Skip to main content

Significance of the Distribution of Income and Structure of Credit Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Income Distribution, Market Imperfections and Capital Accumulation in a Developing Economy
  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

The importance of distribution of income and structure of credit market as factors responsible for this crisis is brought out more precisely in this chapter, where the results of this model are compared with those of a hypothetical situation involving a more equal distribution of income and a more perfect credit market. It is shown that the two crucial issues—equalisation of income and perfection of the rural credit market—are essentially interconnected. It is therefore not possible to lessen this imperfection without improving the equality-content of distribution of income.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We have noted in this connection that there are certain administrative problems connected with credit operation in the rural areas which help preserve the monopoly power of the local capitalist farm as the money lender. But, we have also seen that these administrative problems are again fundamentally due to the family farms having a low level of income and small amount of asset (land). Hence any attempt to perfect the rural credit market by focusing attention only on the administrative problems and without any regard to the fundamental cause of these problems is likely to be self-defeating. In India, for example, the attempts to solve the problem by setting up the cooperative banks, unaccompanied by any change in the basic income and asset position of the family farms, have often ended up diverting funds in favour of the capitalist farms. To solve the problem, therefore, it is essential to think in terms of improving the average income (and asset holding) of the family farm. But improving the average income of the family farm will also imply, in a situation of not sufficiently high rate of capital accumulation and in the absence of any significant exogenous change, a reduction in the average income of the capitalist farm (by Preposition 3) and therefore a redistribution of income, at least in the beginning of the process.

References

  • Bhaduri, A. (1983). The Economic Structure of Backward Agriculture. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). The Great Divide. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, A.K. (2018). Significance of the Distribution of Income and Structure of Credit Market. In: Income Distribution, Market Imperfections and Capital Accumulation in a Developing Economy. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1633-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1633-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1632-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1633-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics