Skip to main content

Lens Injury

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Ocular Trauma

Part of the book series: Ocular Trauma ((OCTRA))

  • 774 Accesses

Abstract

Any mechanical or physical force that caused the crystalline lens position, stability, clarity, and capsular integrity to change is called lens injury. The mechanical forces include contused cataract, subluxation and dislocation (anteriorly into the anterior chamber or posteriorly into the vitreous cavity), perforation and penetrating injury, and intralenticular foreign bodies (siderosis bulbi, chalcosis, etc.). The physical forces include radiation (ionizing radiation, infrared radiation, ultraviolet radiation, microwave radiation, etc.), chemical injury, and electrical injury.

Lens injury demographically affects patients of all ages, with 53% of patients falling between 7 and 30 years of age. Male patients are four times more often affected than female patients (Lamkin et al., Am J Ophthalmol 113:626–631, 1992).

Sometimes contused cataract and lens dislocation occurred simultaneously in one eye. Lens injuries often combined with anterior and posterior segment injuries, such as cornea contusion, hyphema, traumatic glaucoma, iridodialysis cleft, mydriasis, cyclodialysis cleft, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, choroidal detachment, etc.

The treatment for lens injury is either medical or surgical, based on patient’s symptoms, needs, and expectations. Few mild subluxation or intralenticular foreign body composed of nonferric or non-cupric material which does not affect the vision can be managed conservatively by careful observation. Most of lens injuries, like other forms of crystalline lens pathology, require surgical intervention. The mode of surgical varies individually. Surgical extraction is the most common method. Whether the intraocular lens can be implanted or not at the meantime mainly depends on the retinal conditions. Besides, other tissues injured together also need intervention. Combined surgery was a good choice to cure other complications. Most cases had a good vision after intervention, while few patients got poor prognosis due to fundus irreversible injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lamkin JC, et al. Simultaneous corneal laceration repair, cataract removal, and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113(6):626–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salehi-Had H, Turalba A. Management of traumatic crystalline lens subluxation and dislocation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2010;50(1):167–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blecher MH, Kirk MR. Surgical strategies for the management of zonular compromise. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(1):31–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacob S, et al. Efficacy of a capsular tension ring for phacoemulsification in eyes with zonular dialysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(2):315–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Georgopoulos GT, et al. Management of large traumatic zonular dialysis with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation using the capsular tension ring. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(6):653–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marcus DM, Topping TM, Frederick AR Jr. Vitreoretinal management of traumatic dislocation of the crystalline lens. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1995;35(1):139–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Girard LJ, et al. Subluxated (ectopic) lenses in adults. Long-term results of pars plana lensectomy-vitrectomy by ultrasonic fragmentation with and without a phacoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(4):462–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peyman GA, et al. Management of subluxated and dislocated lenses with the vitrophage. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979;63(11):771–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greven CM, et al. Visual results, prognostic indicators, and posterior segment findings following surgery for cataract/lens subluxation-dislocation secondary to ocular contusion injuries. Retina. 2002;22(5):575–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kazemi S, et al. Combined pars plana lensectomy-vitrectomy with open-loop flexible anterior chamber intraocular lens (AC IOL) implantation for subluxated lenses. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;98:247–51. discussion 251–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Omulecki W, Stolarska K, Synder A. Phacofragmentation with perfluorocarbon liquid and anterior chamber or scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation for the management of luxated crystalline lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(11):2147–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yao K, et al. Phacofragmentation without perfluorocarbon liquid for dislocated crystalline lenses or lens fragments after phacoemulsification. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2002;12(3):200–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bleckmann H, Hanuschik W, Vogt R. Implantation of posterior chamber lenses in eyes with phakodonesis and lens subluxation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(4):485–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li H, et al. Coreoplasty and Artisan intraocular lens implantation for mydriasis and aphakic correction in post-traumatic vitrectomized eyes. Eye Sci. 2012;27(3):119–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman DJ, et al. Management of intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1987;94(12):1647–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cazabon S, Dabbs TR. Intralenticular metallic foreign body. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(12):2233–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dhawahir-Scala FE, Kamal A. Intralenticular foreign body: a D-Day reminder. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33(6):659–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss MJ, et al. Ocular siderosis. Diagnosis and management. Retina. 1997;17(2):105–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sneed SR, Weingeist TA. Management of siderosis bulbi due to a retained iron-containing intraocular foreign body. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(3):375–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu TT, et al. Lens siderosis resulting from a tiny missed intralenticular foreign body. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009;72(1):42–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DeAngelis D, Howcroft M, Aslanides I. Siderosis bulbi with an undetectable intraocular foreign body. Can J Ophthalmol. 1999;34(6):341–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, H. (2019). Lens Injury. In: Yan, H. (eds) Atlas of Ocular Trauma. Ocular Trauma. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1450-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1450-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1449-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1450-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics