Skip to main content

Occurrence Order of Shop-Around Purposes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Kaiyu Studies

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 19))

Abstract

Recent studies have been paying much attention on trip-chaining behavior. However, shop-around trip-chaining behavior at a midtown district has not yet been fully explored. In particular, there is a lack of empirical facts about its purpose transition. Based on the citizen survey conducted by Saga City Government, this research analyzes how many purpose transitions occur before quitting and constructs ratio scale to account for what type of purpose is preferred in what steps of shop-around. Findings are quitting rate of shop-around increases as steps proceed; purpose transition probability is non-stationary; and there are two kinds of purposes which are more likely to occur early or later.

This chapter is based on the paper, Saburo Saito [17] “Duration and Order of Purpose Transition Occurred in the Shop-around Trip Chain at a Midtown District,” Papers on City Planning, No.23, pp. 55–60, 1988, in Japanese with English abstract. Small modifications are made at this time for this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The classification of derived and non-derived purposes is derived from focusing on the fact that derived purposes occur as a means to carry out other purposes. In other words, it tries to distinguish between a behavior where the behavior itself is performed as the purpose and a behavior where the behavior is performed as the means to carry out other purposes. It is the same as the distinction between discretionary and mandatory purposes. While purposes such as “picking up” someone or going to meet someone by “appointment” can occur by themselves even if there are no other planned purposes, the purposes of “parking” and “passing by” are assumed to have some other planned purposes. Hence, they are classified as non-derived and derived purposes, respectively.

    The difference between the analysis of all purposes and the analysis restricted to the derived purposes is easy to understand through the following example. Assume that shop-around involves the route such as purpose 1 → passing by → purpose 1. In this case, as for the analysis limited to the non-derived purposes excluding “passing by,” the number of shop-around steps does not increase and stays equal to one because purpose 1 did not change since the purposes before and after “passing by.” are the same as purpose 1 so that no purpose transition is considered to occur.

    In contrast, as for all purposes, the purpose transitions occurred two times, from purpose 1 to “passing by” and from “passing by” to purpose 1 so that the number of shop-around steps increases by 2. If one is concerned with how many different discretionary purposes occur in one trip, it is necessary to conduct the analysis limited to non-derived purposes. The reason for including the purpose of “passing by” is to apply this purpose to the evaluation of downtown spatial structure [12].

  2. 2.

    The Wilcoxon test of the homogeneity of stratified survival functions was performed. The results are shown here. As the Wilcoxon statistic compares the two survival functions, it becomes a chi-square distribution with one degree of freedom. To show the results as (χ2-value:p-value), they become by mode (43.01: 0.0001), by arrival time (4.20: 0.0404), and by weekday/weekend (6.83: 0.0090).

  3. 3.

    Refer to Amemiya ([1], p. 417) for the method of the likelihood ratio test. The shop-around steps from the sixth step and above is collapsed into one step, and the degree of freedom is calculated by deducting the number of random zeroes, which gives DF = 515 and χ 2 = 92 for all purposes excluding “returning home,” and DF = 418 and χ 2 = 831 for non-derived purposes, with p < 0.001 for both.

References

  1. Amemiya T (1985) Advanced econometrics. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fukami T (1974) A study on pedestrian flows in commercial district part 1. Pap City Plan:43–48. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fukami T (1977) A study on pedestrian flows in a commercial district part 2. Pap City Plan:61–66. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hagishima S, Mitsuyoshi K, Kurose S (1987) Estimation of pedestrian shopping trips in a neighborhood by using a spatial interaction model. Environ Plan A 19:1139–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kondo K (1987) Transport behavior analysis. KoyoShobo. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saito S (1983) Present situation and challenges for the commercial districts in Nobeoka Area. In: Committee for Modernizing Commerce Nobeoka Region Section (ed) The report of regional plan for modernizing commerce Nobeoka area. pp 36–96. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saito S (1984) A disaggregate hierarchical Huff model with considering consumer’s shop-around choice among commercial districts: developing SCOPES (Saga Commercial Policy Evaluation System). Plan Publ Manag 13:73–82. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saito S (1984) A survey report on the modified Huff model: the development of SCOPES (Saga Commercial Policy Evaluation System) (in Japanese): development of SCOPE (Saga Commercial Policy Evaluation System). Saga City Government, Saga City. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saito S (1986) Analysis report of Saga citizen opinion survey: City attractiveness and policy demand of Saga City, Saga City Government. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saito S (1988) Assessing the space structure of central shopping district viewed from consumers’ shop-around behaviors: a case study of the Midtown District of Saga City. Fukuoka Univ Econ Rev 33:47–108. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saito S (1988) Ratio scaling and scale decomposition of rank ordered choice set data: an application of positive reciprocal matrix theory. Fukuoka Univ Rev Econ 33:1–46. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sakamoto T (1984) An absorbing Markov chain model for estimating consumers’ shop-around effect on commercial districts. Pap City Plan:289–294. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. SAS Institute (1985) Proc LIFETEST. In: SAS user’s guide: statistics

    Google Scholar 

  16. Takeuchi S (1981) A model for location planning of commercial functions. Plan Publ Manag:25–33. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saito S (1988) Duration and order of purpose transition occurred in the shop-around trip chain at a midtown district. Pap City Plan:55–60. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saburo Saito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saito, S. (2018). Occurrence Order of Shop-Around Purposes. In: Saito, S., Yamashiro, K. (eds) Advances in Kaiyu Studies. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1739-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics