Skip to main content

Impact of Disruptive Technology on Juvenile Disruptive Behavior in Classroom

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computing and Data Sciences (ICACDS 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 906))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 889 Accesses

Abstract

Bestowing to Christensen [1] (https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Clayton+M.+Christensen&item_type), Disruptive Technology (DT) as an evolving technology which relocates the existing technology. Mobile computing, smart phones, cloud computing, social networking are some of the disruptive technologies that displaces conventional technologies. In near future the technology might transform the life style and there are 12 Disruptive Technologies (DT’s) that are identified [2] (https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/overview). Disruptive behaviour among juvenile in India, particularly in Bangalore (Karnataka) has become a great encounter for both parents and teachers. This study, first and foremost in this field of DT and intends to explore critically the influence of disruptive technology and disruptive behaviour among the school children. With the help of independent variables, such as demographic. Sociocultural, economic, political, environmental, infrastructural, and in addition the disruptive technological factors that are influencing the disruptive behaviour among school children are tested. The big five dimensions of personality, often referred to as “Big 5” personality traits J.M. Digman [3] (extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism) adopted to test the personality of the child. Primary data are to be used through a rigorous drop-off survey. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach is exploited to generate the results with the help of software IBM SPSS AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structures). Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) has been deployed to evaluate the original and modification indices of the model, which further establishes the improvement in SEM’s effectiveness. The model establishes the significant impact of Disruptive Technology on class room behaviour. The targeted sample is 2000, includes high school children from 8th to 10th standard (both private and public), family members and teachers, and the response was 1679. Recommendation and policy implications are henceforth provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://books.google.co.in/books?isbn=0080516661.

  2. 2.

    https://euacademic.org/UploadArticle/1247.pdf.

  3. 3.

    https://indiankanoon.org/doc/161538964/.

  4. 4.

    journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184913411184.

  5. 5.

    https://indiankanoon.org/doc/814655/.

  6. 6.

    https://spst.up.nic.in/28-09-2017.pdf.

References

  1. King, A.A., Baatartogtokh, B.: Strategy, innovation, innovation strategy, developing strategy. How useful is the theory of disruptive innovation? (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI): Global go to think tank index report published on January 31, 2018 by the Think Tank and Civil Society Program at the Lauder Institute, University of Pennsylvania (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tupes, E.C., Christal, R.E.: Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Technical report ASD-TR-61-97, Personnel Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, Lackland Air Force Base, TX (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Digman, J.M.: Personality structure: emergence of the five-factormodel. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41, 417–440 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burgelman, R.A., Maidique, M.A., Wheelwright, S.C.: Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gebrezgabher, et al.: Evaluation of new farming technologies in Ethiopia using the Integrated Decision Support System (IDSS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corrigan, P.W., Larson, J.E., Ruesch, N.: Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry 8(2), 75–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tobler, M., et al.: An indigenous religious ritual selects for resistance to a toxicant in a level bearing fish (2011). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236625781_Tobler_et_al_2011_Indigenous_ritural

  9. Judge, G.G., Hill, R.C., Griffiths, W. E., Lutkepohl, H., Lee, T.-C.: Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1988). TIME Magazine Cover: The ME MEME Generation

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hirschi’s 1969, Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Social Science (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siddiqui, M.M.: On the inversion of the sample covariance matrix in a stationary autoregressive process. Ann. Math. Stat. (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khattri, P.K.: An optimized technique for determining stacking velocity from seismic reflection data, 1980 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1980.tb01263.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shanmugam, T.E.: Psychological Factors Underlying Juvenile Delinquency. Madras University, Madras (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pareek, U.: Reliability of the Indian adaptation of Rosenzweig P-F study (children’s form). J. Psychol. Res. 2, 18–23 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pareek, U.: Some preliminary data about the Indian adaptation of Resenzweg P-F study (children’s form). Educ. Psychol. 5, 105–113 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pareek, U.: Studying cultural differences in personality development with the help of Rosenzweig P-F study (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parwal, S.: Development of EHV Cables. Institute of Electrical Engineers, Mumbai (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Copel, S.L.: Behaviour Pathology of Childhood and Adolescence. Basic Books Inc., New York (Bhatt, D.B. 1990) (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malhotra, M.M., Menon, P.N.: Reviewing learner evaluation in india: an inside story (After Independence - 2000). European Academic Research, vol. II, Issue 10/January 2015 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma, R., Mishra, M., Gupta, B., Parsania, C., Singla-Pareek, S.L., Pareek, A.: De novo assembly and characterization of stress transcriptome in a salinity-tolerant variety CS52 of Brassica juncea. PLoS ONE, e0126783 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126783

  21. Dhondhyal, S.: Personality study of victimised aggressors among children. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Ch. Charan Singh University, Meerut (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/161538964/

  23. TeacherEmpowerment, The Education Entitlement–Social Transformation Traverse, Poonam Batra, First Published January 1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. JUDGMENT Manmohan Sarin, J Page 3817, Sushil Kumar Rajput vs Director Of Education And Ors. on 24 November, 2006, Equivalent citations: 139 DLT 104 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. http://www.spst.up.nic.in/28-09-2017.pdf

  26. Ilgin, M.A., Gupta, S.M.: Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. J. Environ. Manag. 91(3), 563–591 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yadawa, P.K.: Computational study of ultrasonic parameters of HCP transition metals Fe, Co and Ni. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37, 255–262 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pravin-Chandra, K.R.: Occupational and environmental health: an integral part of community health. RGUHS J. Med. Sci. 12(4), 34–38 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C.: Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Prentice Hall (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M.: Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle, R. (Ed.): Structural equation modeling: issues, concepts, and applications, pp. 76–99. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Daire, et al.: Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit, p. 2. (2008). Articles

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vani Ramesh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ramesh, V. (2018). Impact of Disruptive Technology on Juvenile Disruptive Behavior in Classroom. In: Singh, M., Gupta, P., Tyagi, V., Flusser, J., Ören, T. (eds) Advances in Computing and Data Sciences. ICACDS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 906. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1813-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1813-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1812-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1813-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics