Advertisement

Experimental Investigation of Electrochemical Micro-machining Process Parameters on Stainless Steel 316 Using Sodium Chloride Electrolyte

  • T. GeethapriyanEmail author
  • R. Manoj Samson
  • J. Thavamani
  • A. C. Arun Raj
  • Bharadwaj Reddy Pulagam
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

In this paper, the experimental investigation of electrochemical micro-machining (ECMM) process on stainless steel 316 by varying the effect of applied voltage, electrolyte concentration, micro-tool feed rate and duty cycle. The machining performance such as material removal rate (MRR) and overcut (OC). Taguchi design of experiment has been used to carry out the design of input process parameters and their levels. Microscopic image has been used to study the surface topography of the electrochemical micro-machined work piece surface. The experimental results attain that the effect of electrolyte concentration and duty cycle has most significant factors for the machining of stainless steel 316 by electrochemical micro-machining (ECMM) process. The optimize process parameters for higher material removal rate and lower overcut are found out using grey relational approach, and finally, the confirmation tests were carried out in the electrochemical micro-machining process.

Keywords

Stainless steel-316 NaCl electrolyte Copper tool electrode Orthogonal machining Taguchi method 

References

  1. 1.
    Munda, J., Bhattacharyya, B.: Investigation into electrochemical micromachining (EMM) through response surface methodology based approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 35, 821–832 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munda, J., Malapati, M., Bhattacharyya, B.: Control of micro-spark and stray-current effect during EMM process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 194, 151–158 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rajurkar, K.P., Zhu, D., McGeough, J.A., Kozak, J., De Silva, A.: New Developments in Electro-Chemical Machining. National science foundationGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rajurkar, K.P., Zhu, D., We, B.: Minimization of machining allowance in electrochemical machining. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86, 200–207 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhattacharyya*, B., Sorkhel, S.K.: Investigation for controlled electrochemical machining through response surface methodology-based approach. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86, 200–207 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhattacharyya*, B., Doloi, B.N., Sorkhel, S.K.: Experimental investigations into electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) of non-conductive ceramic materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 95, 145–154 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhattacharyya, B., Malapati, M., Munda, J., Sarkar, A.: Influence of tool vibration on machining performance in electrochemical micro-machining of copper. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 47, 335–342 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malapatiand, M., Bhattacharyya, B.: Investigation into electrochemical micromachining process during micro-channel generation. Mater. Manuf. Process. 26, 1019–1027 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Geethapriyan
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Manoj Samson
    • 1
  • J. Thavamani
    • 1
  • A. C. Arun Raj
    • 1
  • Bharadwaj Reddy Pulagam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSRM UniversityKattankulathur, ChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations