Comparative Study of Cutting Fluid Application Methods to Improve Machining Conditions During Surface Grinding on AISI 1040 Steel

  • I. Kantharaj
  • M. SekarEmail author
  • X. Ajay Vasanth
  • S. Mohanasundaram
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Finishing operations play a very important role in machining as they help to achieve the desired high-quality surface. Surface grinding, a widely employed finishing process uses wheels made of abrasive grains mixed with a bonding material. At the initial stages of the grinding process, the structure of the grain in the wheel will be in upright condition as the abrasive grains are sharp. As the process proceeds, abrasive grains become blunt due to the cutting force and the heat generated at the interface, thereby reducing the surface quality of the workpiece. Application of the coolant at the primary cutting zone reduces the temperature and also improves the grinding but at the cost of the environmental and health hazards which is prominent in the grinding process. In this research article, comparative experimental investigations between the different methods of application of coolant namely flood and minimal quantity lubricant (MQL) with the dry grinding process are carried out. It is the MQL method of coolant application that offers a desirable grinding operation, with reduced environmental impact and health hazards.


Surface grinding Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) Dry grinding Surface roughness 


  1. 1.
    Irani, R.A., Bauer, R.J., Warkentin, A.: A review of cutting fluid application in the grinding process. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 45, 1696–1705 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, C., Abe, S., Noda, M.: The influence of grinding oil viscosity on grinding heat and burn damage in creep-feed grinding. Lubr. Eng. 51, 8 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, X., Rowe, W.B., McCormack, D.F.: Analysis of the transitional temperature for tensile residual stress in grinding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 107, 216–221 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Desai, O., Bahadur, S.: Material removal and subsurface damage studies in dry and lubricated single-point scratch tests on alumina and silicon nitride. Wear 225, 1264–1275 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ebbrell, S., Woolley, N.H., Tridimas, Y.D., Allanson, D.R., Rowe, W.B.: The effects of cutting fluid application methods on the grinding process. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40, 209–223 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, C.Y., Wei, X., Pan, X.C., Song, Y.X.: Effects of surfactant in stone machining. Key Eng. Mater. 250, 194–199 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ge, P.Q., Li, J.F., Lu, C.H., Liu, Z.C.: Performance evaluation & action mechanism analysis of extreme pressure additives used for oil-based cutting fluids. Key Eng. Mater. 250, 281–286 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rowe, W.B., Jin, T.: Temperatures in high efficiency deep grinding (HEDG). CIRP Ann. 50(1), 205–208 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Webster, J., Brinksmeier, E., Heinzel, C., Wittmann, M., Thoens, K.: Assessment of grinding fluid effectiveness in continuous-dress creep feed grinding. CIRP Ann. 51, 235–240 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tawakoli, T., Hadad, M., Sadeghi, M.H., Daneshi, A., Sadeghi, B.: Minimum quantity lubrication in grinding: effects of abrasive and coolant-lubricant types. J. Cleaner Prod. 19, 2088–2099 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morgan, M.N., Barczak, L., Batako, A.: Temperatures in fine grinding with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 60, 951–958 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dureja, J.S., Singh, R., Singh, T., Singh, P., Dogra, M., Bhatti, M.S.: Performance evaluation of coated carbide tool in machining of stainless steel (AISI 202) under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol. 2, 123–129 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sekar, M., Yang, S.H.: Design and implementation of high-performance real-time free-form NURBS interpolator in micro CNC machine tool. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 42, 296–311 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mao, C., Tang, X., Zou, H., Huang, X., Zhou, Z.: Investigation of grinding characteristic using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 13, 1745–1752 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, X., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, B., Yang, M., Guo, S., Liu, G., Zhang, N: Lubricating property of MQL grinding of Al2O3/SiC mixed nanofluid with different particle sizes and microtopography analysis by cross-correlation. Precis. Eng. 47, 532–545 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brusly, A., Sekar, M., Yang, S.H.: Analytical expression for thermal conductivity of heat pipe. Appl. Therm. Eng. 100, 462–467 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hadad, M., Sharbati, A.: Thermal aspects of environmentally friendly-MQL grinding process. Proc. CIRP 40, 509–515 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, B., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Jia, D., Yang, M.: Grinding temperature and energy ratio coefficient in MQL grinding of high-temperature nickel-base alloy by using different vegetable oils as base oil. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 29(4), 1084–1095 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lukasz, M.B., Batako, A.D.: Application of minimum quantity lubrication in grinding. Mater. Manuf. Processes 27, 406–411 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Kantharaj
    • 1
  • M. Sekar
    • 2
    Email author
  • X. Ajay Vasanth
    • 1
  • S. Mohanasundaram
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKarunya Institute of Technology and ScienceCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAAA College of Engineering and TechnologySivakasiIndia

Personalised recommendations