Skip to main content

Rational Development of Furoindolizine Core Skeleton Guided by Oscillator Strength

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systematic Exploration of Indolizine-Based Small Fluorescent Molecules

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

Molar absorptivity (ε) is an intrinsic property of every chemical entity, and it represents how well the entity absorbs light at any given wavelength [1]. From a synthetic point of view, the development of a new design strategy that allows for the predictable enhancement of the molar absorptivity of a species is highly valuable—with benefits spanning from aiding in the development of light-harvesting materials, such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC), to various types of fluorescent materials [2]. However, very few papers have reported the successful improvement of molar absorptivity of particular initial compounds [3] because the prime strategy, an extension of the π-conjugated systems of these compounds, does not always guarantee increased molar absorptivity, and some instances have even been shown to have negligible or opposite effects [4]. To the best of my knowledge, there was no scientific report pursuing the rational design of organic fluorophores with enhanced molar absorptivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1346–1350.

  2. 2.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12370–12371.

  3. 3.

    Chem. Comm. 2003, 17, 2146–2147.

  4. 4.

    ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1284–1289.

  5. 5.

    Helv. Chim. Acta 2010, 93, 587–594.

References

  1. (a) Valeur B (2001) Molecular fluorescence: principles and applications, Wiley-VCH Weinheim, pp 24–27. (b) Parson WW (2007) Modern optical spectroscopy: with examples from biophysics and biochemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, p 3, p 91, p 126

    Google Scholar 

  2. (a) Wang P, Klein C, Humphry-Baker R, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:808–809. (b) Gao F, Wang Y, Shi D, Zhang J, Wang M, Jing X, Humphry-Baker R, Wang P, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:10720–10728. (c) Chen H, Huang H, Huang X, Clifford JN, Forneli A, Palomares E, Zheng X, Zheng L, Wang X, Shen P, Zhao B, Tan S (2010) J Phys Chem C 114:3280–3286. (d) Jiang X, Karlsson KM, Gabrielsson E, Johansson EMJ, Quintana M, Karlsson M, Sun L, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A (2011) Adv Funct Mater 21:2944–2952

    Google Scholar 

  3. (a) Melinger JS, Pan Y, Kleiman VD, Peng Z, Davis BL, McMorrow D, Lu M (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:12002–12012. (b) Yu Q, Liu S, Zhang M, Cai N, Wang Y, Wang P (2009) J Phys Chem C 113:14559–14566. (c) Lin Y, Cheng P, Liu Y, Shi Q, Hu W, Li Y, Zhan X (2012) Org Elelctron 13:673–680

    Google Scholar 

  4. (a) Chen J, Burghart A, Derecskei-Kovacs A, Burgess K (2000) J Org Chem 65:2900–2906. (b) Zhao W, Carreira EM (2006) Chem Eur J 12:7254–7263. (c) Goeb S, Ziessel R (2007) Org Lett 9:737–740. (d) Karton-Lifshin N, Albertazzi L, Bendikov M, Baran PS, Shabat D (2012) J Am Chem Soc 134:20412–20420. (e) Nakanishi K, Fukatsu D, Takaishi K, Tsuji T, Uenaka K, Kuramochi K, Kawabata T, Tsubaki K (2014) J Am Chem Soc 136:7101 − 7109

    Google Scholar 

  5. (a) Kim E, Park SB (2009) Chem Asian J 4:1646–1658. (b) Kobayashi H, Ogawa M, Alford R, Choyke PL, Urano Y (2010) Chem Rev 110:2620–2640. (c) Yun S-W, Kang N-Y, Park S-J, Ha H-H, Kim YK, Lee J-S, Chang Y-T (2014) Acc Chem Res 47:1277–1286

    Google Scholar 

  6. (a) Lavis LD, Raines RT (2008) ACS Chem Biol 3:142–155. (b) Lavis LD, Raines RT (2014) ACS Chem Biol 9:855–866

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hilborn RC (1982) Am J Phys 50:982–986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. (a) Evans RC, Douglas P, Burrow HD (2013) Applied photochemistry, Springer-Verlag, p 60. (b) Ji S, Yang J, Yang Q, Liu S, Chen M, Zhao J (2009) J Org Chem 74:4855–4865. (c) Zhang X, Xiao Y, Qi J, Qu J, Kim B, Yue X, Belfield KD (2013) J Org Chem 78:9153–9160

    Google Scholar 

  9. (a) Sahu H, Panda AN (2013) Macromolecules 46:844–855. (b) Sand AM, Liu C, Valentine AJS, Mazziotti DA (2014) J Phys Chem A 118:6085–6091

    Google Scholar 

  10. (a) Kim E, Koh M, Ryu J, Park SB (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:12206–12207. (b) Kim E, Koh M, Lim BJ, Park SB (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133:6642–6649. (c) Lee Y, Na S, Lee S, Jeon NL, Park SB (2013) Mol Biosyst 9:952–956. (d) Choi EJ, Kim E, Lee Y, Jo A, Park SB (2014) Angew Chem 126: 1370–1374; Angew Chem Int Ed 53:1346–1350. (e) Kim E, Lee Y, Lee S, Park SB (2015) Acc Chem Res 48: 538–547

    Google Scholar 

  11. (a) Kim E, Lee S, Park SB (2012) Chem Commun 48:2331–2333. (b) Choi EJ, Park SB (2015) Org Biomol Chem 13:5202–5208

    Google Scholar 

  12. (a) Lim J-L, Chirayil S, Thummel RP (1991) J Org Chem 56:1492–1500. (b) Liang Y, Zhang P, Yang S, Tao Z (2013) J Chen (2013) Adv Energy Mater 3: 600–605. (c) Dang D, Xiao M, Zhou P, Zhong J, Fan J, Su N, Xiong W, Yang C, Wang Q, Wang Y, Pei Y, Yang R, Zhu W (2015) Eur J Org Chem 4:820–827. (d) Kato S-I, Furuya T, Nitani M, Hasebe N, Ie Y, Aso Y, Yoshihara T, Tobita S, Nakamura Y (2015) Chem Eur J 21:3115–3128. (e) Huang J-D, Chai S, Ma H, Dong B (2015) J Phys Chem C 119:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  13. (a) Umezawa K, Nakamura Y, Makino H, Citterio D, Suzuki K (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:1550–1551. (b) Umezawa K, Matsui A, Nakamura Y, Citterio D, Suzuki K (2009) Chem Eur J 15:1096–1106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Higashiguchi K, Matsuda K, Asano Y, Murakami A, Nakamura S, Irie M (2005) Eur J Org Chem 1:91–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. (a) Chartoire A, Comoy C, Fort Y (2008) Tetrahedron 64:10867–10873. (b) Jasselin-Hinschberger A, Comoy C, Chartoire A, Fort Y (2015) Eur J Org Chem 11:2321–2331

    Google Scholar 

  16. (a) Cai D, Marques MAL, Milne BF, Nogueira F (2010) J Phys Chem Lett 1:2781–2787. (b) Liu X, Xu Z, Cole JM (2013) J Phys Chem C 117:16584–16595

    Google Scholar 

  17. (a) Murata C, Masuda T, Kamochi Y, Todorki K, Yoshida H, Nohta H, Yamaguchi M, Takadate A (2005) Chem Pharm Bull 53:750–758. (b) Umezawa K, Nakamura Y, Makino H, Citterio D, Suzuki K (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:1550–1551. (c) Umezawa K, Matsui A, Nakamura Y, Citterio D, Suzuki K (2009) Chem Eur J 15:1096–1106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Experimental Section

Experimental Section

4.1.1 General Information

a. Basic characterization

1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on an Agilent 400-MR (Agilent Technologies) and Varian Inova-500 (Varian Associates), and chemical shifts were measured in ppm downfield from internal tetramethylsilane (TMS) standard. Multiplicity was indicated as follows: s (singlet); d (doublet); t (triplet); q (quartet); m (multiplet); dd (doublet of doublet); dt (doublet of triplet); br s (broad singlet), br d (broad doublet) etc. Coupling constants were reported in Hz. Low resolution mass spectrometry (LRMS) was obtained by LC/MS system, Finnigan MSQplus Surveyer (Thermo Scientific) or 6120 Quadrupole LC/MS (Agilent Technologies). High resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) of furoindolizine fluorescence compounds was further confirmed by Ultra High Resolution ESI Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker).

b. Absorption and fluorescence related properties

Absorption spectra and molar absorption coefficient at the absorption maxima of furoindolizine fluorescence compounds were measured by UV-VIS spectrophotometer UV-1650PC (Shimatzu, Japan). Emission spectra was measured by Cary Eclipse Fluorescence spectrophotometer (Varian Associates) and absolute quantum yield was measured by QE-2000 (Otsuka Electronics).

c. Chemical and bio reagents

3-Bromopropylamine hydrobromide, di-tert-butyl dicarbonate, propargyl amine, triethylamine (TEA), bromoacetyl bromide, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), copper(I) iodide (CuI), furo[3,2-b]pyridine, 2-phenylfuro[3,2-b]pyridine, iodobenzene, 4-iodobenzonitrile, 4-iodoanisole, 4-bromophenyl methyl sulfone, palladium acetate (PdOAc), bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (PdCl2(PPh3)2), silver acetate (AgOAc), potassium acetate (KOAc), tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) solution, silver trifluoromethanesulfonate, and all terminal alkyne derivatives were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd or Acros, and used without further purification. The progress of reaction was monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) (silica gel 60, F254 0.25 mm), and components were visualized by observation under UV light (254 and 365 nm) or by treating the TLC plates with anisaldehyde, KMnO4, and ninhydrin followed by heating. Solvents were purchased from commercial venders and used without further purification. Cell culture reagents including fatal bovine serum, culture media, and antibiotic-antimycotic solution were purchased from GIBCO. MitoTracker Red CMXRos was purchased from Molecular Probes. The culture dish and glass-bottom dish were purchased from CORNING.

d. Quantum mechanical calculations

All quantum mechanical calculations were performed in Gaussin09 W. The ground state structures of furoindolizine compounds, Seoul-Fluor derivatives, and benzocoumarin derivatives were optimized using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6-31G* level. The oscillator strength values were calculated through time dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) with the optimized structures of the ground state. The Energy gap between the S0–S1 states of furoindolizine analogues were calculated based on the optimized structure of the first-excited state to compare with experimental emission properties. Calculation for BODIPY derivatives were performed in the Materials Studio® 4.2 program (Accelrys Software, Inc.) at the GAA/PBE/DNP level in DMol3 to reduce the calculation cost.

e. Fluorescence microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy studies were carried with DeltaVision Elite imaging system (GE Healthcare) equipped with a sCMOS camera. Objective lenses are supported by Olympus IX-71 (Olympus) inverted microscope equipped with Plan APO 60X/Oil (PLAPON60 × O), 1.42 NA, WD 0.15 mm. DeltaVision Elite uses a solid state illumination system, InSightSSI fluorescence illumination module. Four-color standard filter set (GE Healthcare, 52-852113-003) was used to detect fluorescence signals.

4.1.2 Experimental Procedure for Live Cell Fluorescence Image

1. Cell culture

HeLa cell line (human cervical carcinoma cells) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). HeLa cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (GIBCO) supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, GIBCO) and 1% (v/v) antibiotic-antimycotic agent (GIBCO). HeLa cell line was maintained in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37 °C, and cultured in 100 mm cell culture dish (CORNING).

2. Mitochondria staining experiment with Mito-18 and MitoTracker Red

HeLa cells were seeded on cover glass bottom dish and incubated at 5% CO2, 37 °C for overnight. Cells are treated with 20 µM Mito-18 in media for 1 h. After 1 h, 20 nM MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Life Technologies) was added to cells, and incubate for 30 min. After the treatment, dyes were washed with PBS buffer for 3 times and then fluorescence images were taken by fluorescence microscopy under PBS buffer with DeltaVision Elite imaging system (GE Healthcare) equipped with 60X/1.42 NA oil lens. Fluorescence signal of each probes were obtained using FITC filter (Mito-18, Ex; 475 nm with 28 nm bandwidth, Em; 525 nm with 48 nm bandwidth) and Cy5 filter (MitoTracker Red CMXRox, Ex; 632 nm with 22 nm bandwidth, Em; 670 nm with 34 nm bandwidth).

Absorption and emission spectra of all furoindolizine compounds

  • Horizontal axis: wavelength (nm)

  • Vertical axis: normalized intensity (a.u.)

figure a
figure b

4.1.3 Computational Results of Furoindolizine Analogues

# cpd

Electronic transition

Energy (eV)

f (oscillator strength)

01

S0 → S1

3.7316 eV 332.26 nm

f = 0.2348

S0 → S2

4.1879 eV 296.06 nm

f = 0.0420

S0 → S3

4.7567 eV 260.65 nm

f = 0.0001

02

S0 → S1

3.3275 eV 372.60 nm

f = 0.5467

S0 → S2

3.7156 eV 333.68 nm

f = 0.0712

S0 → S3

4.0517 eV 306.00 nm

f = 0.0142

03

S0 → S1

3.4905 eV 355.21 nm

f = 0.3259

S0 → S2

4.0271 eV 307.87 nm

f = 0.0706

S0 → S3

4.2297 eV 293.13 nm

f = 0.1535

04

S0 → S1

3.2084 eV 386.44 nm

f = 0.2737

S0 → S2

3.8527 eV 321.81 nm

f = 0.0593

S0 → S3

4.0629 eV 305.16 nm

f = 0.0159

05

S0 → S1

2.9199 eV 424.62 nm

f = 0.6262

S0 → S2

3.8066 eV 325.71 nm

f = 0.1642

S0 → S3

4.0519 eV 305.99 nm

f = 0.0621

06

S0 → S1

2.8076 eV 441.61 nm

f = 0.9179

S0 → S2

3.4494 eV 359.43 nm

f = 0.2282

S0 → S3

3.7989 eV 326.37 nm

f = 0.0862

07

S0 → S1

2.7515 eV 450.61 nm

f = 0.7117

S0 → S2

3.7433 eV 331.21 nm

f = 0.1957

S0 → S3

3.8626 eV 320.99 nm

f = 0.1392

08

S0 → S1

2.4405 eV 508.02 nm

f = 0.5137

S0 → S2

3.2408 eV 382.57 nm

f = 0.3306

S0 → S3

3.5917 eV 345.20 nm

f = 0.1929

09

S0 → S1

3.2300 eV 383.85 nm

f = 0.5929

S0 → S2

3.9430 eV 314.44 nm

f = 0.0602

S0 → S3

4.3047 eV 288.02 nm

f = 0.0179

10

S0 → S1

3.0152 eV 411.20 nm

f = 0.9641

S0 → S2

3.4429 eV 360.11 nm

f = 0.0539

S0 → S3

3.8750 eV 319.96 nm

f = 0.0503

11

S0 → S1

3.0455 eV 407.11 nm

f = 0.6955

S0 → S2

3.8669 eV 320.63 nm

f = 0.0636

S0 → S3

3.9850 eV 311.12 nm

f = 0.2064

12

S0 → S1

2.8039 eV 442.18 nm

f = 0.5454

S0 → S2

3.6142 eV 343.05 nm

f = 0.2764

S0 → S3

3.7556 eV 330.13 nm

f = 0.0947

13

S0 → S1

3.1553 eV 392.94 nm

f = 0.9299

S0 → S2

3.7940 eV 326.79 nm

f = 0.0179

S0 → S3

4.0536 eV 305.86 nm

f = 0.0444

14

S0 → S1

2.8613 eV 433.32 nm

f = 1.1950

S0 → S2

3.2935 eV 376.45 nm

f = 0.1272

S0 → S3

3.6195 eV 342.55 nm

f = 0.0098

15

S0 → S1

3.0058 eV 412.48 nm

f = 1.0864

S0 → S2

3.6786 eV 337.04 nm

f = 0.0622

S0 → S3

3.8175 eV 324.78 nm

f = 0.1140

16

S0 → S1

2.8657 eV 432.65 nm

f = 0.8915

S0 → S2

3.5335 eV 350.89 nm

f = 0.3607

S0 → S3

3.7179 eV 333.48 nm

f = 0.0784

17

S0 → S1

3.1616 eV 392.15 nm

f = 0.9272

S0 → S2

3.8097 eV 325.44 nm

f = 0.0533

S0 → S3

4.0779 eV 304.04 nm

f = 0.0608

18

S0 → S1

2.8862 eV 429.58 nm

f = 0.8972

S0 → S2

3.6101 eV 343.43 nm

f = 0.2309

S0 → S3

3.8490 eV 322.12 nm

f = 0.0618

19

S0 → S1

2.6442 eV 468.90 nm

f = 0.6753

S0 → S2

3.5330 eV 350.93 nm

f = 0.0000

S0 → S3

3.6495 eV 339.73 nm

f = 0.2998

4.1.4 Prediction of Photophysical Properties for 17, 18 and 19

1. From Fig. 4.6

The equation for ɛ estimation = 30382f + 5221.8

(f: calculated oscillator strength values)

2. From Fig. 4.9c

The equation for λem estimation = 1092.9x + 73.263,

(x: calculated 1/eV)

 

f (calculated oscillator strength values for S0 → S1)

Estimated ɛ

x (calculated 1/eV)

Estimated λem

17

0.9272

33,392

0.357935

464 nm

18

0.8972

32,480

0.406835

518 nm

19

0.6753

25,738

0.456496

572 nm

4.1.5 Synthetic Procedure and Compound Characterization

Preparation of tert-butyl (3-(prop-2-yn-1-ylamino)propyl)carbamate was conducted through the previous synthetic report.Footnote 1

Preparation of tert -butyl (3-(2-bromo- N -(prop-2-yn-1-yl)acetamido)propyl)carbamate

To a stirred solution of bromoacetyl bromide (2.0 equiv.) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (0.1 M) at –78 °C under argon, added dropwise a tert-butyl (3-(prop-2-yn-1-ylamino)propyl)carbamate (1 equiv.) and 3 equiv. of triethylamine (TEA) in CH2Cl2 (0.1 M) over a period of 1 h. The solution was stirred at −78 °C for 2 h. When the reaction was completed checked by TLC, saturated NaHCO3(aq) was added to the solution and the organic material was extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4(s), and concentrated in vacuo after filtration. The residue was purified by silica-gel flash column chromatography to afford the desired product. (Transparent oil, Y: 83%).

tert -Butyl (3-(2-bromo- N -(prop-2-yn-1-yl)acetamido)propyl)carbamate

figure c

1H NMR (2:1 rotamer ratio, asterisks denote minor rotamer peaks, 400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.23 (br s, 1H), 4.76* (br s, 1H), 4.23* (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H), 4.14 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 3.89* (s, 2H), 3.56–3.52 (m, 2H), 3.56–3.52* (m, 2H), 3.23–3.18* (m, 2H), 3.13–3.09 (m, 2H), 2.38 (br s, 1H), 2.26* (br s, 1H), 1.94–1.88* (m, 2H), 1.79–1.73 (m, 2H), 1.45* (s, 9H), 1.44 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.5, 166.4*, 156.2, 79.1, 78.2*, 78.0, 73.7, 72.6*, 45.9*, 44.2, 38.2, 38.0*, 37.1, 34.9*, 29.3*, 28.5, 28.5*, 27.6, 26.1, 25.9*; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C13H22BrN2O3 [M + H]+: 333.08; Found: 332.92.

General procedure for preparation of furopyridine derivatives

(a) Terminal alkyne derivatives required to prepare various furopyridine derivatives were commercially available, except 1-(4-ethynylphenyl)ethanone and 4-(4-ethynylphenyl) morpholine, which were synthesized by reported procedure.Footnote 2, Footnote 3

(b) Preparation of 2-bromopyridin-3-yl acetate was conducted refer to the reported synthetic procedure.Footnote 4

figure d

To a suspension of 2-bromopyridin-3-yl acetate (1.0 equiv.), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (3 mol%), and CuI (6 mol%) in THF (0.1 M), in the presence of TEA (15.0 equiv.), was added a terminal alkyne derivative (2.0 equiv.) under argon atmosphere with vigorous stirring at 50 °C. After the reaction was completed checked by TLC, the resulting solution was filtered through Celite and concentrated in vacuo. After that, to the solution of filtered residue in MeOH (0.1 M), were added potassium carbonate (3.0 equiv.) and silver triflate (10 mol%) with stirring at room temperature. When the reaction was completed checked by TLC, brine was added to the solution and the organic material was extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4(s), and concentrated under reduced pressure after filtration. The residue was purified by silica-gel flash column chromatography to afford the desired furopyridine derivatives.

4-(Furo[3,2- b ]pyridin-2-yl)benzonitrile

figure e

Yield: 45%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.59 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (s, 1H), 7.28 (dd, J = 4.4, 8.4 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.1, 148.6, 148.4, 146.9, 133.8, 132.8, 125.7, 120.0, 118.6, 118.4. 112.7, 105.4; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C14H9N2O [M + H]+: 221.07; Found: 220.88.

4-(Furo[3,2-b]pyridin-2-yl)-N,N-dimethylaniline

figure f

Yield: 77%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.46 (br s, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (dd, J = 4.6, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (s, 1H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.00 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.0, 151.2, 150.0, 147.7, 145.6, 126.7, 117.7, 117.5, 117.0, 112.0, 99.0, 40.3; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C15H15N2O [M + H]+: 239.12; Found: 238.98.

2-(4-Morpholinophenyl)furo[3,2- b ]pyridine

figure g

Yield: 63%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.48 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (dd, J = 4.6, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 4H), 3.27 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.2, 152.1, 149.7, 147.9, 145.9, 126.7, 121.0, 118.2, 117.4, 115.1. 100.4, 66.8, 48.5; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C17H17N2O2 [M + H]+: 281.13; Found: 281.03.

1-(4-(Furo[3,2- b ]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)ethanone

figure h

Yield: 54%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.57 (br s, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.98 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (s, 1H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 1H), 2.65 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.3, 158.2, 148.6, 148.5, 146.5, 137.4, 133.8, 129.1, 125.4, 119.6, 118.3, 104.6, 26.8; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C15H12NO2 [M + H]+: 238.09; Found: 238.1.

2-(Triisopropylsilyl)furo[3,2- b ]pyridine

figure i

Yield: 90%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 8.52 (dd, J = 1.3, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (dd, J = 4.5, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 1.50–1.44 (m, 3H), 1.22–1.13 (m, 18H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 166.0, 151.3, 149.0, 146.7, 120.4, 119.8, 118.4, 18.9, 11.7; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C16H26NOSi [M + H]+: 276.18; Found: 276.2.

General procedure for preparation of furoindolizine-based core skeletons

figure j

To a solution of tert-butyl (3-(2-bromo-N-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)acetamido)propyl)carbamate (1.2 equiv.) in acetonitrile (0.1 M), was added a furopyridine derivative (1.0 equiv.), and the solution was stirred at 80 °C overnight. After the complete consumption of starting materials, copper iodide (1.0 equiv.) was added to a reaction mixture followed by slow addition of 1,8-diazabicycloundec-7-ene (DBU) (3.0 equiv.) at room temperature with vigorous stirring. When the reaction was completed checked by TLC, the resulting mixture was filtered through the short bed of silica gel and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica-gel flash column chromatography to afford the desired furoindolizine-based core skeltons. Some furopyridine derivatives used different metal sources instead of copper iodide; AgOTf was used in the case of R2 = 4-(acetyl)Ph group, and Ag2O was used in the case of R2 = 4-(NMe2)Ph and 4-(morpholino)Ph.

tert -Butyl (3-(9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (01)

figure k

Yield: 19%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.23 (m, 2H), 6.45 (s, 1H), 5.44 (br s, 1H), 4.35 (s, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.17 (q, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 1.86–1.79 (m, 2H), 1.44 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.2, 156.2, 143.3, 143.1, 138.4, 135.8, 125.7, 121.6, 114.3, 109.7, 104.8, 94.9, 79.0, 46.6, 40.1, 37.4, 28.9, 28.5; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C20H23N3NaO4 [M + Na]+: 392.1581; Found: 392.1581.

tert -Butyl (3-(2-(4-cyanophenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (05)

figure l

Yield: 49%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.19 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.51 (s, 1H), 5.36 (br s, 1H), 4.40 (s, 2H), 3.68 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.21 (br d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 1.87–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.1, 156.2, 151.8, 143.9, 138.3, 136.1, 133.9, 132.7, 127.1, 124.7, 122.3, 118.9, 115.9, 111.3, 109.2, 102.1, 95.9, 79.2, 46.8, 40.3, 37.6, 29.1, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C27H26N4NaO4 [M + Na]+: 493.1846; Found: 493.1847.

tert -Butyl (3-(9-oxo-2-phenyl-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (09)

figure m

Yield: 35%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.31 (m, 3H), 6.51 (s, 1H), 5.50 (br s, 1H), 4.37 (s, 2H), 3.65 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.13 (q, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 1.83–1.76 (m, 2H), 1.44 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.3, 156.3, 154.4, 142.9, 138.6, 136.0, 130.1, 128.9, 128.6, 127.5, 124.7, 121.6, 114.1, 109.4, 99.4, 95.1, 79.1, 46.7, 40.3, 37.6, 29.0, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C26H27N3NaO4 [M + Na]+: 468.1894; Found: 468.1893.

tert -Butyl (3-(2-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (13)

figure n

Yield: 26%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87 (s, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.42 (s, 1H), 5.40 (br s, 1H), 4.36 (s, 2H), 3.67 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.19 (br d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.03 (s, 6H), 1.85–1.82 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.4, 156.3, 155.8, 150.7, 142.0, 138.9, 136.1, 128.1, 126.1, 121.1, 118.3, 112.5, 112.2, 109.4, 96.4, 94.5, 79.1, 46.7, 40.4, 40.3, 37.5, 29.1, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C28H32N4NaO4 [M + Na]+: 511.2316; Found: 511.2317.

tert -Butyl (3-(2-(4-morpholinophenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (17)

figure o

Yield: 22%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.21 (m, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 5.38 (br s, 1H), 4.37 (s, 2H), 3.89 (t, J = 4.6 Hz, 4H), 3.67 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.25 (t, J = 4.6 Hz, 4H), 3.20 (q, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 1.87–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.4, 156.3, 155.0, 151.4, 142.4, 138.8, 136.1, 127.9, 126.0, 121.6, 121.3, 115.3, 113.2, 109.4, 97.5, 94.7, 79.1, 66.9, 48.7, 46.7, 40.3, 37.6, 29.1, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C30H34N4NaO5 [M + Na]+: 553.2421; Found: 553.2421.

tert -Butyl (3-(2-(4-acetylphenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate

figure p

Yield: 29%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.42 (s, 1H), 5.41 (br s, 1H), 4.33 (s, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.21 (br d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 2.59 (s, 3H), 1.87–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.2, 162.0, 156.2, 152.7, 143.5, 138.3, 136.1, 135.9, 133.9, 128.9, 127.1, 124.2, 121.9, 115.2, 109.1, 101.3, 95.6, 79.2, 46.7, 40.3, 37.6, 29.0, 28.5, 26.6; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C28H30N3O5 [M + H]+: 488.22; Found: 488.2.

tert -Butyl (3-(9-oxo-2-(triisopropylsilyl)-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate

figure q

Yield: 70%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.29–7.23 (m, 2H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 5.31 (br s, 1H), 4.35 (s, 2H), 3.67 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.19 (q, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 1.88–1.83 (m, 2H), 1.48–1.40 (m, 12H), 1.17–1.15 (m, 18H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.3, 160.0, 156.3, 146.9, 138.6, 135.7, 126.4, 121.8, 115.2, 114.1, 110.0, 94.8, 79.1, 46.6, 40.3, 37.7, 29.0, 28.5, 18.7, 11.2; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C29H44N3O4Si [M + H]+: 526.31; Found: 526.3.

Procedure for preparation of R 1 group embedded furoindolizine compounds (Pd coupling reaction)

figure r

Preparation of N,N-diethyl-4-iodoaniline was conducted through the reported procedure.Footnote 5

For general iodo-aryl moieties

Condition A. To a solution of a furoindolizine-based core skeleton in dimethylformamide (0.1 M), were added a iodo-aryl derivative (2.0 equiv.), bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (PdCl2(PPh3)2, 10 mol%), silver acetate (1.5 equiv.), and potassium acetate (3.0 equiv.), and the solution was stirred at 100 °C overnight. When the reaction was completed checked by TLC, the reaction mixture was filtered through the short bed of silica gel and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica-gel flash column chromatography to afford the desired products. (** at isolated yield indicates 10 mol% of PdCl2(PPh3)2 was applied additionally to completely convert the starting materials)

For N,N-diethyl-4-iodoaniline and 1-iodo-4-methoxybenzene

Condition B. To a solution of a furoindolizine-based core skeleton in dimethylformamide (0.1 M), were added a iodo-aryl derivative (2.0 equiv.), palladium acetate (20 mol%), and potassium acetate (3.0 equiv.), and the solution was stirred at 80 °C overnight. When the reaction was completed checked by TLC, the reaction mixture was filtered through the short bed of silica gel and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica-gel flash column chromatography to afford the desired products.

tert -Butyl (3-(2,6-bis(4-cyanophenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (06)

figure s

Yield: 80%**; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.29 (s, 1H), 7.96 (d, 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.76–7.65 (m, 7H), 7.43 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (br s, 1H), 4.57 (s, 2H), 3.73 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.23–3.20 (m, 2H), 1.91–1.88 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.7, 156.2, 152.8, 144.2, 139.3, 135.1, 134.9, 133.6, 133.1, 132.8, 127.7, 127.6, 125.0, 122.8, 119.1, 118.7, 114.3, 111.9, 111.0, 109.6, 109.4, 102.1, 79.4, 47.0, 40.6, 37.7, 29.1, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C34H29N5NaO4 [M + Na]+: 594.2112; Found: 594.2111.

tert -Butyl (3-(2-(4-cyanophenyl)-9-oxo-6-phenyl-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (07)

figure t

Yield: 61%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.24 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.50–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 2H), 5.33 (br s, 1H), 4.53 (s, 2H), 3.71 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.21 (br d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 1.88–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.0, 156.2, 152.1, 144.2, 134.8, 134.4, 134.3, 133.8, 132.7, 129.3, 127.6, 127.3, 126.6, 124.8, 122.0, 118.9, 115.1, 111.5, 111.4, 109.7, 102.2, 79.3, 47.0, 40.5, 37.6, 29.1, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C33H30N4NaO4 [M + Na]+: 569.2159; Found: 569.2160.

tert -Butyl (3-(2-(4-cyanophenyl)-6-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (08)

figure u

Yield: 27%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.20 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.37 (br s, 1H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 3.70 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.42 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 3.20 (br d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 1.87–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.2, 156.3, 151.7, 146.6, 144.2, 134.4, 134.0, 133.7, 132.7, 128.7, 127.2, 124.7, 121.6, 121.0, 119.0, 115.6, 112.3, 112.2, 111.2, 108.7, 102.3, 79.3, 47.0, 44.6, 40.5, 37.6, 29.1, 28.6, 12.8; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C37H40N5O4 [M + H]+: 618.3075; Found: 618.3077.

tert -Butyl (3-(6-(4-cyanophenyl)-9-oxo-2-phenyl-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (10)

figure v

Yield: 81%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06 (s, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.61–7.55 (m, 3H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.34 (m, 2H), 5.30 (br s, 1H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 3.70 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.22 (br d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 1.90–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.7, 156.2, 155.3, 143.1, 139.6, 135.3, 134.8, 132.9, 129.6, 129.1, 129.0, 128.0, 127.2, 124.8, 122.2, 119.3, 112.5, 111.1, 108.8, 108.6, 99.3, 79.3, 47.0, 40.5, 37.7, 29.1, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C33H30N4NaO4 [M + Na]+: 569.2159; Found: 569.2158.

tert -Butyl (3-(9-oxo-2,6-diphenyl-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (11)

figure w

Yield: 67%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.13 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.49–7.43 (m, 4H), 7.37–7.28 (m, 3H), 5.37 (br s, 1H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 3.69 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.21 (br d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 1.87–1.83 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.2, 156.3, 154.7, 143.1, 135.1, 134.7, 134.4, 130.0, 129.2, 129.0, 128.8, 127.7, 127.5, 126.3, 124.8, 121.4, 113.3, 110.7, 110.0, 99.5, 79.2, 46.9, 40.4, 37.6, 29.0, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C32H31N3NaO4 [M + Na]+: 544.2207; Found: 544.2207.

tert -Butyl (3-(6-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-9-oxo-2-phenyl-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (12)

figure x

Yield: 30%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.41(m, 4H), 7.36–7.32 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.25 (m, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.42 (br s, 1H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 3.69 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.41 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 3.20 (br d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 1.86–1.83 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.4, 156.3, 154.3, 146.4, 143.2, 134.7, 133.7, 130.2, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 127.6, 124.7, 121.4, 120.9, 113.8, 112.4, 111.3, 109.1, 99.6, 79.2, 46.9, 44.6, 40.4, 37.6, 29.0, 28.6, 12.8; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C36H41N4O4 [M + H]+: 593.3122; Found: 593.3121.

tert -Butyl (3-(6-(4-cyanophenyl)-2-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (14)

figure y

Yield: 86%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 5.29 (br s, 1H), 4.53 (s, 2H), 3.71 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.21 (q, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 3.05 (s, 6H), 1.90–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.44 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.9, 157.0, 156.3, 151.0, 142.4, 140.0, 135.8, 135.0, 133.0, 128.9, 127.2, 126.4, 121.8, 119.4, 117.7, 112.2, 111.2, 110.8, 108.6, 108.0, 96.2, 79.3, 47.0, 40.5, 40.4, 37.7, 29.1, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C35H35N5NaO4 [M + Na]+: 612.2581; Found: 612.2581.

tert -Butyl (3-(2-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-9-oxo-6-phenyl-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (15)

figure z

Yield: 81%**; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.59–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.34–7.28 (m, 2H), 6.77 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 5.38 (br s, 1H), 4.52 (s, 2H), 3.70 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.21 (q, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.04 (s, 6H), 1.88–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.44 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.4, 156.3, 156.2, 150.8, 142.4, 135.5, 135.0, 134.5, 129.2, 128.5, 127.5, 126.2, 126.1, 120.9, 118.2, 112.2, 111.6, 110.1, 110.0, 96.4, 79.2, 46.9, 40.5, 40.4, 37.6, 29.0, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C34H37N4O4 [M + H]+: 565.2809; Found: 565.2807.

tert -Butyl (3-(2-(4-acetylphenyl)-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (19)

figure aa

Yield: 17%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 8.28 (s, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.01 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 5.45 (br s, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.69 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.16 (q, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 2.62 (s, 3H), 1.85–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.43 (s, 9H); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C35H35N3NaO6 [M + Na]+: 616.2418; Found: 616.2417.

tert -Butyl (3-(6-(4-cyanophenyl)-9-oxo-2-(triisopropylsilyl)-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate

figure ab

Yield: 78%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.17 (s, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.66–7.62 (m, 3H), 7.45 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (br s, 1H), 4.54 (s, 2H), 3.71 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.21 (br d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 1.90–1.87 (m, 2H), 1.50–1.42 (m, 12H), 1.17 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 18H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.8, 161.6, 156.2, 147.2, 139.9, 135.3, 134.5, 133.0, 127.4, 127.0, 122.4, 119.3, 115.1, 112.5, 111.8, 108.8, 108.5, 79.2, 46.9, 40.5, 37.8, 29.0, 28.5, 18.7, 11.2; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C36H47N4O4Si [M + H]+: 627.34; Found: 627.3.

tert -Butyl (3-(9-oxo-6-phenyl-2-(triisopropylsilyl)-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate

figure ac

Yield: 84%**; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.14 (s, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (br s, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 3.70 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.20 (q, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 1.88–1.85 (m, 2H), 1.49–1.42 (m, 12H), 1.17 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 18H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.2, 160.5, 156.3, 147.1, 135.0, 134.9, 134.1, 129.2, 127.5, 126.7, 126.2, 121.5, 115.2, 113.2, 110.6, 110.4, 79.1, 46.8, 40.4, 37.7, 29.0, 28.5, 18.8, 11.2; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C35H48N3O4Si [M + H]+: 602.34; Found: 602.3.

tert -Butyl (3-(6-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-9-oxo-2-(triisopropylsilyl)-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate

figure ad

Yield: 32%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 5.47 (br s, 1H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.40 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 3.14 (q, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 1.84–1.78 (m, 2H), 1.49–1.42 (m, 12H), 1.21–1.18 (m, 24H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 162.4, 160.1, 156.3, 147.4, 146.7, 134.6, 133.7, 128.7, 126.6, 121.8, 121.5, 115.5, 114.0, 112.6, 111.3, 109.7, 78.9, 47.0, 44.8, 40.5, 37.7, 29.1, 28.5, 18.8, 12.8. 11.5; LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C39H57N4O4Si [M + H]+: 673.41; Found: 673.4.

General procedure for TIPS deprotection reaction (For 02, 03, and 04)

To a stirred solution of TIPS protected furoindolizine-based core skeleton in THF (0.1 M) at –40 °C, was slowly added tetrabutylammonium fluoride solution (1.0 M in THF, 1.5 equiv.) which was cooled down to –10 °C. Stirred reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to 0 °C for 1 h. When the reaction was completed checked by TLC, brine was added to the solution and the organic material was extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4(s), and concentrated under reduced pressure after filtration. The residue was purified by silica-gel flash column chromatography to afford the desired product.

tert -Butyl (3-(6-(4-cyanophenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (02)

figure ae

Yield: 82%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 7.91 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 2H), 5.42 (br s, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.13 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.85–1.78 (m, 2H), 1.41 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 161.9, 156.2, 144.6, 143.8, 139.9, 135.4, 135.1, 133.2, 127.6, 126.5, 122.7, 119.5, 113.3, 111.6, 109.1, 108.9, 105.1, 79.1, 47.1, 40.5, 37.6, 29.1, 28.5; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C27H26N4NaO4 [M + Na]+: 493.1846; Found: 493.1845.

tert -Butyl (3-(9-oxo-6-phenyl-7 H -furo[3,2-e]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (03)

figure af

Yield: 99%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 7.89 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 2H), 5.50 (br s, 1H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.13 (q, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 1.83–1.76 (m, 2H), 1.42 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 162.2, 156.2, 144.0, 143.7, 135.1, 135.0, 134.6, 129.4, 127.7, 126.4, 126.2, 121.8, 113.8, 110.7, 110.5, 105.1, 79.0, 47.0, 40.4, 37.6, 29.1, 28.5; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C26H27N3NaO4 [M + Na]+: 468.1894; Found: 468.1896.

tert -Butyl (3-(6-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (04)

figure ag

Yield: 99%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 7.90–7.88 (m, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.14 (br s, 1H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.43 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 3.15 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 1.90–1.83 (m, 2H), 1.40 (s, 9H), 1.18 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 162.2, 156.6, 147.2, 144.7, 144.0, 134.7, 134.6, 129.2, 126.2, 122.1, 122.0, 114.9, 113.1, 112.1, 109.8, 105.3, 78.5, 47.2, 44.9, 40.9, 38.3, 29.3, 28.6, 13.0; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C30H37N4O4 [M + H]+: 517.2809; Found: 517.2809.

Procedure for preparation of 18

To a solution of 01 (1.0 equiv.) in dimethylformamide (0.1 M), were added 4-bromophenyl methyl sulfone (10.0 equiv.), bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (20 mol%), silver acetate (1.5 equiv.) and potassium acetate (3.0 equiv.), and the solution was stirred at 100 °C. When the reaction was completed checked by TLC, the reaction mixture was filtered through the short bed of silica gel and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica-gel flash column chromatography to afford 18.

tert -Butyl (3-(2,6-bis(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-9-oxo-7 H -furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (18)

figure ah

Yield: 26%; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (s, 1H), 8.05–7.99 (m, 6H), 7.75–7.70 (m, 3H), 7.43 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (br s, 1H), 4.57 (s, 2H), 3.73 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.23–3.18 (m, 2H), 3.13 (s, 3H), 3.11 (s, 3H), 1.92–1.89 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.7, 156.2, 152.7, 144.2, 140.3, 140.0, 137.7, 135.2, 135.0, 134.6, 128.5, 128.2, 127.7, 127.6, 125.2, 122.8, 114.3, 111.0, 109.4, 102.2, 79.4, 47.0, 44.8, 44.7, 40.6, 37.7, 29.1, 28.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C34H35N3NaO8S2 [M + Na]+: 700.1758; Found: 700.1759.

Procedure for preparation of Mito-18

figure ai

To a solution of compound 18 in DCM (0.1 M) was added a 10% v/v of hydrochloric acid (HCl), and the solution was stirred overnight at room temperature. After full consumption of starting material, the solution was diluted with DCM and washed with sodium bicarbonate solution. The organic layer was extracted with DCM, dried over sodium sulfate and filtered through a cotton plug. The resulting solution was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford 18-1. LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C29H28N3O6S2 [M + H]+: 578.14; Found: 578.1.

After that, 6-Bromohexanoyl chloride (1.5 equiv.) was slowly added to a stirred solution of 18-1 with TEA (3.0 equiv.) in DCM (0.1 M) at room temperature and the solution was stirred for 6 h. After 18-1 was fully consumed, the solvent was removed, and crude mixture was dissolved in acetonitrile (0.1 M) followed by addition of triphenylphosphine (3.0 equiv.). The mixture was stirred under reflux condition for 2 days. The crude product was purified by reverse-phase-HPLC to afford a desired Mito-18. [HPLC solvents consist of water containing 0.1% TFA (trifluoroacetic acid) for solvent A, and acetonitrile containing 0.1% TFA for solvent B]

(6-((3-(2,6-bis(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-9-oxo-7H-furo[3,2- e ]pyrrolo[3,4- b ]indolizin-8(9 H )-yl)propyl)amino)-6-oxohexyl)triphenylphosphonium (Mito-18)

figure aj

Yield: 24% (overall yield over 3 steps); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.94–7.84 (m, 7H), 7.80–7.69 (m, 13H), 4.73 (s, 2H), 3.61–3.51 (m, 4H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 3.13–3.08 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.06–2.03 (m, 2H), 1,81–1.76 (m, 2H), 1.51–1.47 (m, 6H); LRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C53H51N3O7PS2 [M]+: 936.29; Found: 936.2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, Y. (2018). Rational Development of Furoindolizine Core Skeleton Guided by Oscillator Strength. In: Systematic Exploration of Indolizine-Based Small Fluorescent Molecules. Springer Theses. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1645-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics