Advertisement

Federalism in India: An Economic Analysis

  • Sripriya SrivatsaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The outcomes of federalism have played out in very different manners in various societies that have chosen to adopt this design of organising themselves. The Indian context is particularly interesting because of how Indian states have formed, evolved or have carved out of one another into existence. In this paper, I explore whether smaller states could perform better on governance outcomes. The measure of governance is legislative activity in Indian state parliaments. The results indicate that as states become smaller units to govern, the legislative in activity in their respective parliaments does increase.

References

  1. Baruah, S. (2003). Confronting constructionism: Ending India’s naga war. Journal of Peace Research, 40(3), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dhar, I. (2001). Assam through the prism of reorganisation experience, Chapter 11 (pp. 282–300). Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Hayek, F. A. (1948). The economic conditions of interstate federalism. Individualism and economic order (Vol. 255, pp. 268–269).Google Scholar
  4. Kumar, A. (2011a). Politics of autonomy Punjab and Jammu Kashmir, Chapter 9 (pp. 275–300). Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Kumar, D. (2011b). A study of Chhattisgarh, Chapter 2 (pp. 76–106). Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Mawdsley, E. (1997). Nonsecessionist regionalism in India: The Uttarakhand separate state movement. Environment and Planning A, 29, 2217–2235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mawdsley, E. (2002). Redrawing the body politic: Federalism, regionalism and the creation of new states in India. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 40(3), 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Singh, A., & Pani, N. (2012). Territories beyond geography: An alternative approach to the demands for new states in India. Common Wealth and Comparative Politics, 50(1), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Parikh, S., & Weingast, B. R. (1997). A comparative theory of federalism: India. Virginia Law Review, 83(7), 1593–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prakash, A. (2011). The case of tribals in Jharkhand, Chapter 1. Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Sarangi, A. (2011). Interrogating reorganisation of states, Chapter 1 (pp. 29–45, pp. 912–915, 2011). Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Sharma, P. K. (1967). Integration of princely states and the reorganisation of states in India. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 236–241.Google Scholar
  13. Srinivasulu, K. (2011). Interrogating reorganisation of states, Chapter 7 (pp. 164–189, 2011). Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Thakkar, U., & Sanghavi, N. (2011). Political currents in Maharashtra: Language beyond, Chapter 6 (Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
  15. Weingast, B. R. (2007). Second generation fiscal federalism: Implications for decentralized democratic governance and economic development. Commissioned by ARD, Inc., Sept 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: Implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Candidate for Master of Science, Political Economy of DevelopmentSchool of Oriental and African Studies, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations