (2000). Process constraints: Testing the perceived impact on product quality and the effectiveness of team interactions. Paper presented at the International Academy for Information Management 15th Annual Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 158–169 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. ED473389).Google Scholar
  10. Winitzky, N., Sheridan, S., Crow, N., Welch, M., & Kennedy, C. (1995). Interdisciplinary collaboration: Variations on a theme. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 109–119. Scholar
  11. Zundans-Fraser, L. A. (2014). Self-organisation in course design: A collaborative, theory-based approach to course development in inclusive education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations