Skip to main content
  • 1219 Accesses

Abstract

A central claim in this book is that over the last three decades, a dominant economic and market discourse has shaped ECEC policy and practice both in Aotearoa New Zealand and internationally. Problems and inequities emerging from this approach have run directly counter to aims for a socially just society where educational opportunities for all children and families are equitably realised. Helen Penn (2009, 2012, 2013) has been a constant and vociferous critic of education markets and for-profit ECEC and the problems when a quest for profits collides with the best interests of children and families. Following writers (e.g., Carr & Hartnett, 1996; Dahlberg, Moss & Pence, 1999; Moss & Petrie, 1997; Penn, 2012; Prout 2003) who ask critical questions about the kind of society these discourses sustain, this book turns to an alternative vision of a democratic society and the role that ECEC policy and practice might possibly play in promoting democratic values. Ideas for an alternative vision are analysed within an overarching frame of democracy, going back to Athenian origins of democracy and including recent writers on meanings and traditions of democracy in education. I take core ideas from John Dewey (1915) that democracy is something that has to be made and remade by each generation and of the capacity of education to build democratic society rather than reproduce society. Henri Giroux (1992) takes these ideas further in emphasising social criticism and struggle in his definition of democracy, while Michael Apple (2005) emphasises a commitment to “thick” collective forms of democracy. A section on democracy in Aotearoa New Zealand’s educational traditions and history harks back to 1939, after the great depression, when Aotearoa New Zealand’s Prime Minister Peter Fraser in a speech penned by Clarence Beeby the future Director General of Education famously pronounced on a vision of education as a public good and a right of the child citizen, of schools as public institutions and a public responsibility (May, 2003). Not encompassed within this vision was ECEC, which has never in Aotearoa New Zealand been treated as a public responsibility or child’s right. I use these arguments to discuss core characteristics of policy and practice for an ECEC system founded on democratic values and to set a framing for analysis in subsequent chapters. These set a scene for the book’s conclusion, which examines what conditions might be needed for an integrated and democratic ECEC system in Aotearoa New Zealand and countries that share a market approach to ECEC provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, P. (2012). Young children’s human rights: A sociological analysis. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1–2), 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1981). Politics. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertens, H. (1995). The idea of the postmodern: A history. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., & Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, D. (2007). The ABC of child care politics. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M., Davis, K., & Cowie, B. (2015). Continuity of early learning: Learning progress and outcomes in the early years. Report on the literature scan. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/ECE/continuity-of-early-learning-literature-scan

  • Carr, M., Mitchell, L., & Rameka, L. (2016). Some thoughts about the value of an OECD international assessment framework for early childhood services in Aotearoa New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(4), 450–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (1991). Education for citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 39(4), 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Hartnett, A. (1996). Education and the struggle for democracy. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach (2nd ed.). London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, G., & Krashinsky, M. (2002). Financing ECEC services in OECD countries. OECD Occasional Papers. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Post modern perspectives (1st ed.). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1915). School and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916, 1944). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1939). Creative democracy. The task before us. Retrieved from http://www.beloit.edu/~pbk/dewey.html

  • Einarsdottir, J. (2007). Research with children: methodological and ethical challenges. Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, C. (2007). Power to the people. In Raaflaub, K., Ober, J., Wallace, R., Cartledge, P., & Farrar, C. Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp9pt

  • Freeman, M. (2011). Human Rights. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings. Cultural workers and the politics of education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Early Education. (2013). To assess, to teach, to learn: A vision for the future of assessment. [Technical Report]. Retrieved from www.gordoncommission.org

  • Gundara, J. S. (2011). Ancient Athenian democratic knowledge and citizenship: Connectivity and intercultural implications. Intercultural Education, 22(4), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2011.617416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P., & MacNaughton, G. (2000). Consensus, dissensus or community: The politics of parent involvement in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(3), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmenerac, O. (2017). Doctoral thesis under examination. Constructions of teachers’ professional identities in early childhood policies and practice in Aotearoa New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (1994). Children’s rights. In B. Mayall (Ed.), Children’s childhoods: Observed and experienced (pp. 33–44). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge, UK: The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. (2002). Dr CE Beeby. The quality of education. SET, 2, 25–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. (2007). A new debate about children and childhood. Could it make a difference to early childhood pedagogy and policy? (Doctoral thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/347

