Abstract
CA model for protein is covered in this chapter. Design of CA rule for amino acid backbone is reported followed by the design of PCAM (Protein Modelling CA Machine). A protein chain with n amino acids is represented by 8n cell PCAM, each amino acid is represented with 8 CA cells. Digitally encoded amino acid side chain with 8-bit string is used as the initial state of 8 CA cells used for its backbone. For a protein chain, provision of 64 PCAMs is provided for modelling its interaction with different biomolecules. Protein interaction modelling is reported for two applications—(i) predicting binding contact residues for protein–protein interaction, and (ii) mutational study. Predicted results derived out of PCAM model are validated against the wet lab experimental results reported in databases and publications. In addition to validation of the results, the case study identifies which specific PCAM (out of the available 64) is appropriate for modelling the interaction. The binding affinity of two Monoclonal Antibodies (MAbs) on wild and mutated version of PD-L1 (implicated cancer immunotherapy) are reported confirming the CA rule appropriate for the mutational study of PD-L1 for a specific MAb.
“Genes are effectively one-dimensional. If you write down the sequence of A, C, G and T, that’s kind of what you need to know about that gene. But proteins are three-dimensional. They have to be because we are three-dimensional, and we’re made of those proteins. Otherwise we’d all sort of be linear, unimaginably weird creatures”.
—Francis Collins
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Y, Ofran, Rost, B.: Protein–protein interaction hot-spots carved into sequences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3(7), 119 (2007)
Kundrotas, P., Belkin, S., Vakser, I.: Structure-function relationships in protein complexes. Biophys. J. 114(3), 46a (2018)
Fersht, A.: Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding. World Sci. 9 (2017)
Webb, B., Sali, A.: Protein structure modeling with MODELLER, pp. 1–15. Humana Press, New York, NY (2014)
Lee, J., Freddolino, P.L., Zhang, Y.: Ab initio protein structure prediction. From protein structure to function with bioinformatics, pp. 3–35. Springer, Dordrecht (2017)
Moult, J., et al.: Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—round XII. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 86, 7–15 (2017)
Moreira, I.S., et al.: SpotOn: high accuracy identification of protein-protein interface hot-spots. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 8007 (2017)
Burks, C., Farmer, D.: Towards modeling DNA sequences as automata. Physica D: nonlinear phenomena 10(1–2), 157–167 (1984)
Sirakoulis, G., Karafyllidis, I., Mizas, C., Mardiris, V., Thanailakis, A., Tsalides, P.: A cellular automaton model for the study of dna sequence evolution. Comput. Biol. Med. 33(5), 439–453 (2003)
Mizas, C., Sirakoulis, G., Mardiris, V., Karafyllidis, I., Glykos, N., Sandaltzopoulos, R.: Reconstruction of dna sequences using genetic algorithms and cellular automata: towards mutation prediction? Biosystems 92(1), 61–68 (2008)
de Sales, J.A., Martins, M.L., Stariolo, D.A.: Cellular automata model for gene networks. Phys. Rev. E 55, 3262–3270 (1997)
Xiao, X., Shao, S., Ding, Y., Chen, X.: Digital coding for amino acid based on cellular automata. In: 2004 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol. 5, pp. 4593–4598. Oct 2004
Xiao, X., Shao, S., Ding, Y., Huang, Z., Chou, K.-C.: Using cellular automata images and pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein subcellular location. Amino Acids 30(1), 49–54 (2006)
Xiao, X., Wang, P., Chou, K.-C.: Gpcr-ca: a cellular automaton image approach for predicting g-protein-coupled receptor functional classes. J. Comput. Chem. 30(9), 1414–1423 (2008)
Xiao, X., Ling, W.: Using cellular automata images to predict protein structural classes. In: The 1st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, pp. 346–349. ICBBE 2007, July 2007
Xiao, X., Wang, P., Chou, K.-C.: Predicting protein structural classes with pseudo amino acid composition: An approach using geometric moments of cellular automaton image. J. Theor. Biol. 254(3), 691–696 (2008)
Chou, K.-C.: Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo amino acid composition. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 43, 246–255 (2001)
Chou, K.-C.: Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition. J. Theor. Biol. 273(1), 236–247 (2011)
Xiao, X., Wang, P., Chou, K.-C.: Cellular automata and its applications in protein bioinformatics. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 12(6), 508–519 (2011)
Santos, J., Villot, P., Dieguez, M.: Cellular automata for modeling protein folding using the HP model. In: 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1586–1593. June 2013
Santos, J., Villot, P., Dieguez, M.: Emergent protein folding modeled ´ with evolved neural cellular automata using the 3D HP model. J. Comput. Biol. 21(11), 823–845 (2014)
Chopra, P., Bender, A.: Evolved cellular automata for protein secondary structure prediction imitate the determinants for folding observed in nature. Silico Biology 7(7), 87–93 (2006)
Cristea P.: Independent component analysis for genetic signals. In: SPIE Conference BIOS 2001-International Biomedical Optics Symposium, pp. 20–26. San Jose, USA, January 2001
Pan, Y.X., et al.: Application of pseudo amino acid composition for predicting protein subcellular location: stochastic signal processing approach. J. Protein Chem. 22(4), 395–402 (2003)
Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K.: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 6, 610–621 (1973)
De Maesschalck, R., DelphineJouan, R., Massart, D.L.: The mahalanobis distance. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 50(1), 1–18 (2000)
Petta, I., Lievens, S., Libert, C., Tavernier, J., De Bosscher, K.: Modulation of protein–protein interactions for the development of novel therapeutics. Mol. Ter. 24, 707–718 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2015.214
Clackson, T., Wells, J.A.: A hot-spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 267, 383–386 (1995)
Te Moreira, I.S.: Role of water occlusion for the definition of a protein binding hot-spot. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 15, 2068–2079 (2015)
Moreira, I.S., Fernandes, P.A., Ramos, M.J.: Hot-spots—a review of the protein-protein interface determinant amino-acid residues. Proteins 68, 803–812 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21396
Ramos, R.M., Moreira, I.S.: Computational Alanine scanning mutagenesis—an improved methodological approach for protein DNA complexes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 4243–4256 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400387r
Brender, J.R., Zhang, Y.: Predicting the effect of mutations on protein-protein binding interactions through structure-based interface profiles. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004494 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004494
Xue, L.C., Dobbs, D., Bonvin, A.M.J.J., Honavar, V.: Computational prediction of protein interfaces: a review of data driven methods. FEBS Lett. 589, 3516–3526 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2015.10.003
Melo, R., et al.: A machine learning approach for hot-spot detection at protein-protein interfaces. Int. J. Molec. Sci. 17, 1215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081215
Chou, K.C.: Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition. J. Theor. Biol. 273, 236–247 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024
Chen, W., Feng, P., Ding, H., Lin, H.: PAI: predicting adenosine to inosine editing sites by using pseudo nucleotide compositions. Sci. Rep. 6, 35123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35123
Herbst, R.S., Soria, J.C., Kowanetz, M., Fine, G.D., Hamid, O., Gordon, M.S., Sosman, J.A., McDermott, D.F., Powderly, J.D., Gettinger, S.N., Kohrt, H.E., Horn, L., Lawrence, D.P., et al.: Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature 515, 563–567 (2014)
Chen, L., Flies, D.B.: Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 227–242 (2013)
Greenwald, R.J., Freeman, G.J., Sharpe, A.H.: The B7 family revisited. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 23, 515–548 (2005)
Lenschow, D.J., Walunas, T.L., Bluestone, J.A.: CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 14, 233–258 (1996)
Carreno, B.M., Collins, M.: The B7 family of ligands and its receptors: new pathways for costimulation and inhibition of immune responses. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 20, 29–53 (2002)
Dong, H., Zhu, G., Tamada, K., Chen, L.: B7-H1, a third member of the B7 family, co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat. Med. 5, 1365–1369 (1999)
Tan, S., Zhang, C.W., Gao, G.F.: Seeing is believing: anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in action for checkpoint blockade tumor immunotherapy. Signal Trans. Target. Therap. 1, 16029 (2016)
Zhang, F., et al.: Structural basis of the therapeutic anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab. Oncotarget 8(52), 90215–90224 (2017)
Tan, S., et al.: Distinct PD-L1 binding characteristics of therapeutic monoclonal antibody durvalumab. Protein Cell 9(1), 135–139 (2018)
Gay, C.L., et al.: Clinical trial of the anti-PD-L1 antibody BMS-936559 in HIV-1 infected participants on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 215(11), 1725–1733 (2017)
Wishart, D.S., et al.: DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 46(D1), D1074–D1082 (2017)
Zhang, F., Wei, H., Wang, X., Bai, Y., Wang, P., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Wang, Y., Cai, H., Xu, T., Zhou, A.: Structural basis of a novel PD-L1 nanobody for immune checkpoint blockade. Cell Discov. 3, 17004 (2017)
Zak, K.M., Grudnik, P., Guzik, K., Zieba, B.J., Musielak, B., Dömling, A., Dubin, G., Holak, T.A.: Structural basis for small molecule targeting of the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Oncotarget 7, 30323–30335 (2016)
Guzik, K., Zak, K.M., Grudnik, P., Magiera, K., Musielak, B., Törner, R., Skalniak, L., Dömling, A., Dubin, G., Holak, T.A.: Small-molecule inhibitors of the programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) interaction via transiently induced protein states and dimerization of PD-L1. J. Med. Chem. 60, 5857–5867 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pal Chaudhuri, P., Ghosh, S., Dutta, A., Pal Choudhury, S. (2018). Cellular Automata (CA) Model for Protein. In: A New Kind of Computational Biology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1639-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1639-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1638-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1639-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)