Skip to main content

Gender Studies: A Theoretical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Reflecting on India’s Development
  • 507 Accesses

Abstract

The paper attempts to trace the history of the debate on the relationship between men and women since the days of the overthrow of matriarchy and placing the institution of property at the centrality of this debate. Beginning with the classical debates of Morgan-Engels, the paper looks at the current debates on gendered and gendering practices, glass ceiling hypothesis and gender as a social structure. Indicating the inherent flaws of the existing concepts and methods, a blueprint of the possible theoretical outline has been attempted by moving from individual subjectivity to plural objectivity, by challenging the locus of research, dilemma and jeopardy of gender studies, thus giving way to a new approach of gender as a social fact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baxter, J., & Wright, E. O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis, a comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia, Gender and Society, 14(2), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beoku-Betts, J. & Grant, L. (2004, December) Four years of books review in gender and society, similarities and differences in US focused and international works. Gender and Society, 18(3), 409–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D. M., & Williams, C. L. (2000, December). Response to baxter and wright, symposium. Gender and Society, 14(6), 804–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2003, June). Developing a theory of gender as practice, notes on Yancey Martin’s Feminist lecture. Gender and Society, 17(3), 370–372, 370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, J. (2003, October). Hormonal hierarchy, hysterectomy and stratified stigma. Gender and Society, 17(5) 750–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1977). The origin of the family. Private Property and the State: Progress publishers, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equality Now, Words and Deeds. (2015, January). Ending sex discrimination in the law. www.equalitynow.org.

  • Ferree, M. M., & Purukayastha, B. (2000). Equality and cumulative disadvantage, response to Baxter and Wright. Gender and Society, 14(6), 809–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg, E. (1975). Human economy. US: Mc-GrawHill inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, T., & Marmon, N. (2004, June). Lived regulations, systemic attributions, menstrual separation and ritual immersion in the experiences of orthodox Jewish women. Gender and Society, 18(3), 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, S.-E., Thomas, W., & Lang, S. (1997). Two spirit people: Native American gender identity, sexuality, and spirituality. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leacock E. B. (1981). Myths of male dominance. U.S: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrs, J. (2013). Our occulted history. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A. (2018). Poverty, women, and dignity: Reflecting on the writings of Ashapurna Devi. In Asia-Pacific Social Science Review 17(3), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient society, or researches in the lines of human progress from savagery through barbarism to civilization. Macmillan & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, J. (2017). Faith, belief, piety and feminism, beyond an awkward relationship. EPW, 52(42–43).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poasa, Kris. (1992). The samoan Fa’afafine: One case study and discussion of transsexualism. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 5(3), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purukayastha, B., et.al. (2003, August). The study of gender in India: A partial review. Gender and Society, 17(4), 503–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakhrani, M., et.al. (2017, November). Protection of women from domestic violence act (2006) in Haryana. EPW, 3(46).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O., Baxter, J. (2000, December). The glass ceiling hypothesis, a reply to critic. Gender and Society, 14(6), 814–821.

    Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indu Shekhar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shekhar, I., Dhar, R. (2018). Gender Studies: A Theoretical Perspective. In: NILERD (eds) Reflecting on India’s Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1414-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1414-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1413-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1414-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics