Skip to main content

Multi-objective Optimization to Improve Robustness in Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Multi-Objective Optimization

Abstract

Robustness is one of the most important properties to consider when designing networked infrastructure systems such as the road network, airline network, and the electric power grid. A critical concern with such systems is that functionality must be maintained during the occurrence of natural disasters or deliberate attacks on their components. Multiple network robustness measures, each capturing different features of interest, have been formulated to evaluate the capability of a system to withstand such failures or attacks. These previously proposed robustness measures are sometimes uncorrelated or negatively correlated; hence, optimizing a single measure may not improve the overall robustness of the network. In this chapter, we propose a new approach addressing the budget-constrained multi-objective optimization problem of determining the set of new edges (of given size) that maximally improve multiple robustness measures. Experimental results show that adding the edges suggested by our approach significantly improves the network robustness, compared to previously proposed algorithms. The networks improved by our approach also maintain high robustness during random or targeted node attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Similar results were obtained when the experiments were carried out for 100 generated scale-free networks by: (1) fixing the number of nodes and changing power law parameter in the aforementioned range, and (2) changing the number of nodes in the aforementioned range and fixing the power law parameter.

  2. 2.

    We have experimented with other crossover operators such as two-point crossover, and the results were similar compared to the one-point crossover. Hence, the results with one-point crossover are reported here.

References

  • M.J. Alenazi, J.P. Sterbenz, Comprehensive comparison and accuracy of graph metrics in predicting network resilience, in 2015 11th International Conference on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN) (IEEE, 2015), pp. 157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Bechikh, L.B. Said, K. Ghédira, Searching for knee regions of the pareto front using mobile reference points. Soft Comput. 15(9), 1807–1823 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Bentley, J.P. Wakefield, in Finding Acceptable Solutions in the Pareto-Optimal Range using Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms (Springer London, 1998), pp 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0427-8_25

  • A. Bigdeli, A. Tizghadam, A. Leon-Garcia, Comparison of network criticality, algebraic connectivity, and other graph metrics, in Proceedings of the 1st Annual Workshop on Simplifying Complex Network for Practitioners (ACM, 2009), p. 4

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Boldi, M. Rosa, Robustness of social and web graphs to node removal. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(4), 829–842 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Boldi, M. Rosa, S. Vigna, Robustness of Social Networks: Comparative Results Based on Distance Distributions (Springer, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Chakrabarti, Y. Wang, C. Wang, J. Leskovec, C. Faloutsos, Epidemic thresholds in real networks. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. (TISSEC) 10(4), 1 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Chan, L. Akoglu, in Optimizing network robustness by edge rewiring: A general framework. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (DAMI), 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Chan, L. Akoglu, H. Tong, Make it or break it: manipulating robustness in large networks, in Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM Data Mining Conference (SIAM, 2004), pp. 325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Chaudhari, R. Dharaskar, V. Thakare, Computing the most significant solution from pareto front obtained in multi-objective evolutionary. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 1(4), 63–68 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Cheikh, B. Jarboui, T. Loukil, P. Siarry, A method for selecting pareto optimal solutions in multiobjective optimization. J. Inf. Math. Sci. 2(1), 51–62 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Corne, J.D. Knowles, Techniques for highly multiobjective optimisation: some nondominated points are better than others, in Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation (ACM, 2007), pp 773–780

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Deb, S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, T. Meyarivan, A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: Nsga-ii, in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI, (Springer, 2000), pp. 849–858

    Google Scholar 

  • F. di Pierro, Many-objective evolutionary algorithms and applications to water resources engineering. Ph.D. thesis, University of Exeter, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Drechsler, R. Drechsler, B. Becker, Multi-objective optimisation based on relation favour, in International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization (Springer, 2001), pp. 154–166

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Ellens, Effective resistance and other graph measures for network robustness. Ph.D. thesis, Master thesis, Leiden University, 2011, https://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/scripties/EllensMaster.pdf

  • W. Ellens, R.E. Kooij, Graph Measures and Network Robustness, 2013. arXiv:13115064

  • M. Farina, P. Amato, On the optimal solution definition for many-criteria optimization problems, in Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 2002. Proceedings. NAFIPS. 2002 Annual Meeting of the North American, 2002, pp. 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2002.1018061

  • M. Fiedler, Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czechoslov. Math. J 23(2), 298–305 (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Garza-Fabre, G.T. Pulido, C.A.C. Coello, Ranking methods for many-objective optimization, in Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (Springer, 2009), pp. 633–645

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Ghosh, S. Boyd, A. Saberi, Minimizing effective resistance of a graph. SIAM Rev. 50(1), 37–66 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Hartigan, M.A. Wong, Algorithm as 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C (Applied Statistics) 28(1), 100–108 (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H.J. Herrmann, C.M. Schneider, AA.. Moreira, J.S. Andrade Jr., S. Havlin, Onion-like network topology enhances robustness against malicious attacks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2011(01), 01–027 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Jamakovic, P. van Mieghem, On the Robustness of Complex Networks by using the Algebraic Connectivity (Springer, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Jun, M. Barahona, T. Yue-Jin, D. Hong-Zhong, Natural connectivity of complex networks. Chin. Phys. Lett. 27(7), 078–902 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • L.T. Le, T. Eliassi-Rad, H. Tong, Met: a fast algorithm for minimizing propagation in large graphs with small eigen-gaps, in Proceedings of the 2015 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, SDM, SIAM, vol. 15, 2015, pp. 694–702

    Google Scholar 

  • F.D. Malliaros, V. Megalooikonomou, C. Faloutsos, Fast robustness estimation in large social graphs: communities and anomaly detection. SDM, SIAM 12, 942–953 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Marchiori, V. Latora, Harmony in the small-world. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 285(3), 539–546 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.S. Peng, J. Wu, Optimal network topology for structural robustness based on natural connectivity. Phys. Stati. Mech. Appl. 443, 212–220 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Rousseeuw, Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Schneider, A.A. Moreira, J.S. Andrade, S. Havlin, H.J. Herrmann, Mitigation of malicious attacks on networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108(10), 3838–3841 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Srinivas, K. Deb, Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol. Comput. 2(3), 221–248 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Stewart, J.G. Sun, Matrix Perturbation Theory (computer science and scientific computing), 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Sudeng, N. Wattanapongsakorn, Post pareto-optimal pruning algorithm for multiple objective optimization using specific extended angle dominance. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 38, 221–236 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Sydney, C. Scoglio, D. Gruenbacher, Optimizing algebraic connectivity by edge rewiring. Appl. Math. Comput. 219(10), 5465–5479 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T. Tanizawa, S. Havlin, H.E. Stanley, Robustness of onionlike correlated networks against targeted attacks. Phys. Rev. E 85(4), 046–109 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Tizghadam, A. Leon-Garcia, Autonomic traffic engineering for network robustness. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 28(1), 39–50 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Tong, B.A. Prakash, C. Tsourakakis, T. Eliassi-Rad, C. Faloutsos, D.H. Chau, On the vulnerability of large graphs, in 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1091–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Tong, B.A. Prakash, T. Eliassi-Rad, M. Faloutsos, C. Faloutsos, Gelling, and melting, large graphs by edge manipulation, in Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and knowledge Management (ACM, 2012), pp 245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Wang, P. van Mieghem, Algebraic connectivity optimization via link addition, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information and Computing Sytems, ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 2008, p. 22

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Watanabe, N. Masuda, Enhancing the spectral gap of networks by node removal. Phys. Rev. E 82(4), 046–102 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.J. Wismans, T. Brands, E.C. Van Berkum, M.C. Bliemer, Pruning and ranking the pareto optimal set, application for the dynamic multi-objective network design problem. J. Adv. Transp. 48(6), 588–607 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Z.X. Wu, P. Holme, Onion structure and network robustness. Phys. Rev. E 84(2), 026–106 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Yazdani, R.A. Otoo, P. Jeffrey, Resilience enhancing expansion strategies for water distribution systems: a network theory approach. Environ. Model. Softw. 26(12), 1574–1582 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Zeng, W. Liu, Enhancing network robustness against malicious attacks. Phys. Rev. E 85(6), 066–130 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Chulaka Gunasekara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gunasekara, R.C., Mohan, C.K., Mehrotra, K. (2018). Multi-objective Optimization to Improve Robustness in Networks. In: Mandal, J., Mukhopadhyay, S., Dutta, P. (eds) Multi-Objective Optimization. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1471-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1471-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1470-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1471-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics