Abstract
Bestowing to Christensen [1] (https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Clayton+M.+Christensen&item_type), Disruptive Technology (DT) as an evolving technology which relocates the existing technology. Mobile computing, smart phones, cloud computing, social networking are some of the disruptive technologies that displaces conventional technologies. In near future the technology might transform the life style and there are 12 Disruptive Technologies (DT’s) that are identified [2] (https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/overview). Disruptive behaviour among juvenile in India, particularly in Bangalore (Karnataka) has become a great encounter for both parents and teachers. This study, first and foremost in this field of DT and intends to explore critically the influence of disruptive technology and disruptive behaviour among the school children. With the help of independent variables, such as demographic. Sociocultural, economic, political, environmental, infrastructural, and in addition the disruptive technological factors that are influencing the disruptive behaviour among school children are tested. The big five dimensions of personality, often referred to as “Big 5” personality traits J.M. Digman [3] (extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism) adopted to test the personality of the child. Primary data are to be used through a rigorous drop-off survey. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach is exploited to generate the results with the help of software IBM SPSS AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structures). Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) has been deployed to evaluate the original and modification indices of the model, which further establishes the improvement in SEM’s effectiveness. The model establishes the significant impact of Disruptive Technology on class room behaviour. The targeted sample is 2000, includes high school children from 8th to 10th standard (both private and public), family members and teachers, and the response was 1679. Recommendation and policy implications are henceforth provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
King, A.A., Baatartogtokh, B.: Strategy, innovation, innovation strategy, developing strategy. How useful is the theory of disruptive innovation? (2015)
The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI): Global go to think tank index report published on January 31, 2018 by the Think Tank and Civil Society Program at the Lauder Institute, University of Pennsylvania (2017)
Tupes, E.C., Christal, R.E.: Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Technical report ASD-TR-61-97, Personnel Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, Lackland Air Force Base, TX (1961)
Digman, J.M.: Personality structure: emergence of the five-factormodel. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41, 417–440 (1990)
Burgelman, R.A., Maidique, M.A., Wheelwright, S.C.: Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)
Gebrezgabher, et al.: Evaluation of new farming technologies in Ethiopia using the Integrated Decision Support System (IDSS) (2017)
Corrigan, P.W., Larson, J.E., Ruesch, N.: Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry 8(2), 75–81 (2009)
Tobler, M., et al.: An indigenous religious ritual selects for resistance to a toxicant in a level bearing fish (2011). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236625781_Tobler_et_al_2011_Indigenous_ritural
Judge, G.G., Hill, R.C., Griffiths, W. E., Lutkepohl, H., Lee, T.-C.: Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1988). TIME Magazine Cover: The ME MEME Generation
Hirschi’s 1969, Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Social Science (1969)
Siddiqui, M.M.: On the inversion of the sample covariance matrix in a stationary autoregressive process. Ann. Math. Stat. (1976)
Khattri, P.K.: An optimized technique for determining stacking velocity from seismic reflection data, 1980 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1980.tb01263.x
Shanmugam, T.E.: Psychological Factors Underlying Juvenile Delinquency. Madras University, Madras (1980)
Pareek, U.: Reliability of the Indian adaptation of Rosenzweig P-F study (children’s form). J. Psychol. Res. 2, 18–23 (1958)
Pareek, U.: Some preliminary data about the Indian adaptation of Resenzweg P-F study (children’s form). Educ. Psychol. 5, 105–113 (1958)
Pareek, U.: Studying cultural differences in personality development with the help of Rosenzweig P-F study (1958)
Parwal, S.: Development of EHV Cables. Institute of Electrical Engineers, Mumbai (1987)
Copel, S.L.: Behaviour Pathology of Childhood and Adolescence. Basic Books Inc., New York (Bhatt, D.B. 1990) (1973)
Malhotra, M.M., Menon, P.N.: Reviewing learner evaluation in india: an inside story (After Independence - 2000). European Academic Research, vol. II, Issue 10/January 2015 (1991)
Sharma, R., Mishra, M., Gupta, B., Parsania, C., Singla-Pareek, S.L., Pareek, A.: De novo assembly and characterization of stress transcriptome in a salinity-tolerant variety CS52 of Brassica juncea. PLoS ONE, e0126783 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126783
Dhondhyal, S.: Personality study of victimised aggressors among children. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Ch. Charan Singh University, Meerut (2007)
TeacherEmpowerment, The Education Entitlement–Social Transformation Traverse, Poonam Batra, First Published January 1 (2009)
JUDGMENT Manmohan Sarin, J Page 3817, Sushil Kumar Rajput vs Director Of Education And Ors. on 24 November, 2006, Equivalent citations: 139 DLT 104 (2007)
Ilgin, M.A., Gupta, S.M.: Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. J. Environ. Manag. 91(3), 563–591 (2010)
Yadawa, P.K.: Computational study of ultrasonic parameters of HCP transition metals Fe, Co and Ni. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37, 255–262 (2012)
Pravin-Chandra, K.R.: Occupational and environmental health: an integral part of community health. RGUHS J. Med. Sci. 12(4), 34–38 (2011)
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C.: Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1998)
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Prentice Hall (2006)
Hu, L., Bentler, P.M.: Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle, R. (Ed.): Structural equation modeling: issues, concepts, and applications, pp. 76–99. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1999)
Daire, et al.: Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit, p. 2. (2008). Articles
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ramesh, V. (2018). Impact of Disruptive Technology on Juvenile Disruptive Behavior in Classroom. In: Singh, M., Gupta, P., Tyagi, V., Flusser, J., Ören, T. (eds) Advances in Computing and Data Sciences. ICACDS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 906. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1813-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1813-9_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1812-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1813-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)