Policy Interventions for Sustainable Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries

  • Malladi SindhujaEmail author
  • Krishnan Narayanan


Waste collection in developing countries is largely dependant on the informal sector where the waste pickers collect and sort the wastes manually for extremely low wages in unsafe and unhygienic conditions that put them at health risk. It is important to integrate informal workers into the waste management systems through policy intervention. Developing countries which have no or less stringent regulations are the pollution havens for waste disposal for the developed world. The social costs of improper waste management are the negative externalities on public health and the environment. According to the World Bank report on sanitation, improper waste disposal leads to economic losses in the form of death, increased costs on health treatment, loss of productivity time and ecosystem losses. Most of the Asian countries have poor waste management practices due to lack of policy intervention, collection inefficiency, limited financial resources and lack of technology. The major issue in solid waste management (SWM) is the failure to recognise it as an important economic problem. The economist A.C. Pigou’s work became the basis for using economic tools such as taxes and subsidies to avoid the problems associated with externalities. In many countries, the costs of waste disposal are zero. When waste disposal is not priced, it creates negative externalities like the NIMBY (not in my backyard) syndrome. In order to reduce externalities, economists have designed several tax and subsidy schemes. History of economic policy in theory and practice show that different combinations of economic and regulatory instruments could lead to a socially optimum quantity of garbage and recycling. The following paper is an attempt to critically evaluate certain policy instruments that lead to cost-effective SWM and other economic benefits. Further, this paper attempts to offer policy suggestions particularly for developing countries that have been languishing poor waste management practices for years.


Informal sector Pollution havens Social costs Negative externalities Solid waste management Taxes Subsidies Recycling Policy instruments 


  1. Ayres, R. U., & Kneese, A. V. (1969). Production, consumption, and externalities. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 282–297.Google Scholar
  2. Baughan & Evale. (2004). The Green Dot System: Promoting Recycling in the European Union. World Tarde executive, Inc. Keller and Heckman LLP.Google Scholar
  3. Boulding, K. E. (1993). Spaceship earth revisited. Valuing the Earth: economics, ecology, and ethics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, (pp. 311–313).Google Scholar
  4. Coase, R. H. (2013). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 56(4), 837–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dey, A. B., et al. (2012) Radiation accident at Mayapuri scrap market, Delhi, 2010. Radiation protection dosimetry: ncs162.Google Scholar
  6. Greyson, J. (2007). Systemic economic instruments for energy security and global security. In NATO Science Programme Advanced Research Workshop on Modelling of Sustainable Consumption of Energy and Environmental Costing. Naples. Italy. Retrieved from:
  7. Higashida, K., & Jinji, N. (2006). Strategic use of recycled content standards under international duopoly. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51(2), 242–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoornweg, D., & Thomas, L. (1999). What a waste: solid waste management in Asia. The World Bank.
  9. Karpagam, M. (1999). Environmental economics: A textbook. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Kinnaman, T. C., & Fullterton, D. (1999). The economics of residential solid waste management (No. w7326). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  11. Munro, B. (2014). The economics of waste management. In Extended producer responsibility and its application in British Columbia. University of Victoria.Google Scholar
  12. Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., & Pennington, D. W. (2004). Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International30(5), 701–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sharma, R., et al. (2012) Composting of municipal solid waste for carbon credits-A case study from India. Waste Management, 2.Google Scholar
  14. Visvanathan & Norbu. (2006). Reduce, reuse and recycle: The 3 Rs in South Asia. Key Note Lecture, In 3 R Waste Management South Asia Expert Workshop, Katmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
  15. Visvanathan, C., Adhikari, R., & Ananth, A. P. (2007, November). 3 R practices for municipal solid waste management in Asia. In Kalmar ECOTECH 07 and Symposium on Environmental Chemistry (pp. 26–28).Google Scholar
  16. Wilson, D. C., Velis, C., & Cheeseman, C. (2006). Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat international, 30(4), 797–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IIT BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesIIT BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations