Skip to main content

Determination of Connectivity Using Minimum Connected Dominating Set Based on the Measure of Eigen Centrality in a Heterogeneous IoT Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Transformation – Digital Way (CSI 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 836))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 838 Accesses

Abstract

Ubiquitous connectivity, irrespective of technology, is one of the main challenges that have to be conquered to make the things speak among themselves and to make a successful IoT (Internet of Things) framework. The problem of IoT, at present, lies in the intercommunication among devices having different kinds of connection interface. As a result, percolation of message is blocked even between two neighbors of same kind within close proximity because of the presence of large number of other devices having mismatched communication interface in the neighborhood. Hence, a seemingly connected network may become disconnected.

In this paper, effort has been made to overcome the communication bottleneck that may arise due to co-located sensing and/or actuating nodes with different network interfaces. To investigate the problem mathematically, the network is taken as a graph consisting of randomly deployed nodes of different interface types. Minimum Connected Dominating Set (MCDS) algorithm is used to find out the optimal positions of nodes where Special-Purpose-Multiple-Interface nodes (SPMIN) capable to communicate with different types of connection interfaces are to be placed. Extensive simulation of this arrangement has been done and is found to improve the path finding probability, packet-delivery-ratio and reliability in the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ng, J.K.: Ubiquitous healthcare: healthcare systems and application enabled by mobile and wireless technologies. J. Converg. 3(2), 15–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bandyopadhyay, D., Sen, J.: Internet of things: applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 58(1), 49–69 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Regina, T.R., Tome, T., Rothenberg, C.E.: Scenario of evolution for a future internet architecture. In: Tronco, T. (ed.) New Network Architectures, pp. 57–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13247-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., Woelffle, S.: Vision and challenges for realizing the internet of things. In: Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things. European Commission (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Augusto, J.C., Callaghan, V., Cook, D., Kameas, A., Satoh, I.: Intelligent environments: a manifesto. Hum.-Centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 3, Article 12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miorandi, D., et al.: Internet of things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 10(7), 1497–1516 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shih, C.-S., Wu, G.-F.: Meta-routing over heterogeneous networks in M2M systems. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Poorter, E., Moerman, I., Demeester, P.: Enabling direct connectivity between heterogeneous objects in the internet of things through a network-service-oriented architecture. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2011, 61 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2011-6

  10. Gama, K., Touseau, L., Donsez, D.: Combining heterogeneous service technologies for building an Internet of Things middleware. Comput. Commun. 35(4), 405–417 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Altamimi, A.B., Ramadan, R.A.: Towards internet of things modeling: a gateway approach. Complex Adapt. Syst. Model. 4(1), 25 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, J., et al.: Connectivity, coverage and placement in wireless sensor networks. Sensors 9(10), 7664–7693 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung, E., Cho, I., Kang, S.M.: iotSilo: the agent service platform supporting dynamic behavior assembly for resolving the heterogeneity of IoT. Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw. 10(1), 608972 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, F., Vijeth, J.K., Siva Ram Murthy, C.: Parallel opportunistic routing in IoT networks. In: 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Capone, A., Cesana, M., De Donno, D., Filippini, I.: Optimal placement of multiple interconnected gateways in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: Fratta, L., Schulzrinne, H., Takahashi, Y., Spaniol, O. (eds.) NETWORKING 2009. LNCS, vol. 5550, pp. 442–455. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01399-7_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rehena, Z., et al.: Multiple sink placement in partitioned wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Next-Gen. Comput. 6(2), 79–95 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Penumalli, C., Palanichamy, Y.: An optimal CDS construction algorithm with activity scheduling in ad hoc networks. Sci. World J. 2015, Article ID 842346, 12 p. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/842346

  18. Sheu, J.-P., Lin, H.-F.: Probabilistic coverage preserving protocol with energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In: 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Penrose, M.D.: Random Geometric Graphs. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Alvarez-Socorro, A., Herrera-Almarza, G., Gonzalez-Diaz, L.: Eigencentrality based on dissimilarity measures reveals central nodes in complex networks. Sci. Rep. 5. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17095

  21. Scholartica Channel: Connected Dominating Sets and its Applications: Part 2 - Greedy Algorithm, online video clip, YouTube, 17 September 2015, Web 2 September 2017

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank to the Department of Science & Technology, Government of West Bengal (Memo No.-20(Sanc.)/ST/P/S&T/Misc-9/2014 dated 16/05/2017) for funding this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Partha Sarathi Banerjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Banerjee, P.S., Mandal, S.N., Maiti, B. (2018). Determination of Connectivity Using Minimum Connected Dominating Set Based on the Measure of Eigen Centrality in a Heterogeneous IoT Network. In: Mandal, J., Sinha, D. (eds) Social Transformation – Digital Way. CSI 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 836. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1343-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1343-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1342-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1343-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics