Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)


To be better learning organisations, universities need to capture the benefits of collaboration. This chapter establishes both the need for collaboration in higher education and the gaps between aspirations and current practice. The literature review method is explained along with the way the review will address key issues and questions related to the role of collaboration in higher education settings.


Literature Review Method Grattan Report Term Collaboration Collaborative Teaching Practice Higher Educ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bain, A. (2007). The self-organising school: Next-generation comprehensive school reforms. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  2. Bain, A., Walker, A., & Chan, A. (2011). Self-organisation and capacity building: Sustaining the change. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 701–719. Scholar
  3. Bain, A., & Zundans-Fraser, Z. (2017). The self-organising university: Designing the higher education organization for quality learning and teaching. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley, T., & Cazaly, C. (2015). The shared work of learning: Lifting educational achievement through collaboration. Mitchell Institute research report no. 03/2015. Mitchell Institute for Health and Education Policy and the Centre for Strategic Education, Melbourne. Retrieved from
  5. Blue–Banning, M., Summers, J. A., Frankland, C., Lord Nelson, J., & Beegle, G. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 167–184 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. EJ695925).Google Scholar
  6. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Retrieved from
  7. Briggs, C. L. (2007). Curriculum collaborations: A key to continuous program renewal. The Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 679–711. Retrieved from
  8. Burrell, A. R., Cavanagh, M., Young, S., & Carter, H. (2015). Team-based curriculum design as an agent of change. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(8), 753–766. Scholar
  9. Chapman, C., & Fullan, M. (2007). Collaborative partnerships for equitable improvement: Towards a networked learning system. Editorial. School Leadership and Management, 27(3), 207–211. Scholar
  10. Dettmer, P., Thurston, L. P., & Dyck, N. (2005). Foundations and frameworks for collaborative school consultation. In Consultation, collaboration and teamwork for students with special needs, 5/E (5th ed., pp. 35–66). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  11. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2014). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  12. Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform. Centre for Strategic Education, Seminar Series paper 204, April 2011, 1–19. East Melbourne, VIC: CSE. Retrieved from
  13. Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in Public Elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. EJ820449).Google Scholar
  15. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis of achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91. Scholar
  17. Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49, 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoban, G. (Ed.). (2005). The missing links in teacher education design: Developing a multi-linked conceptual framework. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer/Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M., & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed leadership: a collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 34(1), 67–78. Scholar
  20. Jorgensen, C. M., McSheehan, M., & Sonnenmeier, R. M. (2009). Essential best practices in inclusive schools. SEPAC. Retrieved from
  21. Kezar, A., & Holcombe, E. (2018). Mental models and implementing new faculty roles. Innovative Higher Education, 43(2), 91-106.
  22. Kezar, A. J., & Lester, J. (2009). Organizing higher education for collaboration: A guide for campus leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Lawson, H. A. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 225–237. Scholar
  24. Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teacher’s collaborative activities facilitate and constrain learning. Teacher and Teacher Education, 26(2010), 389–398. Scholar
  25. Magolda, P. (2001). Border crossings: Collaboration struggles in education. Journal of Educational Research, 49(6), 346–358. Scholar
  26. Meiers, M. & Ingvarson, L. (2005). Investigating the links between teacher professional development and student learning outcomes. Australian Government Quality Teacher Programme. ACER Australian Council for Educational Research, 1, 1–93. Retrieved from
  27. NCATE. (2014). Program Standards. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. Retrieved from
  28. Norton, A., Sonnemann, J., & Cherastidtham, I. (2013). Taking university teaching seriously, Grattan Institute. Retrieved from
  29. OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 collaborative problem-solving framework. In PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving (pp. 131–188). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  30. Oliver, S. L., & Hyun, E. (2011). Comprehensive curriculum reform in higher education: Collaborative engagement of faculty and educators. Journal of Case Studies in Education, 2, 1–20 (ERIC Document reproduction Service No. EJ1057195).Google Scholar
  31. Olson, L. M. (2003). Pathways to collaboration. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 11(4), 236–239. Retrieved from
  32. QAA. (2015). The Quality Code: A brief guide. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved from
  33. Schleicher, A. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. OECD International summit on the teaching profession, New York, NY: OECD Publishing—Education at a glance 2010. Retrieved from
  34. Shannon, G. S., & Bylsma, P. (2007). Nine characteristics of high-performing schools: A research based resource for schools and districts to assist with improving student learning (2nd ed., pp. 1–23). Olympia, WA: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Retrieved from
  35. Shroyer, G., Yahnke, S., Bennett, A., & Dunn, C. (2007). Simultaneous renewal though professional development school partnerships. Journal of Educational Research, 100(4), 211–224. Scholar
  36. Smethurst, J. B. (1997). Of practice and pattern language. Journal of Transition Management. Retrieved from
  37. TEQSA. (2015). Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015. Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011. Retrieved from
  38. Thies, L. C. (2016). Building staff capacity through reflecting on collaborative development of embedded academic literacies curricula. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(5). Retrieved from
  39. Winitzky, N., Sheridan, S., Crow, N., Welch, M., & Kennedy, C. (1995). Interdisciplinary collaboration: Variations on a theme. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 109–119. Scholar
  40. Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Towards a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Behavioural Science, 27(2), 139–162. Scholar
  41. Zundans-Fraser, L. A. (2014). Self-organisation in course design: A collaborative, theory-based approach to course development in inclusive education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  42. Zundans-Fraser, L., & Bain, A. (2016). Rising to the challenge of transforming higher education. Singapore. Retrieved from ProQuest Ebook Central: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations