Skip to main content

Kindergarten Matters: Second Birth Intention of Floating Population in Chinese Urbanization Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Re-understanding of Contemporary Chinese Political Development
  • 207 Accesses

Abstract

Extant studies have shown that educational resources are a key factor affecting people’s fertility intention. However, there is no further subdivision as to which resources at which stages of education have a significant impact on fertility decision-making. Based on the 2014 Migrants Population Dynamic Monitoring Survey Data of China, this chapter analyzes the impact of regional kindergarten capacity and primary school resources on second birth intention of the floating population in the context of banishing the Chinese one-child policy and urbanization. It is demonstrated in the research that kindergarten capacity has a significant positive impact on fertility desire of all women of reproductive age, while primary school resources exert a significant influence on fertility desire of the floating population in provincial capitals. The research also finds that the floating population does have gender preference, which is consistent with the results of previous studies. The author finally discusses the theoretical and policy implications of these findings.

The author thanks Dr Binjian Yan for the contribution to the earlier version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?

  2. 2.

    The floating population in China refers to those who leave their registered permanent residence to live elsewhere. It differs from typical internal migration or migrant workers.

  3. 3.

    http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/28/news/china-private-education-ryb/index.html, or https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/24/world/asia/beijing-kindergarten-abuse.html

  4. 4.

    The ‘per capita’ here puts permanent residents as the denominator, rather than the registered population.

References

  • Adsera A, Ferrer A (2013) The fertility of recent immigrants to Canada. IZA Discussion Paper 7289. Institute for the Study of Labor

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I, Klobas J (2013) Fertility intentions: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demogr Res 29:203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baochang G, Feng W, Zhigang G, Erli Z (2007) China's local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Popul Dev Rev 33(1):129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu AM (2002) Why does education lead to lower fertility? A critical review of some of the possibilities. World Dev 30(10):1779–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (2009) A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS, Lewis HG (1974) Interaction between quantity and quality of children. In: Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman JA (2015) Does schooling affect women’s desired fertility? Evidence from Malawi, Uganda, and Ethiopia. Demography 52(3):787–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrington A (2004) Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Popul Trends 117:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrington A, Pattaro S (2014) Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions and behaviour: a life course perspective. Adv Life Course Res 21(3):10–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi SM (2014) A demographic perspective on family change. J Fam Theory Rev 6(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts J (1978) A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Popul Dev Rev 4(1):105–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts J, Potter RE (2013) Fertility, biology, and behavior: an analysis of the proximate determinants. Academic, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts J, Watkins SC (1996) Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Popul Dev Rev 22(4):639–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass LL (1987) The risk of an unwanted birth: the changing context of contraceptive sterilization in the US. Popul Stud 41(3):347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y (2010) China’s below-replacement fertility: government policy or socioeconomic development? Popul Dev Rev 36(3):419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell JC, London B, Hadden K (1989) The wealth flows theory of fertility decline. Rural Sociol 54(1):169–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang S (1996) The floating population: an informal process of urbanisation in China. Int J Popul Geogr 2(3):197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Wu L (2006) Research on the relationships between migration and fertility in China. Popul Res 30(1):13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Colleran H, Jasienska G, Nenko I, Galbarczyk A, Mace R (2014) Community-level education accelerates the cultural evolution of fertility decline. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 281(1779):20132732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Croix D, Doepke M (2004) Public versus private education when differential fertility matters. J Dev Econ 73(2):607–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA, Crimmins EM (1985) The fertility revolution: a supply-demand analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Zhang L, Zhang X (2002) Growth, inequality, and poverty in rural China: the role of public investments, vol 125. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim C (1998) Developing a sociology for the twenty-first century: preference theory. Br J Sociol 49(1):137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim C (2003) A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory. Popul Dev Rev 29(3):349–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MM, Bairagi R (2003) Fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour in Matlab: do fertility intentions matter? J Biosoc Sci 35(04):615–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso G, Rosenzweig MR (1990) The new chosen people: immigrants in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen E, Ahlburg D (2004) Why does migration decrease fertility? Evidence from the Philippines. Popul Stud 58(2):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang S, Lu M, Sato H (2012) Identity, inequality, and happiness: evidence from urban China. World Dev 40(6):1190–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing F (2004) Health sector reform and reproductive health services in poor rural China. Health Policy Plan 19(suppl 1):i40–i49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan H (1994) Evolutionary and wealth flows theories of fertility: empirical tests and new models. Popul Dev Rev 20(4):753–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulu H, Milewski N (2008) Family change and migration in the life course: an introduction. Demogr Res 17:567–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee BS, Pol LG (1993) The influence of rural-urban migration on migrants’ fertility in Korea, Mexico and Cameroon. Popul Res Pol Rev 12(1):3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H (1974) An interpretation of the economic theory of fertility: promising path or blind alley? J Econ Lit 12(2):457–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Z, Ma Z (2004) China’s floating population: new evidence from the 2000 census. Popul Dev Rev 30(3):467–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Dijst M, Geertman S (2014) Residential segregation and well-being inequality between local and migrant elderly in Shanghai. Habitat Int 42:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd CB, Gage-Brandon AJ (1994) High fertility and children’s schooling in Ghana: sex differences in parental contributions and educational outcomes. Popul Stud 48(2):293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo KK, Luo X, Su H, Presson A, Li Y (2009) Dreams of tigers and flowers: child gender predictions and preference in an urban mainland Chinese sample during pregnancy. Women Health 49(1):50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milewski N (2009) Fertility of immigrants: a two-generational approach in Germany. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller WB, Pasta DJ (1995) Behavioral intentions: which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? J Appl Soc Psychol 25(6):530–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills M, Mencarini L, Tanturri ML, Begall K (2008) Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demogr Res 18:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen R, Astone NM, Kim YJ, Nathanson CA, Fields JM (1999) Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? J Marriage Fam 61(3):790–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shue V, Wong C (2007) Paying for progress in China: public finance, human welfare and changing patterns of inequality. Routledge, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka T, Skirbekk V, Philipov D (2011) Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Popul Dev Rev 37(2):267–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solinger DJ (1999) China’s floating population: implications for state and society. In: Goldman M, MacFarquhar R (eds) The paradox of China’s post-Mao reforms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 220–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa MR (2014) On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: individual- and country-level evidence. Adv Life Course Res 21(3):28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulemon L, Testa MR (2005) Fertility intentions and actual fertility: a complex relationship. Popul Soc 415:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai LL (2007) Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. Am Polit Sci Rev 101(02):355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Jiang D (2016) Educational inequality in migrant children in China: from visible exclusion to invisible discrimination. In: Hunner-Kreisel C, Bohne S (eds) Childhood, youth and migration. Children’s well-being: indicators and research, vol 12. Springer, Cham, pp 115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff CF, Potter RG (2015) Third child: a study in the prediction of fertility. Princeton University Press, Pronceton

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi K, Ferguson LR (1995) The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors: rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. Am Sociol Rev 60(April):272–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (1990) Socioeconomic determinants of fertility in China. J Popul Econ 3(2):105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2001) Strangers in the city: reconfigurations of space, power, and social networks within China’s floating population. Stanford University Press, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Kanbur R (2005) Spatial inequality in education and health care in China. China Econ Rev 16(2):189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C (2015) Quantitative analysis on the relationship between socioeconomic development and fertility. Popul Res 39(2):40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C, Zhou XD, Wang XL, Zheng WJ, Li L, Hesketh T (2013) Changing gender preference in China today: implications for the sex ratio. Indian J Gend Stud 20(1):51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zang, L. (2019). Kindergarten Matters: Second Birth Intention of Floating Population in Chinese Urbanization Process. In: Re-understanding of Contemporary Chinese Political Development . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1250-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics