Skip to main content

Introduction: Introducing Urban Alternatives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enabling Urban Alternatives

Abstract

This chapter introduces the key themes of the book with a point of departure in the discussion of the rationale for seeking to enable alternative urban futures. A brief diagnosis of the current urban condition is conducted, resulting in a range of challenge/possibility pairs that set the tone for the kinds of urban issues dealt with in the book. The chapter also includes a discussion on the new urban agenda recently introduced by the United Nations. Finally, it sets conceptual markers for the following chapters by exploring key concepts such as ‘enabling’, ‘the urban’, and ‘alternatives’. Introductions to the three parts of the book as well as brief summaries of the chapters are also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angelo, H., & Wachsmuth, D. (2015). Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12105

  • Atkinson, R., & Blandy, S. (Eds.). (2006). Gated Communities. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, S. (2008). Occupancy Urbanism: Radicalizing Politics and Economy beyond Policy and Programs. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., Phillips, R., & Yeo, W. W. (Eds.). (2003). Postcolonial Urbanism. Southeast Asian Cities and Global Processes. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsdorf, A., Hildalgo, R., & Vidal-Koppmann, S. (2016). Social Segregation and Gated Communities in Santiago de Chile and Buenos Aires. A Comparison. Habitat International, 54, 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., Madden, D. J., & Wachsmuth, D. (2011). Assemblage Urbanism and the Challenges of Critical Urban Theory. City, 15(2), 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban? City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 19(2–3), 151–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (Eds.). (2002). Spaces of Neoliberalism. Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickell, K., Arrigoitia, M. F., & Vasudevan, A. (Eds.). (2017). Geographies of Forced Eviction: Dispossession, Violence, Resistance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G., & Watson, S. (Eds.). (2011). The New Blackwell Companion to the City. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugmann, J. (2009). Welcome to the Urban Revolution. How Cities are Changing the World. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, A., & Shaban, A. (Eds.). (2017). Mega-Urbanization in the Global South. Fast Cities and New Urban Utopias of the Postcolonial State. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2006). Planet of Slums. London: Verso.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farias, I. (2011). The Politics of Urban Assemblage. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 15(3–4), 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias, I., & Bender, T. (Eds.). (2009). Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (2009). The Uses of Neoliberalism. Antipode, 41(S1), 166–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2011). The Great Reset. How the Post-Crash Economy Will Change the Way We Live and Work. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. (2011). Triumph of the City. How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, B. (2012). Critical Commentary. The Urban Age: Paradox and Prospect. Urban Studies, 49(5), 931–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, B. (2014). The Urban Condition. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iveson, K. (2014). Policing the City. In M. Davidson & D. Martin (Eds.), Urban Politics. Critical Approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jazeel, T. (2017). Urban Theory with an Outside. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817707968

  • Kuymulu, M. B. (2013). The Vortex of Rights: ‘Right to the City’ at a Crossroads. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12008

  • Lawhon, M., Ernstson, H., & Silver, J. (2014). Provincializing Urban Political Ecology: Towards a Situated UPE through African Urbanism. Antipode, 46(2), 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space (Trans. D. Nicholson-Smith). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G., & Ward, K. (2002). Spaces of Utopia and Dystopia: Landscaping the Contemporary City. Geografiska Annaler, 84B, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, C. (2011). The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space. Environment and Planning D, 29, 649–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mould, O. (2015). A Limitless Urban Theory? A Response to Scott and Storper’s ‘The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12288

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research., 35(2), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A., & Ong, A. (Eds.). (2011). Worlding Cities. Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions. Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2014). The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12134

  • Seto, K. C., Sanchez-Rodriquez, R., & Fragkias, M. (2010). The New Geography of Contemporary Urbanization and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (2015). Accentuate the Regional. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427-12176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, F. (2014). From ‘Rabble Management’ to ‘Recovery Management’: Policing Homelessness in Marginal Urban Space. Urban Studies, 51(9), 1909–1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turok, I. (2009). The Distinctive City: Pitfalls in the Pursuit of Differential Advantage. Environment and Planning A, 41, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2017). Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 23 December 2016. Resolution 71/256.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat. (2016). Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. World Cities Report 2016. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-Habitat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, A. (2015a). The Autonomous City: Towards a Critical Geography of Occupation. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 316–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, A. (2015b). The Makeshift City: Towards a Global Geography of Squatting. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 338–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Kaae Fisker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fisker, J.K., Chiappini, L., Pugalis, L., Bruzzese, A. (2019). Introduction: Introducing Urban Alternatives. In: Fisker, J., Chiappini, L., Pugalis, L., Bruzzese, A. (eds) Enabling Urban Alternatives. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1531-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1531-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1530-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1531-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics