Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Studies of an Indolizine-Based Seoul-Fluor System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systematic Exploration of Indolizine-Based Small Fluorescent Molecules

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 310 Accesses

Abstract

Fluorescent quantum yield is one of the most important photophysical properties, governing the brightness of a given fluorescent molecule [1]. Understanding the relationship between the structure and the quantum yield of a certain fluorophore system often elicits the rational design of novel turn-on fluorescent biosensors [2]. Although there are dozens of reported fluorophore systems [3], only a few studies have systematically elucidated the change of fluorescent quantum yields from a structural point of view [4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. de Silva AP, Gunaratne HQN, Gunnlaugsson T, Huxley AJM, McCoy CP, Rademacher JT, Rice TE (1997) Chem Rev 97:1515–1566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yao S, Belfield KD (2012) Eur J Org Chem 3199–3217

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lavis LD, Raines RT (2008) ACS Chem Biol 3:142–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. (a) Miura T, Urano Y, Tanaka K, Nagano T, Ohkubo K, Fukuzumi S (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:8666–8671. (b) Ueno T, Urano Y, Setsukinai K, Takakusa H, Kojima H, Kikuchi K, Ohkubo K, Fukuzumi S, Nagano T (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:14079–1408. (c) Urano Y, Kamiya M, Kanda K, Ueno T, Hirose K, Nagano T (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:4888–4894. (d) Ueno T, Urano Y, Kojima H, Nagano T, J Am Chem Soc 128:10640–10641

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim E, Koh M, Ryu J, Park SB (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130:12206–12207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim E, Koh M, Lim BJ, Park SB (2011) J Am Chem Soc 133:6642–6649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uchiyama S, Kimura K, Gota C, Okabe K, Kawamoto K, Inada N, Yoshihara T, Tobita S (2012) Chem—A Eur J 18:9552–9563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. (a) Chen X, Engle KM, Wang D, Yu J (2009) Angew Chem 121:5196–5217; Angew Chem Int Ed 48:5094–5115. (b) Dupont J, Consorti CS, Spencer J (2005) Chem Rev 105:2527–2572. (c) Cho SH, Kim JY, Kwak J, Chang S (2011) Chem Soc Rev 40:5068–5083. (d) Lyons TW, Sanford MS (2010) Chem Rev 110:1147–1169

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hansch C, Leo A, Taft RW (1991) Chem Rev 91:165–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kollmannsberger M, Rurack K, Resch-Genger U, Daub J (1998) J Phys Chem A 102:10211–10220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Martino DM, van Willigen H, Spitler MT (1997) J Phys Chem B 101:8914–8919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy J (2001) Prog Lipid Res 40:325–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Farese RV Jr, Walther TC (2009) Cell 139:855–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. (a) den Boer M, Voshol PJ, Kuipers F, Havekes LM, Romijn JA (2004) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24:644–649. (b) Paul A, Chan L, Bickel PE (2008) Curr Hypertens Rep 10:461–466. (c) Greenberg AS, Coleman RA, Kraemer FB, McManaman JL, Obin MS, Puri V, Yan Q-W, Miyoshi H, Mashek DG (2011) J Clin Invest 121:2102–2110

    Google Scholar 

  15. Straub BK, Herpel E, Singer S, Zimbelmann R, Breuhahn K, Goeppinger SM, Warth A, Koch JL, Longerich T, Heid H, Schirmacher P (2010) Modern Pathol 23:480–492

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walther TC, Farese RV Jr (2009) Biochim Biophys Acta 1791:459–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wijffels RH, Barbosa MJ (2010) Science 329:796–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. (a) Lee JH, So J-H, Jeon JH, Choi EB, Lee Y-R, Chang Y-T, Kim C-H, Bae MA, Ahn JH (2011) Chem Commun 47:7500–7502. (b) Greenspan P, Mayer EP, Fowler SD (1985) J Cell Biol 100:965–973

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim E, Lee S, Park SB (2012) Chem Commun 48:2331–2333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendoloski JJ (1998) J Phys Chem A 102:3762–3772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Siaut M, Cuiné S, Cagnon C, Fessler B, Nguyen M, Carrier P, Beyly A, Beisson F, Triantaphylidès C, Beisson YL, Peltier G (2011) BMC Biotechnol 11:7

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beer LL, Boyd ES, Peters JW, Posewitz MC (2009) Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:264–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chisti Y (2007) Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertozzini E, Galluzzi L, Penna A, Magnani M (2011) J Microbiol Methods 87:17–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen W, Zhang C, Song L, Sommerfeld M, Hu Q (2009) J Microbiol Methods 77:41–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. (a) Montero MF, Aristizábal M, Reina GG (2011) J Appl Phycol 23:1053–1057. (b) Hanagata N, Takeuchi T, Fukuju Y, Barnes DJ, Karube I (1992) Phytochemistry 31:3345–3348

    Google Scholar 

  27. (a) Kim E, Lee S, Park SB (2011) Chem Commun 47:7734–7736. (b) Jeong MS, Kim E, Kang HJ, Choi EJ, Cho AR, Chung SJ, Park SB (2012) Chem Commun 48:6553–6555. (c) Choi EJ, Park SB (2015) Org Biomol Chem 13:5202–5208

    Google Scholar 

  28. (a) Lee Y, Na S, Lee S, Jeon NL, Park SB (2013) Mol Biosyst 9:952–956. (b) Choi EJ, Kim E, Lee Y, Jo A, Park SB (2014) Angew Chem Int Ed 53:1346–1350

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Experimental Section

Experimental Section

2.1.1 General Experimental Information

The density functional theory (DFT) calculation in Sect. 2.1 was performed using the Materials Studio® 4.2 program (Accelrys Software Inc.). A generalized gradient approximation (GAA) for the exchange correlation function of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) was used together with double numerical with polarization basis set (DNP), which is implemented in DMol3.

1H and 13C NMR spectra in Sect. 2.2 were recorded on Agilent 400-MR (Agilent Technologies) and Varian Inova-500 (Varian Associates), and chemical shifts were measured in ppm downfield from internal tetramethylsilane (TMS) standard. Multiplicity was indicated as follows: s (singlet); d (doublet); t (triplet); q (quartet); m (multiplet); dd (doublet of doublet); dt (doublet of triplet); br s (broad singlet), etc. Coupling constants were reported in Hz. Routine mass analyses were performed on LC/MS system equipped with a reverse phase column (C-18, 50 × 2.1 mm, 5 μm) and photodiode array detector using electron spray ionization (ESI) or atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI). The identity of desired fluorescence compounds were further confirmed by high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). The HRMS analyses were conducted at the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory of Seoul National University by direct injection on a JEOL JMS 600 W spectrometer using electron impact (EI) or chemical ionization (CI), and JEOL JMS AX505WA spectrometer using fast atom bombardment (FAB) method. Excitation maxima and emission maxima were measured by Cary Eclipse Fluorescence spectrophotometer (Varian Assocociates) and absolute fluorescent quantum yield of all compounds in this chapter was measured by QE-1000 (OTSUKA Electronics). Triethylamine, diisobutylaluminium hydride, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), sodium borohydride, bromoacetyl bromide, sodium hydride, 4-acetyl pyridine, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ), trifluoroacetic acid, acetic acid, anhydrous dimethyl formamide (DMF) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., LTD. The progress of reaction was monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) (silica gel 60, F254 0.25 mm), and components were visualized by observation under UV light (254 and 365 nm) or by treating the TLC plates with anisaldehyde, KMnO4, and ninhydrin followed by heating. Solvents were purchased from commercial venders and used without further purification. Distilled water was polished by ion exchange and filtration. Biochemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Ez-cytox kit was purchased from Daeil Co. and was used for the cell viability test. Commercial dyes Nile Red were purchased from Invitrogen.

Fluorescence microscope and analysis program for Bio-Imaging experiment.

Fluorescence microscopy studies for mammalian LDs were conducted with Olympus Inverted Microscope Model IX71, equipped for epi-illumination using a halogen bulb (Philips No. 7724). Emission signal of each experiments were observed at two spectral setting: green channel, using a 450–480 band pass exciter filter, a 500 nm center wavelength chromatic beam splitter, a 515 nm–long pass barrier filter (Olympus filter set U-MWB2); and red channel using a 510–550 band pass exciter filter, a 570 nm center wavelength chromatic beam splitter, a 590 nm–long pass barrier filter (Olympus filter set U-MWG2). Emission signals of each experiment were detected with 12.5 M pixel recording digital color camera (Olympus, DP71) Algae study was carried out using a FluoView FV1000 confocal laser scanning unit with Olympus Inverted Microscope Model IX81 and Confocal PMT detector, equipped for Multi-line Ar Laser (488 nm). Fluorescence images were analyzed and quantified by Image-Pro Plus® 6.2 program, and all graphs were figured by GraphPad Prism 5. Algal figures were processed by IMARIS software (Bitplane). The quantified data are processed via the mean measurement of 40–50 cells from at least three different independent experiments and SEM.

Cell culture

HeLa cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection. HeLa cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 [GIBCO, Invitrogen] supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum [GIBCO, Invitrogen] and 1% (v/v) antibiotic-antimycotic solution [GIBCO, Invitrogen]. Cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C, and cultured in 100 mm cell culture dish [CORNING]. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cell was obtained from Chlamydomonas Resource Center. Chlamydomonas cell strain number was CC-503 cw 92 mt + . Cell was cultured in 500 mL glass flask with stir incubator at 25 °C and normal atmosphere. Algae logarithmic phase was maintained with tris-acetate-phosphate (TAP) medium, and then cell grown under nitrogen privation condition media in 6 days.

2.1.2 Experimental Procedure

Image-based screening of SF44 analogues with HeLa cells.

HeLa cells were treated for 15 min with 5 μM solutions of series of Seoul-Fluor-based bioprobes in RPMI media, supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and 1% (v/v) antibiotic-antimycotic solution. Without media washing, fluorescent images of stained cells were captured using fluorescence microscopy and their fluorescent intensity were determined from the region of interest (ROI) and was quantified by Image-Pro Plus® 6.2 program

Image-based screening of SF44 analogues with chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Nitrogen-starved cells for 6 days (density \(2. 4\; \times \; 10^{ 6}\) cells/ml) were treated with 5 μM solution of series of Seoul-Fluor-based bioprobe in 2% DMSO solution. Nitrogen starvation facilitates the formation of lipid droplets in microalgae. After 25 min incubation, microalga were observed by Z-depth-controlled image captured in confocal fluorescent microscopy.

In Vitro cytotoxicity test.

Cell viability was measured by the EZ-Cytox assay kit, and the experimental procedure was based on the manufacturer’s manual. HeLa cells were cultured into 96-well plates at a density of 3 × 103 cells/well for 24 h, followed by the treatment of compounds in various concentrations. After 12 h of incubation with increasing concentration, 10 μL of WST-1 solution, (2-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2-sulfophenyl)-3-[4-(4-sulfophenylazo)-2-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium disodium salt, was added to each well, and plates were incubated for an additional 1 h at 37 °C. To measure the viability in microalgae, cells were seeded in 96 well plate and treated with series of Seoul-Fluor-based bioprobes or Nile Red. Final concentration of fluorescent probe was 5 μM (Seoul-Fluor-based bioprobes) in 2% DMSO solution or 0.1 μg/mL (Nile Red) in 20% DMSO solution. After 12, 24 and 36 h incubation, cell viability was measured by identical protocol for assay with HeLa cells. The resulting signal was observed after 90 min incubation at 25 °C. Absorbance in 455 nm was measured by microplate reader. The percentage of cell viability was calculated by following formula: % cell viability = (mean absorbance in test wells)/(mean absorbance in control well) × 100. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.1.3 Compound Characterization Data

7-Acetyl-9-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-2-(1-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1 H -pyrrolo[3,4-β]indolizin-3(2 H )-one (SF55)

figure a

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.46 (dd, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (dd, J = 1.5, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (dd, J = 2.0, 7.0 Hz, 2H), 4.52 (q, J = 16.5 Hz, 2H), 4.41 (m, 1H), 3.92–3.75 (m, 2H), 3.03 (s, 6H), 2.57 (s, 3H), 1.35 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.7, 162.4, 134.5, 134.1, 128.4, 124.5, 122.9, 121.8, 121.5, 114.8, 113.3, 113.2, 109.2, 70.7, 65.6, 50.9, 43.8, 40.7, 26.2, 15.5; HRMS (FAB): m/z calcd for C23H25N3O3 [M]+: 391.1896; found: 391.1893.

figure b

7-Acetyl-2-(3-aminopropyl)-9-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-1 H -pyrrolo[3,4-β]indolizin-3(2 H )-one (SF56)

figure c

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.51 (dd, J = 0.8, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 8.39 (s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (dd, J = 1.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 3.71 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.43 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 2.77 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.60 (s, 3H), 1.82 (pentet, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.6, 161.8, 146.8, 134.0, 133.9, 128.7, 128.3, 124.4, 122.8, 122.0, 120.2, 115.0, 112.2, 109.1, 46.5, 44.4, 40.1, 39.0, 32.3, 26.0, 12.7; HRMS (FAB): m/z calcd for C25H31N4O2 [M + H]+ 419.2447, found 419.2445.

figure d

7-Acetyl-9-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-2-(3-morpholinopropyl)-1H-pyrrolo[3,4-β]indolizin-3(2 H )-one (SF57)

figure e

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.57 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (s, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 4.00–3.90 (m, 4H), 3.75 (t, J = 6 Hz, 2H), 3.62 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 4H), 3.52 (d, J = 11 Hz, 2H), 3.13 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 2.88 (br s, 2H), 2.65 (s, 3H), 2.24 (pentet, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.4, 161.9, 136.0, 135.7, 135.3, 135.2, 130.4, 129.2, 125.0, 123.5, 122.3, 120.4, 112.1, 110.3, 63.8, 55.1, 53.4, 52.3, 46.1, 39.6, 26.2, 23.1, 10.4; HRMS (FAB): m/z calcd for C29H37N4O3 [M + H]+ 489.2866, found 489.2864.

figure f

tert -Butyl (2-(7-acetyl-9-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-3-oxo-1H-pyrrolo[3,4-β]indolizin-2(3 H )-yl)ethyl)carbamate (SF44)

figure g

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.50 (dd, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.39 (s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (dd, J = 1.7, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 4.97 (br s, 1H), 4.56 (s, 2H), 3.73 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 3.45–3.41 (m, 6H), 2.60 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 9H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 195.6, 162.2, 156.3, 146.8, 134.3, 133.9, 128.6, 128.2, 124.3, 122.4, 122.0, 120.1, 115.0, 112.3, 108.9, 79.5, 47.3, 44.5, 43.1, 39.8, 28.4, 26.0, 12.7; HRMS (FAB): m/z calcd for C29H36N4O4 [M]+ 504.2737, found 504.2743.

figure h

Benzyl (3-(7-acetyl-9-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)-3-oxo-1H-pyrrolo[3,4-β]indolizin-2(3 H )-yl)propyl)carbamate (SF58)

figure i

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.47 (dd, J = 0.75, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (s, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 7.37–7.26(m, 5H), 7.22 (dd, J = 1.5, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H), 5.82 (br s, J = 5.75 1H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 4.47 (s, 2H), 3.68 (t, 6 Hz, 2H), 3.43 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 3.23 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 2.60 (s, 3H), 1.84 (pentet, J = 5.75 Hz, 2H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.9, 162.5, 156.9, 147.1, 137.1, 134.5, 134.3, 129.0, 128.77, 128.75, 128.3, 128.0, 124.8, 122.7, 122.3, 120.3, 115.4, 112.6, 109.5, 66.9, 47.0, 44.8, 40.3, 37.9, 28.9, 26.3, 13.0; HRMS (FAB) m/z calcd for C33H36N4O4 [M]+ 552.2737, found 552.2744.

figure j

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, Y. (2018). A Comprehensive Studies of an Indolizine-Based Seoul-Fluor System. In: Systematic Exploration of Indolizine-Based Small Fluorescent Molecules. Springer Theses. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1645-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics