Skip to main content

Influencing Policy Change through Collective Action

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democratic Policies and Practices in Early Childhood Education

Abstract

Aotearoa New Zealand academics, unionists and activists have a history of acting collectively to debate, formulate and progress their collectively desired early childhood education and care (ECEC) policy directions. Meade (1990) described the critical role played by the Campaign for Quality Education in giving women and children “a foot in the door” to increase funding for ECEC when a flank of new right politicians in 1988 were cutting back government expenditure. Advocates from the early childhood teachers’ union harnessing support from families and community, and working with national early childhood organisations and academics, have been highly influential in influencing policy change through collective action. Wells (1991) has described policy change as happening “against the odds”, during a period of harsh labour laws and punitive social and economic policies in the early 1990s. Three stories of collective action are told in this chapter. They occurred during the 1990s and early 2000s: a kindergarten story of collective strategising and action to achieve pay parity of kindergarten teachers’ salaries with primary and secondary teachers, a story that started to be told by Mitchell and Wells (1997); the campaign to achieve pay parity for teachers in education and care centres and the reasons for its limited success; and the story of a collective group formed by the union for policy development that resulted in the publication and widespread endorsement of the report Future Directions: Early Childhood Education in New Zealand (Early Childhood Education Project, 1996; Wells, 1999). This report pointed the processes of consultation and direction for the subsequent government initiated ECEC strategic plan, Pathways to the Future: Ngā Huarahi Arataki (Ministry of Education, 2002). A main argument is that participatory decision-making processes that draw on a diverse range of expertise from committed individuals and organisations can generate a sound platform for ECEC policy that upholds democratic values of equity and inclusion. These Aotearoa New Zealand stories show ways in which through acting collectively in a common cause, ordinary people can have influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, G. (1991). The employment contracts act 1991: An employers charter? New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(2), 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, J. (1990). Economic and social initiative statement. Wellington, New Zealand: Government Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, K. M., Danzig, A. B., Garcia, D. R., & Callan, E. (2012). Introduction: Education, democracy, and the public good. Review of Research in Education, 36, vii–xxi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. (1999). Kindergarten and primary teachers: A comparison of their work. Wellington, New Zealand: Top Drawer Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combined Early Childhood Union of Aotearoa. (1992). Annual Report. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C. (1998). Kindergartens and their removal from the State Sector Act. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 7, 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early Childhood Education Project. (1996). Future directions: Early childhood education in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Educational Institute Te Riu Roa.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission network on childcare and other measures to reconcile employment and family responsibilities. (1996). Quality targets in services for young children. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission Equal Opportunities Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. (2015). The OIA arms race. In S. Andrew & J. Gracewood (Eds.), Tell you what: Great New Zealand nonfiction 2016 (pp. 97–106). Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2014). America’s descent into madness. Policy Futures in Education, 12(2), 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, H. (2006). A union perspective on state sector governance. Paper presented at the corporate governance in the public sector conference, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, D. (1988). Before five. Wellington, New Zealand: Government Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W., Carr, M., Soutar, B., & Mitchell, L. (2013). Understanding the Te Whāriki approach. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, H. (2005). Twenty years of consenting parties: The ‘politics of ‘working’ and ‘teaching’ in childcare 1985–2005. Wellington, New Zealand: NZEI Te Riu Roa.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, H. (2009). Politics in the playground. The world of early childhood education in New Zealand (2nd ed.). Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A. (1990). Women and children gain a foot in the door. New Zealand Women’s Studies Journal, 6(1/2), 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2002). Pathways to the future: Ngā Huarahi Arataki. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2018). ECE funding handbook. Retrieved from https://www.education.govt.nz/early-childhood/running-an-ece-service/funding/ece-funding-handbook/completing-the-rs7-return/9-6-attestation-of-certificated-teachers-salaries/

  • Mitchell, L. (2005). Policy shifts in early childhood education: Past lessons, new directions. In J. Codd & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Education policy directions in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 175–198). Southbank VIC, Australia: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L., & Wells, C. (1997). Negotiating pay parity in the early childhood sector. In New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (Ed.), Closing the gap: Forum on equal pay. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Council of Trade Unions. (1997). Closing the gap. Forum on equal pay. New Zealand Council of Trade Unions. Wellington, New Zealand: Council of Trade Unions.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Government. (1991). Employment Contracts Act 1991 (1991 No 22) from http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/eca19911991n22280/

  • NZEI Te Riu Roa. (1994a). Kindergarten teachers. The case for pay parity. Government spending and public debt. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Educational Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • NZEI Te Riu Roa. (1994b). Early childhood workers. The case for pay parity. Public spending and government debt. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Educational Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • NZEI Te Riu Roa. (2016). The early childhood education collective agreement of Aotearoa New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.nzei.org.nz/AgreementDoc/ECEA.pdf

  • Ober, J. (2008). Democracy and knowledge: Innovation and learning in classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, J. (1997, April 29). House of representatives parliamentary debates. State Sector Amendment Bill 1457. Wellington, New Zealand: Hansard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. B., Ford, V. E., Hubbard, P. M., & White, E. J. (1996). The quality of childcare centres for infants in New Zealand (State of the art monograph, 0113–4442; no 4). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University, New Zealand Association for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te One, S. (2003). The context for Te Whāriki: Contemporary issues of influence. In J. Nuttall (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki (pp. 17–49). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. (1991). The impact of change – Against the odds. Paper presented at the Early Childhood Convention, Dunedin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. (1999). Future directions: Shaping early childhood policy for the 21st century – a personal perspective. In I. Livingstone (Ed.), New Zealand Annual Review of Education (Vol. 8:1998, pp. 45–60). Wellington, New Zealand: School of Education, Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, C. (1992). First impressions: The initial impact of salary bulk funding on New Zealand kindergartens. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, L. (2019). Influencing Policy Change through Collective Action. In: Democratic Policies and Practices in Early Childhood Education. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 24. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1793-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1793-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1791-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1793-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics