Advertisement

Fatigue Life Prediction of Ceramic-Matrix Composites

  • Longbiao LiEmail author
Chapter
  • 486 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, the fatigue lifetime of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) at room and elevated temperatures is predicted for different testing conditions and fiber preforms. The relationships among the broken fibers fraction, applied cycle numbers, and the fatigue peak stress are established. At room temperature, the damage mechanisms of fiber/matrix interface wear degrade the fiber/matrix interface shear stress and fibers strength; and at elevated temperature in oxidative atmosphere, the damage mechanisms of fiber/matrix interface wear and oxidation degrade the fiber/matrix interface shear stress and fibers strength. The fibers broken fraction in different damage regions is determined, i.e., the interface wear region, interface oxidation region, interface debonded region, and interface bonded region. When the fibers broken fraction approaches to the critical value, the composites fatigue fracture. The fatigue limit stress and fatigue life SN curve of fiber-reinforced CMCs with different fibers preform are predicted, i.e., the unidirectional C/SiC, SiC/CAS, SiC/1723 and SiC/Si3N4, cross-ply C/SiC, SiC/CAS, SiC/1723 and SiC/BMAS, 2D woven C/SiC and SiC/SiC, 2/5D woven C/SiC, and 3D braided C/SiC composites.

Keywords

Ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) S–N curves Matrix cracking Interface debonding Fibers failure 

References

  1. 1.
    Li LB (2010) Fatigue damage models and life prediction of long-fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites. Ph.D. thesis, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li LB (2013) Fatigue hysteresis behavior of cross-ply C/SiC ceramic matrix composites at room and elevated temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 586:160–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.08.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shuler SF, Holmes JW, Wu X (1993) Influence of loading frequency on the room-temperature fatigue of a carbon-fiber/SiC-matrix composite. J Am Ceram Soc 76:2327–2336.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb07772.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu MP, Tong XY, Ren SH, Yao LJ (2014) Fatigue behavior and life prediction of 2D C/SiC under room temperature. Adv Aeronaut Sci Eng 5:104–108Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Min JB, Xue D, Shi Y (2014) Micromechanics modeling for fatigue damage analysis designed for fabric reinforced ceramic matrix composites. Compos Struct 111:213–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mall S, Engesser JM (2006) Effects of frequency on fatigue behavior of CVI C/SiC at elevated temperature. Compos Sci Technol 66:863–874.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng QY, Tong XY, Zheng X, Zhou J, Yao LJ, Li B (2010) Experimental investigation on the fatigue characteristics about high temperature of plain-woven C/SiC composite. J Mech Strength 32:819–823Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Du SM, Qiao SR, Ji GC, Han D (2002) Tension-tension fatigue behavior of 3D-C/SiC composite at room temperature and 1300 °C. Mater Eng 9:22–25Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Du SM, Qiao SR (2011) Tension-tension fatigue behavior of 3D-C/SiC composite at 1500 °C. Mater Eng 5:34–37Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reynaud P (1996) Cyclic fatigue of ceramic-matrix composites at ambient and elevated temperatures. Compos Sci Technol 56:809–814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(96)00025-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mall S (2005) Effects of moisture on fatigue behavior of SiC/SiC composite at elevated temperature. Mater Sci Eng A 412:165–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mizuno M, Zhu SJ, Nagano Y, Sakaida Y, Kagawa Y, Watanabe M (1996) Cyclic-fatigue behavior of SiC/SiC composites at room and high temperatures. J Am Ceram Soc 79:3065–3018.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08078.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michael WK (2010) Fatigue behavior of a SiC/SiC composite at 1000 °C in air and steam. AFIT/GAE/ENY/10-D01Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jacob D (2010) Fatigue behavior of an advanced SiC/SiC composite with an oxidation inhibited matrix at 1200 °C in air and in steam. AFIT/GEA/ENY/10-M07Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu SJ, Mizuno M, Nagano Y, Cao JW, Kagawa Y, Kaya H (1998) Creep and fatigue behavior in an enhanced SiC/SiC composite at high temperature. J Am Ceram Soc 81:2269–2277.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02621.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruggles-Wrenn MB, Sharma V (2011) Effects of steam environment on fatigue behavior of two SiC/[SiC + Si3N4] ceramic composites at 1300 °C. Appl Compos Mater 18(5):385–396.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-010-9163-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shi DQ, Jing X, Yang XG (2015) Low cycle fatigue behavior of a 3D braided KD-I fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composite for coated and uncoated specimens at 1100 °C and 1300 °C. Mater Sci Eng A 631:38–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li LB (2016) Fatigue hysteresis of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites at room and elevated temperatures. Appl Compos Mater 23:1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-015-9448-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li LB (2014) Modeling fatigue hysteresis behavior of unidirectional C/SiC ceramic-matrix composite. Compos B 66:466–474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li LB (2016) Fatigue life prediction of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites at room and elevated temperatures. Part I: experimental analysis. Appl Compos Mater 23:101–117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-015-9446-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li LB (2016) Effects of temperature, oxidation and fiber preforms on fatigue life of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites. Appl Compos Mater 23:799–819.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-016-9486-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li LB (2016) Comparisons of fatigue life between C/SiC and SiC/SiC ceramic-matrix composites at room and elevated temperatures. Appl Compos Mater 23:913–952.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-016-9492-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li LB (2016) Fatigue life prediction of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites with different fiber preforms at room and elevated temperatures. Materials 9:207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li LB, Reynaud P, Fantozzi G (2017) Tension-tension fatigue behavior of unidirectional SiC/Si3N4 composite with strong and weak interface bonding at room temperature. Ceram Int 43:8769–8777.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li LB (2015) Fatigue life prediction of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites at room and elevated temperatures. Part II: experimental comparisons. Appl Compos Mater 22:961–972.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-015-9445-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Evans AG, Zok FW, McMeeking RM (1995) Fatigue of ceramic matrix composites. Acta Metall Mater 43(3):859–875.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(94)00304-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee SS, Stinchcomb WW (1994) Damage mechanisms of cross-ply Nicalon/CAS-II laminate under cyclic tension. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 15(4):40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Curtin WA, Ahn BK, Takeda N (1998) Modeling brittle and tough stress-strain behavior in unidirectional ceramic matrix composites. Acta Mater 46(10):3409–3420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00041-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lamouroux F, Camus G, Thebault J (1994) Kinetics and mechanisms of oxidation of 2D woven C/SiC composites: I, experimental approach. J Am Ceram Soc 77(8):2049–2057.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07096.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Halbig MC, McGuffin-Cawley JD, Eckel AJ, Brewer DN (2008) Oxidation kinetics and stress effects for the oxidation of continuous carbon fibers within a microcracked C/SiC ceramic matrix composite. J Am Ceram Soc 91(2):519–526.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02170.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Filipuzzi L, Naslain R (1994) Oxidation mechanisms and kinetics of 1D-SiC/C/SiC composite materials: II, Modelling. J Am Ceram Soc 77(2):467–480.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07016.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Naslain R (2004) Design, preparation and properties of non-oxide CMCs for application in engines and nuclear reactors: an overview. Compos Sci Technol 64(2):155–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lara-Curzio E (1999) Analysis of oxidation-assisted stress-rupture of continuous fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites at intermediate temperatures. Compos A 30(4):549–554.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00148-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Casas L, Martinez-Esnaola JM (2003) Modelling the effect of oxidation on the creep behavior of fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites. Acta Mater 51(13):3745–3757.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00189-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Opalski FA (1992) Fatigue behavior of a cross-ply ceramic matrix composite under tension-tension and tension-compression loading. M.S. thesis, AFIT/GAE/ENY/92D, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OhioGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karandikar PG (1992) Evolution of damage and mechanical response in ceramic matrix composites under monotonic and fatigue loading: experimental characterization and modeling. University of Delaware, PhDGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kim J, Liaw PK (2005) Characterization of fatigue damage modes in Nicalon/Calcium Aluminosilicate composites. J Eng Mater Technol 127(1):8–15.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1836766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zawada LP, Butkus LM, Hartman GA (1991) Tensile and fatigue behavior of silicon carbide fiber-reinforced aluminosilicate glass. J Am Ceram Soc 74(11):2851–2858.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06854.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vanwijgenhoven E, Weavers M, Biest O (1999) Influence of the laminate lay-up on the fatigue behavior of SiC-fiber/BMAS-matrix composites. Compos A 30(5):623–635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00177-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rouby D, Reynaud P (1993) Fatigue behavior related to interface modification during load cycling in ceramic-matrix fiber composites. Compos Sci Technol 48(1–4):109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(93)90126-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations