Ownership Classification and Technical Efficiency in Indian Manufacturing Firms: A Stochastic Frontier Approach

  • Sanjeev KumarEmail author
  • K. S. Ranjani


The study is proposed to explore the divergence in the technical efficiencies of the group-affiliated and standalone Indian manufacturing firms using Battesse and Coelli (1992). Group-affiliated firms have been claimed to have easier access to finance by various studies in comparison with standalone firms. Standalone firms generally find difficulties in arranging financing sources, whereas group firms can access finance from the profitable group firms at a lesser cost of capital than persisting market rates. Standalone firms need to be more efficient and profitable to accumulate internal earnings to accept available positive NPV (net present value) projects. The study will be conducted using linear logarithm form of Cobb–Douglas production function, where the value added in the particular financial year will be used as the dependent variable, while independent variables will be capital stock and a number of employees working in the firm at time t. The efficiency of the firms will be captured by the non-negative term (−u) constituted in the error term of the stochastic frontier equation. The study will be conducted for the period 2010–2016 using various data sources that include prowess database from the centre for monitoring Indian economy, Reserve Bank of India and annual survey of industries. The study will help to understand the efficiency patterns of Indian manufacturing over the years and will also explore whether the situation of credit constraints will motivate firms to be more efficient than their competitors. The main motivation for the study is derived credit constraints that are faced by the firms by virtue of not belonging to a business group.


Technical efficiency Ownership structure Stochastic frontier analysis India Manufacturing firms 


  1. Agung, J. (2000). Financial constraint, firms’ investments and the channels of monetary policy in Indonesia. Applied Economics, 32(13), 1637–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2004). The cash flow sensitivity of cash. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1777–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1–2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belotti, F., Daidone, S., Ilardi, G., & Atella, V. (2012). Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata.Google Scholar
  6. Bhandari, A. K., & Ray, S. C. (2012). Technical efficiency in the Indian textiles industry: A non-parametric analysis of firm-level data. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(1), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabral, L., & Mata, J. (2003). On the evolution of the firm size distribution: Facts and theory. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1075–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campa, J. M., & Shaver, J. M. (2002). Exporting and capital investment: On the strategic behavior of exporters. IESE research papers, 469.Google Scholar
  9. Chirinko, R. S., & Schaller, H. (1995). Why does liquidity matter in investment equations? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(2), 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleary, S. (1999). The relationship between firm investment and financial status. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  12. Črnigoj, M., & Verbič, M. (2014). Financial constraints and corporate investments during the current financial and economic crisis: The credit crunch and investment decisions of Slovenian firms. Economic systems, 38(4), 502–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denis, D. J., & Sibilkov, V. (2009). Financial constraints, investment, and the value of cash holdings. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devereux, M., & Schiantarelli, F. (1990). Investment, financial factors, and cash flow: Evidence from UK panel data. In Asymmetric information, corporate finance, and investment (pp. 279–306). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., Petersen, B. C., Blinder, A. S., & Poterba, J. M. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1988(1), 141–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (1993). Working capital and fixed investment: New evidence on financing constraints. The RAND Journal of Economics, 328–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilchrist, S., & Himmelberg, C. P. (1995). Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of monetary Economics, 36(3), 541–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., &Scharfstein, D. (1991). Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese industrial groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kadapakkam, P. R., Kumar, P. C., & Riddick, L. A. (1998). The impact of cash flows and firm size on investment: The international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(3), 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lamont, O., Polk, C., & Saaá-Requejo, J. (2001). Financial constraints and stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lensink, R., Van der Molen, R., & Gangopadhyay, S. (2003). Business groups, financing constraints and investment: The case of India. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lundvall, K., & Battese, G. E. (2000). Firm size, age and efficiency: evidence from Kenyan manufacturing firms. The Journal of Development Studies, 36(3), 146–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maietta, O. W., & Sena, V. (2010). Financial constraints and technical efficiency: Some empirical evidence for Italian producers’ cooperatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitra, A., Varoudakis, A., & Veganzones-Varoudakis, M. A. (2002). Productivity and technical efficiency in Indian states’ manufacturing: The role of infrastructure. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(2), 395–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramaswamy, K. V. (1994). Small-scale manufacturing industries: Some aspects of size, growth and structure. Economic and Political Weekly, M13–M23.Google Scholar
  26. Sena, V. (2006). The determinants of firms’ performance: Can finance constraints improve technical efficiency? European Journal of Operational Research, 172(1), 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stucki, T. (2013). Success of start-up firms: The role of financial constraints. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 25–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tybout, J. R. (2000). Manufacturing firms in developing countries: How well do they do, and why? Journal of Economic literature, 38(1), 11–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE)MumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Accounting and FinanceNational Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE)MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations