Abstract
Two new concepts, systemic technology choice and interlocking innovations, are summarized. Four modes of science and technology circulation (diffusion, appropriation, translation, and contestation) are likewise summarized. The conceptual contribution of contestation in a global field of science and its relationship to circular causality in the multi-level of perspective is illuminated. The implications of the dual regime thesis for the multi-level perspective on socio-technical system transitions and multi-regime interactions are revealed. New questions and future work are proposed for science and technology studies and international relations theory. The surprise of the Aravind model traveling from India to the USA is briefly discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benjamin, Ruha. 2009. “A Lab of Their Own: Genomic Sovereignty as Postcolonial Science Policy.” Policy and Society 28 (4): 341–55.
Crum, Robert. 2015. “An Innovative Ophthalmological and Financial Model for People at All Economic Levels.” Program Results Report. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/program_results_reports/2015/rwjf419225.
Debaise, Didier. 2013. “A Philosophy of Interstices: Thinking Subjects and Societies from Whitehead’s Philosophy.” Subjectivity 6 (1): 101–11.
Demchak, Chris C., and Peter J. Dombrowski. 2014. “Rise of a Cybered Westphalian Age: The Coming Decades.” In The Global Politics of Science and Technology—Vol. 1—Concepts from International Relations and Other Disciplines, edited by Maximilian Mayer, Mariana Carpes, and Ruth Knoblich, 91–113. Global Power Shift: Comparative Analysis and Perspectives. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
Furlong, Kathryn. 2014. “STS Beyond the ‘Modern Infrastructure Ideal’: Extending Theory by Engaging with Infrastructure Challenges in the South.” Technology in Society 38 (August): 139–47.
Geels, Frank W. 2005a. “Conceptual Perspective on Sytems Innovations and Technological Transitions.” In Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis, 75–102. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
———. 2005b. “The Dynamics of Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: A Multi-level Analysis of the Transition Pathway from Horse-Drawn Carriages to Automobiles (1860–1930).” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (4): 445–76.
———. 2005c. “Processes and Patterns in Transitions and System Innovations: Refining the Co-evolutionary Multi-Level Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Transitions towards Sustainability through System Innovation 72 (6): 681–96.
———. 2007. “Analysing the Breakthrough of Rock ‘n’ Roll (1930–1970) Multi-regime Interaction and Reconfiguration in the Multi-level Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (8): 1411–31.
Geels, Frank W., and Johan Schot. 2007. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417.
Geels, Frank W., Florian Kern, Gerhard Fuchs, Nele Hinderer, Gregor Kungl, Josephine Mylan, Mario Neukirch, and Sandra Wassermann. 2016. “The Enactment of Socio-Technical Transition Pathways: A Reformulated Typology and a Comparative Multi-level Analysis of the German and UK Low-Carbon Electricity Transitions (1990–2014).” Research Policy 45 (4): 896–913.
Herrera, Geoffrey Lucas. 2006. “International Systems Theory, Technology and Transformation.” In Technology and International Transformation: The Railroad, the Atom Bomb, and the Politics of Technological Change, 13–44. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hess, David J. 2016. Undone Science: Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hughes, Thomas Parke. 1987. “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas Parke Hughes, and Trevor J. Pinch, 51–82. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
———. 1994. “Technological Momentum.” In Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, edited by Merritt Roe Smith and Leo Marx, 101–114. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Mahony, Martin. 2014. “The Predictive State: Science, Territory and the Future of the Indian Climate.” Social Studies of Science 44 (1): 109–33.
Mehta, Pavithra K., and Suchitra Shenoy. 2011. Infinite Vision: How Aravind Became the World’s Greatest Business Case for Compassion. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Nieusma, Dean. 2007. “Challenging Knowledge Hierarchies: Working Toward Sustainable Development in Sri Lanka’s Energy Sector.” Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy 3: 32–44.
Odumosu, Toluwalogo B. 2009. Interrogating Mobiles: A Story of Nigerian Appropriation of the Mobile Phone. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Science and Technology Studies.
Onsongo, Elsie Khakasa, and Johan Schot. 2017. “Inclusive Innovation and Rapid Sociotechnical Transitions: The Case of Mobile Money in Kenya.” SWPS 2017–07. SPRU Working Paper Series. Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex.
Pacific Vision Foundation. 2017. “Thanks to Our Sponsors: The Eye Institute Grand Opening October 4, 2017.” Horizons: The Pacific Vision Foundation Newsletter, December 2017.
Raven, Rob. 2007. “Co-evolution of Waste and Electricity Regimes: Multi-regime Dynamics in the Netherlands (1969–2003).” Energy Policy 35 (4): 2197–2208.
Raven, Rob, and Geert Verbong. 2007. “Multi-regime Interactions in the Dutch Energy Sector: The Case of Combined Heat and Power Technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19 (4): 491–507.
Raven, Rob, Johan Schot, and Frans Berkhout. 2012. “Space and Scale in Socio-Technical Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 4 (September): 63–78.
Salm, Martin, Daniel Belsky, and Frank A. Sloan. 2006. “Trends in Cost of Major Eye Diseases to Medicare, 1991 to 2000.” American Journal of Ophthalmology 142 (6): 976–82.
Samsky, Ari. 2012. “Scientific Sovereignty: How International Drug Donation Programs Reshape Health, Disease, and the State.” Cultural Anthropology 27 (2): 310–32.
Shepherd, Chris J. 2006. “From in Vitro to in Situ on the Precarious Extension of Agricultural Science in the Indigenous ‘Third World’.” Social Studies of Science 36 (3): 399–426.
Stark, Walter J., Alfred Sommer, and Ronald E. Smith. 1989. “Changing Trends in Intraocular Lens Implantation.” Archives of Ophthalmology 107 (10): 1441–44.
Stephenson, Niamh. 2011. “Emerging Infectious Disease/Emerging Forms of Biological Sovereignty.” Science, Technology & Human Values 36 (5): 616–37.
Sutherland, Lee-Ann, Sarah Peter, and Lukas Zagata. 2015. “Conceptualising Multi-regime Interactions: The Role of the Agriculture Sector in Renewable Energy Transitions.” Research Policy 44 (8): 1543–54.
Williams, Logan D. A. 2017. “Getting Undone Technology Done: Global Techno-Assemblage and the Value Chain of Invention.” Science, Technology and Society 22 (1): 38–58.
Williams, Logan D. A., and Thomas S. Woodson. 2012. “The Future of Innovation Studies in Less Economically Developed Countries.” Minerva 50 (2): 221–37.
Worthington, Richard. 1993. “Introduction: Science and Technology as a Global System.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 18 (2): 176–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, L.D.A. (2019). Conclusion: Innovation from Below. In: Eradicating Blindness. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1625-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1625-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1624-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1625-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)