Abstract
This chapter draws on the insights in previous chapters to present two visions for the use of partnerships in teacher education and the applicability of our STEPS Interpretive Framework as a language to inform and describe partnership work, and to show how education-focused partnerships can be set up to work most effectively in a range of other contexts. A discussion follows of how this framework contributes to the literature on partnerships follows as do some suggestions for limitations of their use.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACEN (2015). National strategy in work integrated learning in university education. Australian Collaborative Education Network. Retrieved September 2015 from http://cdn1.acen.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/National-WIL-Strategy-in-university-education-032015.pdf.
AITSL. (2017). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs. Guideline: Primary specialisation (Program Standard 4.4). Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Available online from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/guideline-primary-specialisation.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2015). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia, standards and procedures. Melbourne: AITSL.
Kenny, J., Hobbs, L., Speldewinde, C., Jones, M., Campbell, C., Gilbert, A., et al. (2015). Establishing school university partnerships to teach science-does what worked for us work for you? Proceedings of the European Science Education Research Association: Engaging learners for a sustainable future (pp. 2029–2040, 31 August–4 September 2015), Helsinki, Finland. ISBN 978-951-51-1541-6.
Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F., & Cherednichenko, B. (2009). Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships: Beyond determined efforts by inspired individuals. Canberra: Teaching Australia–Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Limited.
Oliver, B. (2015). Redefining graduate employability and work-integrated learning: Proposals for effective higher education in disrupted economies. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1), 56–65.
Peach, D., Cates, C., Jones, J., Lechleiter, H., & Ilg, B. (2011). Responding to rapid change in higher education: Enabling university departments responsible for work related programs through boundary spanning. Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, 45(1), 94–106. This file was downloaded from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46451/.
Sveningsson, S., & Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation. Discourse and Identity Struggle. Human Relations, 56(10), 1163–1193.
Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group.
TEQSA. (2016). Work integrated learning guidance note. The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). Available online from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/GuidanceNote_WorkIntegratedLearning%201.0.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hobbs, L., Kenny, J. (2018). Visionary Practice. In: Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Jones, M. (eds) School-based Partnerships in Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1795-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1795-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1794-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1795-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)