  • Mitchell, L. (2010). Constructions of childhood in early childhood education policy in New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education, 11(4), 328–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. (2011). Enquiring teachers and democratic politics: Transformations in New Zealand’s early childhood landscape. Early Years. International Journal of Research and Development.https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2011.588787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (2009). There are alternatives! Markets and democratic experimentalism in early childhood education and care. [Working Paper No. 53]. The Netherlands: Bernard Van Leer Foundation and the Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (2012). Need markets be the only show in town? In E. LLoyd & H. Penn (Eds.), Childcare markets. Can they deliver an equitable service? (pp. 191–207). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., Dahlberg, G., Grieshaber, S., Mantovani, S., May, H., Pence, A., et al. (2016). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s International early learning study: Opening for debate and contestation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (1997). Children’s services: Time for a new approach. London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, R. (2001). Early childhood education - A child’s right? In B. Webber & L. Mitchell (Eds.), Early childhood education for a democratic society. New Zealand Council for Educational Research Annual Conference October 2001 (pp. 61–68). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober, J. (2008). Democracy and knowledge: Innovation and learning in classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Starting strong. Early childhood education and care. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). Starting strong 11: Early childhood education and care. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). International Early Learning and Child Wellbeing Study (IELS). Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/international-early-learning-and-child-well-being-study.htm

  • OECD. (2017). The International Early Learning and Child Well-being Study (IELS) – The study. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/the-international-early-learning-and-child-well-being-study-the-study.htm

  • Penn, H. (2009). International perspectives on quality in mixed economies of childcare. National Institute Economic Review, 207(7), 8389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, H. (2012). Childcare markets. Do they work? In E. LLoyd & H. Penn (Eds.), Childcare markets. Can they deliver an equitable service? (pp. 18–42). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, H. (2013). The business of childcare in Europe. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(4), 432–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.7883300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, F. (2016). Premium services. At what cost? Rattler, 119, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, F., & Woodrow, C. (2009). The giant in the playground: Investigating the reach and implications of the corporatisation of child care provision. In D. King & G. Meagher (Eds.), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2003, September 3–6). Children, representation and social change. Paper presented at the European Early Childhood Education Research Association 13th Annual Conference on Quality in Early Childhood Education, “Possible childhoods: relationships and choices”, Strathclyde University, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2005). The future of childhood. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raaflaub, K. (2007). Introduction. In K. Raaflaub, J. Ober, & R. Wallace (Eds.), Origins of democracy in ancient Greece (pp. 1–21). California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, W. (1998). Clarence Edward Beeby (1902–98). Prospects, XXVIII, 2, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, E., Tarrant, K., & Neuman, M. J. (2007). Alternative policy designs and the socio-political construction of childcare. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2007.8.2.98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2007). Children and young People’s participation rights in education. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15(1), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. B. (2016). Children’s rights. Towards social justice. New York: Momentum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumsion, J. (2012). ABC Learning and Australian early education and care. In E. LLoyd & H. Penn (Eds.), Childcare markets. Can they deliver an equitable service? (pp. 209–225). Bristol, England: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, K. (2015). Participation, rights and ‘participatory’ methods. In A. Farrell, S. Kagan, & K. Tisdall (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of early childhood research (pp. 73–88). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1990). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNCHR). (2014). Mid year trends 2014. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/54aa91d89.html

  • Wagner, P., Heise, N., Goller, M., Hocke, N., & Bender, N. (2016, personal communication). [The OECD’s International Early Learning Assessment: A statement on Germany’s participation in the OECD survey].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, L. (2019). Traditions of Democracy in Education. In: Democratic Policies and Practices in Early Childhood Education. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 24. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1793-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1793-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1791-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1793-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics