Advertisement

Appendix A: The Extended Case Method and Global Ethnography

  • Logan D. A. WilliamsEmail author
Chapter
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter outlines the methods used to conduct a feminist postcolonial ethnography of community ophthalmology organizations. Burawoy’s extended case method/global ethnography has key features which are introduced, along with the research paradigm for the project. Site selection is elaborated; additionally, interlocutor selection and sample demographics are briefly reviewed. The creation of ethnographic field notes for various observations is carefully delineated. Archival research in three locations and online is summarized. The process of data analysis which is iterative, inductive, deductive, and abductive is also described.

Keywords

Extended Case Method (ECM) Global Ethnography Community Ophthalmology Burawoy Site Narratives 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Basalla, George. 1967. The Spread of Western Science. Science 156 (3775): 611–22.Google Scholar
  2. Blumer, Herbert. 1954. “What Is Wrong with Social Theory.” American Sociological Review, 18: 3–10.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, Antony, and Kathy Charmaz. 2007. “Grounded Theory in Historical Perspective: An Epistemological Account.” In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by Antony Bryant and Kathy Charmaz, 31–57. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Burawoy, Michael. 1991. “Conclusion: The Extended Case Method.” In Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis, edited by Michael Burawoy, 271–87. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16: 4–33.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2000. “Introduction: Reaching for the Global.” In Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World, edited by Michael Burawoy, Joseph A. Blum, Sheba George, Zsuzsa Gille, Millie Thayer, Teresa Gowan, Lynne Haney, Maren Klawiter, Steve H. Lopez, and Sean Riain, 1st ed., 1–40. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eliasoph, Nina, and Paul Lichterman. 1999. “‘We Begin with Our Favorite Theory…’: Reconstructing the Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 17 (2): 228–34.Google Scholar
  8. Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. 2nd ed. Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fuller, Steve. 2006. “Seeking Science in the Field: Life Beyond the Laboratory.” In The Sage Handbook of Fieldwork, edited by Dick Hobbs and Richard Wright, 333–44. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Gille, Zsuzsa, and Seán Ó Riain. 2002. “Global Ethnography.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 271–95.Google Scholar
  11. Given, Lisa. 2008. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Glaeser, Andreas. 2005. “An Ontology for the Ethnographic Analysis of Social Processes: Extending the Extended-Case Method.” Social Analysis 49: 16–45.Google Scholar
  13. Hess, David J. 2001. “Ethnography and the Development of Science and Technology Studies.” In Handbook of Ethnography, edited by Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland, and Lyn Lofland. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Heyl, Barbara Sherman. 2001. “Ethnographic Interviewing.” In Handbook of Ethnography, edited by Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland, and Lyn Lofland, 369–83. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Lapegna, Pablo. 2009. “Ethnographers of the World United? Current Debates on the Ethnographic Study of Globalization.” Journal of World-Systems Research 15 (1): 3–24.  https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2009.336.
  16. Lempert, Lora Bex. 2007. “Asking Questions of the Data: Memo Writing in the Grounded Theory Tradition.” In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by Antony Bryant and Kathy Charmaz, 245–65. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-Glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Marcus, George E. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1): 95.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2009. “Multi-sited Ethnography: Notes and Queries.” In Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research, edited by Mark-Anthony Falzon, 181–96. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. O’Reilly, Karen. 2012. Ethnographic Methods. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Small, Mario Luis. 2009. “‘How Many Cases Do I Need?’: On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography 10 (1): 5–38.Google Scholar
  22. Stirrat, R. L., and Dinah Rajak. 2011. “The Romance of the Field?” In The Anthropologist and the Native: Essays for Gananath Obeyesekere, edited by H. L. Seneviratne, 1000–25. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, Logan D. A. 2018. “Mapping Superpositionality in Global Ethnography.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 43 (2): 198–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Logan Williams Consultancy Services, LLCCumberlandUSA

Personalised recommendations