Effect of Flushing on Electrochemical Micromachining of Copper and Inconel 718 Alloy

  • K. PooranachandranEmail author
  • J. Deepak
  • P. Hariharan
  • B. Mouliprasanth
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Electrochemical micromachining (ECMM) is used on conductive materials to make complex features on the workpiece. The application of ECMM process has been limited due to factors such as overcut and taper formation during the machining of microholes. Passivation layer formation is an important issue in ECMM. During electrochemical micromachining process, metal hydroxides are formed at the workpiece–tool interface and get accumulated between the tool and the workpiece which forms a passivation layer. This passivation layer widens the flow of current and affects the accuracy of the machined hole. In this research work, an attempt has been made to improve the circularity of the machined hole by effectively removing the passivation layer formed at the workpiece tool interface using electrolyte flushing technique (EFT). Using EFT, copper and Inconel 718 alloy were machined with brass and copper tool electrodes, respectively. Material removal rate (MRR), circularity and taper angle were considered as primary output response parameters. Various flushing flow rates of electrolyte were taken as input parameters to study the effect of oxide layers formed in and around the tool–workpiece interface. Single-factor experiment optimization techniques were used for the fabrication of microholes. The result clearly shows that the usage of EFT on micromachining removes the passivation layer under different flow rates.


Electrochemical micromachining Passivation layer EFT 


  1. 1.
    Bhattacharyya, B., Munda, J., Malapati, M.: Advancement in electrochemical micro-machining. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44, 1577–1589 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loutrel, S.P.: Electrochemial Machining: Prediction of Operating Parameters Including Extreme Operating Conditions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1971)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bannard, J.: Electrochemical machining. J. Appl. Electrochem. 7, 1–29 (1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rajurkar, K.P., Zhu, D., Wei, B.: Minimization of machining allowance in electrochemical machining. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 47, 165–168 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, F., et al.: A micro-machining system based on electrochemical dissolution of material. Russ. J. Electrochem. 47, 819–824 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Munda, J., Malapati, M., Bhattacharya, B.: Control of micro-spark and stray-current effect during EMM process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 194, 151–158 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rajurkar, K.P., Zhu, D., McGeough, J.A., Kozak, J., Silva, A.D.: New developments in electro-chemical machining. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 48, 567–579 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghosal, B., Bhattarcharya, B.: Influence of vibration on micro-tool fabrication by electrochemical machining. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 64, 49–59 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, Y.J., Tang, Y.J., Liu, X.K., et al.: Development of ultra-short pulse power supply applicable to micro-ECM. Mater. Sci. Forum 626–627, 369–374 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., Zhu, D., Xing, J.: Tube electrode high-speed electrochemical discharge drilling using low-conductivity salt solution. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 92, 10–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadagopan, P., Mouliprasanth, B.: Investigation on the influence of different types of dielectrics in EDM. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Pooranachandran
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Deepak
    • 1
  • P. Hariharan
    • 1
  • B. Mouliprasanth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing EngineeringCollege of Engineering Guindy, Anna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations