Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Interpersonal Coordination
  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

There are laboratory and field experiments for approaches to joint action. We have to study interpersonal information-processing in joint action according to the merits and demerits in field and laboratory experiments. Emergent and planned coordination is separately studied so far. But human actions are not clearly divided by emergent and planned coordination. Thus, it may be necessary to recognize hybrid forms of coordination which are part emergent, part planned. In future studies, we will examine three experiments as follows: first, pairs of participants make complementary and synchronous force production exclusively when the target force shared by the participants and the total force produced by them are presented visually. This innovative finding suggests that two participants represent the target force shared by them in their brain. Thus, we have to find a behavioral indicator as the representation of the action target shared by two participants. Second, focusing a target of our study to a task of force production, we have to examine effects of different combinations of types of force production (continuous, periodic, or discrete force production) and target force (relative or absolute value) on the two-heads-better-than-one effect. Third, we have to examine a hypothesis (social loafing) that an increase in the number of participants in joint action resulted in a decrease in individual contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bahrami B, Olsen K, Latham PE, Roepstorff A, Rees G, Frith CD (2010) Optimally interacting minds. Science 329:1081–1085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bosga J, Meulenbroek RG (2007) Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. Mot Control 11:235–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfill SA (2018) Coordinating joint action. In: Ludwig K (ed) The Routledge handbook on collective intentionality. Routledge, London, pp 68–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Czyz SH, Szmajke A, Kruger A, Kuber M (2016) Participation in team sports can eliminate the effect of social loafing. Percept Mot Skills 123:754–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh G, Takagi A, Osu R, Yoshioka T, Kawato M, Burdet E (2014) Two is better than one: physical interactions improve motor performance in humans. Sci Rep 4:3824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham AG, Levinger G, Graves J, Peckham V (1974) The Ringelmann effect: studies of group size and group performance. J Exp Soc Psychol 10:371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karau SJ, Williams KD (1993) Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:681–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijima A, Kadota K, Yokoyama K, Okumura M, Suzuki H, Schmidt RC, Yamamoto Y (2012) Switching dynamics in an interpersonal competition brings about “deadlock” synchronization of players. PLoS One 7:e47911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich G, Butterfill S, Sebanz N (2011) Psychological research on joint action: theory and data. In: Ross B (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 54. Academic, Burlington, pp 59–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat A (2012) When are two heads better than one and why? Science 336:360–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz DA, Martin B (1986) Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article. J Pers Soc Psychol 50:936–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latané B, Williams K, Harkins S (1979) Many hands make light the work: the causes and consequences of social loafing. J Pers Soc Psychol 37:822–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehr DJ, Vesper C (2016) The sound of you and me: novices represent shared goals in joint action. Quart J Exp Psychol 69:536–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto J, Inui N (2013) Two heads are better then one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. J Neurophysiol 109:1307–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto J, Inui N (2017) A common force-sharing pattern in joint action that consists of four people. J Mot Behav: 1–11 (published online)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman-Norlund RD, van Schie HT, van Zuijlen AMJ, Bekkering H (2007) The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat Neurosci 10:817–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman-Norlund RD, Bosga J, Meulenbroek RG, Bekkering H (2008) Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: virtual lifting and balancing. NeuroImage 41:169–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okumura M, Kijima A, Kadota K, Yokoyama K, Suzuki H, Yamamoto Y (2012) A critical interpersonal distance switches between two coordination modes in kendo matches. PLoS One 7:e51877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Passos P, Milho J, Fonseca S, Borges J, Araújo D, Davids K (2011) Interpersonal distance regulates functional grouping tendencies of agents in team sports. J Mot Behav 43:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva P, Duarte R, Sampaio J, Aguiar P, Davids K, Araújo D, Garganta J (2014) Field dimension and skill level constrain team tactical behaviors in small-sided and conditioned games in football. J Sports Sci 32:1888–1896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto Y, Yokoyama K (2011) Common and unique network dynamics in football games. PLoS One 6:e29638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Inui, N. (2018). Conclusion. In: Interpersonal Coordination. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1765-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics