Abstract
A central claim in this book is that over the last three decades, a dominant economic and market discourse has shaped ECEC policy and practice both in Aotearoa New Zealand and internationally. Problems and inequities emerging from this approach have run directly counter to aims for a socially just society where educational opportunities for all children and families are equitably realised. Helen Penn (2009, 2012, 2013) has been a constant and vociferous critic of education markets and for-profit ECEC and the problems when a quest for profits collides with the best interests of children and families. Following writers (e.g., Carr & Hartnett, 1996; Dahlberg, Moss & Pence, 1999; Moss & Petrie, 1997; Penn, 2012; Prout 2003) who ask critical questions about the kind of society these discourses sustain, this book turns to an alternative vision of a democratic society and the role that ECEC policy and practice might possibly play in promoting democratic values. Ideas for an alternative vision are analysed within an overarching frame of democracy, going back to Athenian origins of democracy and including recent writers on meanings and traditions of democracy in education. I take core ideas from John Dewey (1915) that democracy is something that has to be made and remade by each generation and of the capacity of education to build democratic society rather than reproduce society. Henri Giroux (1992) takes these ideas further in emphasising social criticism and struggle in his definition of democracy, while Michael Apple (2005) emphasises a commitment to “thick” collective forms of democracy. A section on democracy in Aotearoa New Zealand’s educational traditions and history harks back to 1939, after the great depression, when Aotearoa New Zealand’s Prime Minister Peter Fraser in a speech penned by Clarence Beeby the future Director General of Education famously pronounced on a vision of education as a public good and a right of the child citizen, of schools as public institutions and a public responsibility (May, 2003). Not encompassed within this vision was ECEC, which has never in Aotearoa New Zealand been treated as a public responsibility or child’s right. I use these arguments to discuss core characteristics of policy and practice for an ECEC system founded on democratic values and to set a framing for analysis in subsequent chapters. These set a scene for the book’s conclusion, which examines what conditions might be needed for an integrated and democratic ECEC system in Aotearoa New Zealand and countries that share a market approach to ECEC provision.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alderson, P. (2012). Young children’s human rights: A sociological analysis. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20, 177–198.
Apple, M. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1–2), 11–29.
Aristotle. (1981). Politics. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Bertens, H. (1995). The idea of the postmodern: A history. London, UK: Routledge.
Biesta, G., & Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63–79.
Brennan, D. (2007). The ABC of child care politics. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 212–225.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carr, M., Davis, K., & Cowie, B. (2015). Continuity of early learning: Learning progress and outcomes in the early years. Report on the literature scan. Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/ECE/continuity-of-early-learning-literature-scan
Carr, M., Mitchell, L., & Rameka, L. (2016). Some thoughts about the value of an OECD international assessment framework for early childhood services in Aotearoa New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(4), 450–454.
Carr, W. (1991). Education for citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 39(4), 373–385.
Carr, W., & Hartnett, A. (1996). Education and the struggle for democracy. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach (2nd ed.). London: National Children’s Bureau.
Cleveland, G., & Krashinsky, M. (2002). Financing ECEC services in OECD countries. OECD Occasional Papers. Paris: OECD.
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Post modern perspectives (1st ed.). London: Falmer Press.
Dewey, J. (1915). School and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1916, 1944). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan
Dewey, J. (1939). Creative democracy. The task before us. Retrieved from http://www.beloit.edu/~pbk/dewey.html
Einarsdottir, J. (2007). Research with children: methodological and ethical challenges. Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 197–211.
Farrar, C. (2007). Power to the people. In Raaflaub, K., Ober, J., Wallace, R., Cartledge, P., & Farrar, C. Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp9pt
Freeman, M. (2011). Human Rights. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings. Cultural workers and the politics of education. London: Routledge.
Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Early Education. (2013). To assess, to teach, to learn: A vision for the future of assessment. [Technical Report]. Retrieved from www.gordoncommission.org
Gundara, J. S. (2011). Ancient Athenian democratic knowledge and citizenship: Connectivity and intercultural implications. Intercultural Education, 22(4), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2011.617416.
Hughes, P., & MacNaughton, G. (2000). Consensus, dissensus or community: The politics of parent involvement in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(3), 241–258.
Karmenerac, O. (2017). Doctoral thesis under examination. Constructions of teachers’ professional identities in early childhood policies and practice in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Lansdown, G. (1994). Children’s rights. In B. Mayall (Ed.), Children’s childhoods: Observed and experienced (pp. 33–44). London: The Falmer Press.
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge, UK: The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, G. (2002). Dr CE Beeby. The quality of education. SET, 2, 25–27.
Mitchell, L. (2007). A new debate about children and childhood. Could it make a difference to early childhood pedagogy and policy? (Doctoral thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/347
Mitchell, L. (2010). Constructions of childhood in early childhood education policy in New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education, 11(4), 328–341.
Mitchell, L. (2011). Enquiring teachers and democratic politics: Transformations in New Zealand’s early childhood landscape. Early Years. International Journal of Research and Development.https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2011.588787.
Moss, P. (2009). There are alternatives! Markets and democratic experimentalism in early childhood education and care. [Working Paper No. 53]. The Netherlands: Bernard Van Leer Foundation and the Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Moss, P. (2012). Need markets be the only show in town? In E. LLoyd & H. Penn (Eds.), Childcare markets. Can they deliver an equitable service? (pp. 191–207). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Moss, P., Dahlberg, G., Grieshaber, S., Mantovani, S., May, H., Pence, A., et al. (2016). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s International early learning study: Opening for debate and contestation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 343–351.
Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (1997). Children’s services: Time for a new approach. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Noonan, R. (2001). Early childhood education - A child’s right? In B. Webber & L. Mitchell (Eds.), Early childhood education for a democratic society. New Zealand Council for Educational Research Annual Conference October 2001 (pp. 61–68). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Ober, J. (2008). Democracy and knowledge: Innovation and learning in classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
OECD. (2001). Starting strong. Early childhood education and care. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD. (2006). Starting strong 11: Early childhood education and care. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD. (2016). International Early Learning and Child Wellbeing Study (IELS). Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/international-early-learning-and-child-well-being-study.htm
OECD. (2017). The International Early Learning and Child Well-being Study (IELS) – The study. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/the-international-early-learning-and-child-well-being-study-the-study.htm
Penn, H. (2009). International perspectives on quality in mixed economies of childcare. National Institute Economic Review, 207(7), 83–89.
Penn, H. (2012). Childcare markets. Do they work? In E. LLoyd & H. Penn (Eds.), Childcare markets. Can they deliver an equitable service? (pp. 18–42). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Penn, H. (2013). The business of childcare in Europe. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(4), 432–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.7883300.
Press, F. (2016). Premium services. At what cost? Rattler, 119, 11–13.
Press, F., & Woodrow, C. (2009). The giant in the playground: Investigating the reach and implications of the corporatisation of child care provision. In D. King & G. Meagher (Eds.), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.
Prout, A. (2003, September 3–6). Children, representation and social change. Paper presented at the European Early Childhood Education Research Association 13th Annual Conference on Quality in Early Childhood Education, “Possible childhoods: relationships and choices”, Strathclyde University, Glasgow.
Prout, A. (2005). The future of childhood. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Raaflaub, K. (2007). Introduction. In K. Raaflaub, J. Ober, & R. Wallace (Eds.), Origins of democracy in ancient Greece (pp. 1–21). California: University of California Press.
Renwick, W. (1998). Clarence Edward Beeby (1902–98). Prospects, XXVIII, 2, 335–348.
Rigby, E., Tarrant, K., & Neuman, M. J. (2007). Alternative policy designs and the socio-political construction of childcare. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2007.8.2.98.
Smith, A. (2007). Children and young People’s participation rights in education. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15(1), 147–164.
Smith, A. B. (2016). Children’s rights. Towards social justice. New York: Momentum Press.
Sumsion, J. (2012). ABC Learning and Australian early education and care. In E. LLoyd & H. Penn (Eds.), Childcare markets. Can they deliver an equitable service? (pp. 209–225). Bristol, England: The Policy Press.
Tisdall, K. (2015). Participation, rights and ‘participatory’ methods. In A. Farrell, S. Kagan, & K. Tisdall (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of early childhood research (pp. 73–88). Los Angeles: Sage.
United Nations. (1990). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNCHR). (2014). Mid year trends 2014. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/54aa91d89.html
Wagner, P., Heise, N., Goller, M., Hocke, N., & Bender, N. (2016, personal communication). [The OECD’s International Early Learning Assessment: A statement on Germany’s participation in the OECD survey].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitchell, L. (2019). Traditions of Democracy in Education. In: Democratic Policies and Practices in Early Childhood Education. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 24. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1793-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1793-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1791-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1793-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)