Abstract
Extant studies have shown that educational resources are a key factor affecting people’s fertility intention. However, there is no further subdivision as to which resources at which stages of education have a significant impact on fertility decision-making. Based on the 2014 Migrants Population Dynamic Monitoring Survey Data of China, this chapter analyzes the impact of regional kindergarten capacity and primary school resources on second birth intention of the floating population in the context of banishing the Chinese one-child policy and urbanization. It is demonstrated in the research that kindergarten capacity has a significant positive impact on fertility desire of all women of reproductive age, while primary school resources exert a significant influence on fertility desire of the floating population in provincial capitals. The research also finds that the floating population does have gender preference, which is consistent with the results of previous studies. The author finally discusses the theoretical and policy implications of these findings.
The author thanks Dr Binjian Yan for the contribution to the earlier version.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The floating population in China refers to those who leave their registered permanent residence to live elsewhere. It differs from typical internal migration or migrant workers.
- 3.
- 4.
The ‘per capita’ here puts permanent residents as the denominator, rather than the registered population.
References
Adsera A, Ferrer A (2013) The fertility of recent immigrants to Canada. IZA Discussion Paper 7289. Institute for the Study of Labor
Ajzen I, Klobas J (2013) Fertility intentions: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demogr Res 29:203
Baochang G, Feng W, Zhigang G, Erli Z (2007) China's local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Popul Dev Rev 33(1):129–148
Basu AM (2002) Why does education lead to lower fertility? A critical review of some of the possibilities. World Dev 30(10):1779–1790
Becker GS (2009) A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Becker GS, Lewis HG (1974) Interaction between quantity and quality of children. In: Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 81–90
Behrman JA (2015) Does schooling affect women’s desired fertility? Evidence from Malawi, Uganda, and Ethiopia. Demography 52(3):787–809
Berrington A (2004) Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Popul Trends 117:9–19
Berrington A, Pattaro S (2014) Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions and behaviour: a life course perspective. Adv Life Course Res 21(3):10–27
Bianchi SM (2014) A demographic perspective on family change. J Fam Theory Rev 6(1):35–44
Bongaarts J (1978) A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Popul Dev Rev 4(1):105–132
Bongaarts J, Potter RE (2013) Fertility, biology, and behavior: an analysis of the proximate determinants. Academic, Waltham
Bongaarts J, Watkins SC (1996) Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Popul Dev Rev 22(4):639–682
Bumpass LL (1987) The risk of an unwanted birth: the changing context of contraceptive sterilization in the US. Popul Stud 41(3):347–363
Cai Y (2010) China’s below-replacement fertility: government policy or socioeconomic development? Popul Dev Rev 36(3):419–440
Caldwell JC, London B, Hadden K (1989) The wealth flows theory of fertility decline. Rural Sociol 54(1):169–188
Chang S (1996) The floating population: an informal process of urbanisation in China. Int J Popul Geogr 2(3):197–214
Chen W, Wu L (2006) Research on the relationships between migration and fertility in China. Popul Res 30(1):13–20
Colleran H, Jasienska G, Nenko I, Galbarczyk A, Mace R (2014) Community-level education accelerates the cultural evolution of fertility decline. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 281(1779):20132732
De la Croix D, Doepke M (2004) Public versus private education when differential fertility matters. J Dev Econ 73(2):607–629
Easterlin RA, Crimmins EM (1985) The fertility revolution: a supply-demand analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Fan S, Zhang L, Zhang X (2002) Growth, inequality, and poverty in rural China: the role of public investments, vol 125. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
Hakim C (1998) Developing a sociology for the twenty-first century: preference theory. Br J Sociol 49(1):137–143
Hakim C (2003) A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory. Popul Dev Rev 29(3):349–374
Islam MM, Bairagi R (2003) Fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour in Matlab: do fertility intentions matter? J Biosoc Sci 35(04):615–619
Jasso G, Rosenzweig MR (1990) The new chosen people: immigrants in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Jensen E, Ahlburg D (2004) Why does migration decrease fertility? Evidence from the Philippines. Popul Stud 58(2):219–231
Jiang S, Lu M, Sato H (2012) Identity, inequality, and happiness: evidence from urban China. World Dev 40(6):1190–1200
Jing F (2004) Health sector reform and reproductive health services in poor rural China. Health Policy Plan 19(suppl 1):i40–i49
Kaplan H (1994) Evolutionary and wealth flows theories of fertility: empirical tests and new models. Popul Dev Rev 20(4):753–791
Kulu H, Milewski N (2008) Family change and migration in the life course: an introduction. Demogr Res 17:567–590
Lee BS, Pol LG (1993) The influence of rural-urban migration on migrants’ fertility in Korea, Mexico and Cameroon. Popul Res Pol Rev 12(1):3–26
Leibenstein H (1974) An interpretation of the economic theory of fertility: promising path or blind alley? J Econ Lit 12(2):457–479
Liang Z, Ma Z (2004) China’s floating population: new evidence from the 2000 census. Popul Dev Rev 30(3):467–488
Liu Y, Dijst M, Geertman S (2014) Residential segregation and well-being inequality between local and migrant elderly in Shanghai. Habitat Int 42:175–185
Lloyd CB, Gage-Brandon AJ (1994) High fertility and children’s schooling in Ghana: sex differences in parental contributions and educational outcomes. Popul Stud 48(2):293–306
Loo KK, Luo X, Su H, Presson A, Li Y (2009) Dreams of tigers and flowers: child gender predictions and preference in an urban mainland Chinese sample during pregnancy. Women Health 49(1):50
Milewski N (2009) Fertility of immigrants: a two-generational approach in Germany. Springer, Berlin
Miller WB, Pasta DJ (1995) Behavioral intentions: which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? J Appl Soc Psychol 25(6):530–555
Mills M, Mencarini L, Tanturri ML, Begall K (2008) Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demogr Res 18:1
Schoen R, Astone NM, Kim YJ, Nathanson CA, Fields JM (1999) Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? J Marriage Fam 61(3):790–799
Shue V, Wong C (2007) Paying for progress in China: public finance, human welfare and changing patterns of inequality. Routledge, Oxford
Sobotka T, Skirbekk V, Philipov D (2011) Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Popul Dev Rev 37(2):267–306
Solinger DJ (1999) China’s floating population: implications for state and society. In: Goldman M, MacFarquhar R (eds) The paradox of China’s post-Mao reforms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 220–240
Testa MR (2014) On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: individual- and country-level evidence. Adv Life Course Res 21(3):28–42
Toulemon L, Testa MR (2005) Fertility intentions and actual fertility: a complex relationship. Popul Soc 415:1
Tsai LL (2007) Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. Am Polit Sci Rev 101(02):355–372
Wang Y, Jiang D (2016) Educational inequality in migrant children in China: from visible exclusion to invisible discrimination. In: Hunner-Kreisel C, Bohne S (eds) Childhood, youth and migration. Children’s well-being: indicators and research, vol 12. Springer, Cham, pp 115–132
Westoff CF, Potter RG (2015) Third child: a study in the prediction of fertility. Princeton University Press, Pronceton
Yamaguchi K, Ferguson LR (1995) The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors: rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. Am Sociol Rev 60(April):272–298
Zhang J (1990) Socioeconomic determinants of fertility in China. J Popul Econ 3(2):105–123
Zhang L (2001) Strangers in the city: reconfigurations of space, power, and social networks within China’s floating population. Stanford University Press, Redwood City
Zhang X, Kanbur R (2005) Spatial inequality in education and health care in China. China Econ Rev 16(2):189–204
Zhou C (2015) Quantitative analysis on the relationship between socioeconomic development and fertility. Popul Res 39(2):40–47
Zhou C, Zhou XD, Wang XL, Zheng WJ, Li L, Hesketh T (2013) Changing gender preference in China today: implications for the sex ratio. Indian J Gend Stud 20(1):51–68
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zang, L. (2019). Kindergarten Matters: Second Birth Intention of Floating Population in Chinese Urbanization Process. In: Re-understanding of Contemporary Chinese Political Development . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1250-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1250-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1249-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1250-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)