Abstract
In this chapter, we examine the beliefs about science investigation held by the two primary teachers who participated in the study and consider how these beliefs translated into their practice. A description of each teacher’s practice of science investigation during Phase 1 of the project is provided along with findings from analysis of observations. We identify strategies these teachers were already incorporating into their teaching in the three key areas that were the focus of the study: supporting students to investigate scientifically; connecting students’ practical experiences to key scientific concepts and making learning about the nature of science explicit. Finally, we consider how practices impacted student learning through an analysis of student interviews and work samples, discussing some of the challenges that were identified during each set of observations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This programme was part of the New Zealand Science, Mathematics and Technology Teacher Fellowship Scheme funded by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand. It has been adapted to include junior high school science teachers and is now known as the Science Teacher Leadership Programme (http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/teaching-learning/science-teaching-leadership-programme/).
- 2.
The School Journal is an instructional reading resource published at three different levels three times a year and freely available to teachers in New Zealand schools (http://literacyonline.tki.org.nz/Literacy-Online/Planning-for-my-students-needs/Instructional-Series/School-Journal).
- 3.
References
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969.
Anderson, D. (2013). Leading change in primary science: Experiences of Primary Science Teacher Fellows who have raised the profile of science in their schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 28(2), 15–27.
Anderson, D. (2015). The nature and influence of teacher beliefs and knowledge on the science teaching practice of three generalist New Zealand primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 395–423.
Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Association for Science Teachers & Laurence Erlbaum.
Bull, A. (2015). Capabilities for Living and Lifelong Learning: What’s Science Got to Do with It? Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/Capabilities%20for%20living%20and%20lifelong%20learning%28v2%29.pdf.
Bull, A., Gilbert, J., Barwick, R., Hipkins, R., & Baker, R. (2010). Inspired by science (A paper commissioned by the Royal Society of New Zealand and the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor). Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/pdfs/inspired-by-science.pdf.
Chamberlain, M., & Caygill, R. (2012). Key findings from New Zealand’s participation in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) in 2010/11. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/114995/Key-Findings-NZ-Participation-in-TIMSS-and-PIRLS-2010–2011.pdf.
Education Review Office. (2004). The quality of teaching in years 4 and 8: Science. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports/Science-in-Years-5-to-8-Capable-and-Competent-Teaching-May-2010/Introduction/The-quality-of-teaching-in-Years-4-and-8-Science-2004.
Education Review Office. (2010). Science in Years 5 to 8: Capable and competent teaching. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports/Science-in-Years-5-to-8-Capable-and-Competent-Teaching-May-2010/Overview.
Education Review Office. (2012). Science in the New Zealand Curriculum: Years 5 to 8. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports/Science-in-The-New-Zealand-Curriculum-Years-5-to8-May-2012/.
Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2013). Examining beliefs and practices of four effective Australian primary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43, 981–1003.
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2534–2553.
Millar, R. (2010). Analysing practical science activities to assess and improve their effectiveness. Hatfield: Association for Science Education. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/media/educationalstudies/documents/research/Analysing%20practical%20activities.pdf.
Millar, R. (2011). Reviewing the national curriculum for science: Opportunities and challenges. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 167–185.
Ministry of Education. (2001). Making better sense of the material world. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Paul, R. (2007). The king’s bubbles. Auckland: Scholastic.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Treagust, D. F. (2007). General instructional methods and strategies. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 373–391). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 3.1: Lesson Analysis Summary of Alison’s Bubble Unit with a New Entrant Class
Lesson 1 | Lesson 2 | Lesson 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Stated purpose | To answer individual children’s questions about bubbles (developed from wonderings in lesson 1) | As for yesterday—answer children’s questions | ||
Teacher emphasis | Observation, what is left when the bubble bursts, experience of bubbles | As above | As above | |
Classroom environment | Pleasant, bright cheerful with lots children’s thinking and work visible including bubble photos made into big book story on display. Children on mat—reluctant to come to mat, sleepy after lunch—very new entrants. Outside for bubbles | As for lesson 1. Today children very tired after jump jam all morning | Less tired than yesterday | |
Lesson overview | Advance organiser | Programme for the day on the board, Teacher goes through where we are in the day | Programme run through as in lesson 1 | Programme run through—Note: science is called Bubbles |
Shared learning intention | Let’s see if we can find out about these questions | Shares question to be investigated and activity | ||
Made link to previous lesson | Started by re-reading the bubble story and postcard from the postcards resource. Read out their bubble ideas from previous lessons | Strong links to previous lesson; children’s questions/wonderings | Links to yesterday | |
Checked home-work | Listens to links child has made at home—Bobbie answered his question! | |||
Contextualisation Evidence of connecting with students; students world; culture | Story and postcard. Previously children have read bubble stories and completed ‘what we know about bubbles chart’ Some exploration using bubble gun, completed class photo story | Student questions guide the lesson | Used Bobbie’s balloon he brought for news—like bubble because you can fill it with air. Teacher knew about the balloon and used it in the lesson | |
Evidence of relationship | Teacher knowledgeable about each child’s needs and strengths | Each student’s question written on a card. Listens to what they have done at home—children share ideas with teacher |
Investigation
Lesson 1 | Lesson 2 | Lesson 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Type | Free exploration | Exploration | Exploration |
How was it introduced? | Story used to determine focus ‘I wonder if we will see anything left on the ground?’ then, student-driven: bubble mixture put out one per child and they follow their own curiosity blowing bubbles. Going to ‘be scientists’ | Student questions on cards | Reading from a scientific text about bubbles and how they burst |
Skills Taught/practiced/applied [be specific] | Observing carefully: taught through imagining inside before going outside, then opportunities for practice outside | Focused observation-practiced. Practiced blowing bubbles without mixture first | Focused observation; colours in bubbles—outside and on torch in the dark: what colours can you see? |
Capability Taught/practiced/applied [be specific] | Observation-practiced Teacher asked them to focus on: what’s left after the bubble bursts—is there anything on the ground like in the book? What do you think has happened to the bubbles?’ What do you think is I the puddles? What do you think would be left over from the bubble mixture? Supported with: ‘Good explanation!’; ‘Good talking’; ‘What a good scientist you are!’ Magnifiers offered but not much interest—too busy with bubbles! Also deliberate scaffolding/ pushing for development of questions from wonderings Lots of vocabulary development from science | Gathering/using evidence to answer their questions-with strong support and guidance!! Student question: can you catch a bubble on your finger Teacher: who caught a bubble on their finger? Student Question: Can bubbles be different shapes? Teacher had provided different shapes to blow bubbles with—they identified different sizes but did not get different shapes | As above: observation but with links to vocab; ‘I am looking for lots of colour words!’ Reinforced with lots of praise ‘I’m so proud of you and your looking today!’ |
Teacher-led/demonstration | No—apart from choice of bubbles topic and leading imagining of observation of bubbles popping | Teacher led to answer children’s questions | Teacher led from children’s questions but also her own focus on bursting |
Instructions Verbal/written/text | Verbal | Verbal | Verbal |
Student involvement Decision about what to do: | All students were allowed to play with the bubble mixture: organisation allowed them each to have their own mixture and they each explored independently. Teacher suggested some things to look carefully at—focus was on what happens when the bubble bursts. ‘Look carefully at the ground where it bursts.’ | Student questions—answered with strong guidance from teacher but students involved as much as possible—e.g., Aggie gives out equipment as it is her question to be investigated Some students (advanced readers) have made a different mixture from school journal which is also investigated | Student questions but also teacher idea for activity |
Investigate | Yes | ||
Choose equipment | No | No | No |
What to measure | NA | Invited to suggest how they could find out e.g. why do they pop? Teacher: How could we find out? Child: We could look at bubbles… Child 2: Could look in a book… They do the next day! Books as referents? | No |
How to record results | No | No—simple observation | No |
How to analyse/summarise | No | No | |
Time given to think | Time to play and explore | Time to play and explore | Time to play and explore |
Critique their own design | |||
Critique others design | |||
How was the investigation concluded Reflection: | Reflection—considerable time spent by teacher recording individual ‘I wonder’ statements. Children got a bit bored and restless on the mat while other did theirs | Reflection—using evidence from observations to answer each child’s questions | Reflection—children draw bubbles and the colours they saw |
Quality of engagement | Enthusiastic: all!! Perseverance: most Attentive: most | High during practical outside, but lost interest in any talk time after about 5 min—rolling round on carpet During investigation: Enthusiastic: most Perseverance: most Attentive: most | Enthusiastic: most Perseverance: most Attentive: most |
On-task behaviour | Most | Most during investigation some during talk time afterwards | Most |
Researcher’s view | Focus: observation and fostering curiosity Students learnt ‘What happened when I…’ for bubbles. They followed their own lines of interest and observation, some with long intense periods of concentration: trying to join two bubbles together or trying to catch a bubble on a leaf or stick Children making useful observations in response to teacher Question: ‘When they pop they never come back’ ‘When some of the bubbles popped something was left’ | Focus was on gathering evidence to answer their own questions Children were interested in their question but not others… child on tape was interested in HER question and what she did to find out Children care and know whether or not their question has been answered- one child interviewed had not had her question answered—thought they would next time… | Children were able to give specific detailed observations about the colours they had seen ‘I can see a rainbow!’ ‘I can see purple!!’ |
Appendix 3.2 Student Post-unit Questionnaire—Patsy’s Fizzing and Foaming (Acid/Carbonate Reactions Unit with Year 5–6 (8–10 Years Old) Students
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moeed, A., Anderson, D. (2018). Science Investigation in Primary School. In: Learning Through School Science Investigation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1616-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1616-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1615-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1616-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)